The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 gave birth to a dangerous
American ideology called neoconservativism.
The Soviet Union had served as a constraint on US unilateral action. With the
removal of this constraint on Washington, neoconservatives declared their
agenda of US world hegemony. America was now the “sole superpower,” the
“unipower,” that could act without restraint anywhere in the world.
The Washington Post neoconservative
journalist Charles Krauthammer summed up the “new reality” as follows:
“We have overwhelming global power. We are
history’s designated custodians of the international system. When the Soviet Union fell,
something new was born, something utterly new–a unipolar world dominated by a
single superpower unchecked by any rival and with decisive reach in every
corner of the globe. This is a stagering new development in history, not seen
since the fall of Rome. Even Rome was no model for what America is
today.”
The
staggering unipolar power that history has given to Washington has to be
protected at all costs. In
1992 top Pentagon official Undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz penned the Wolfowitz
Doctrine, which became the basis for Washington’s foreign policy.
The Wolfowitz Doctrine states that the “first objective” of
American foreign and military policy is “to prevent the re-emergence of a new
rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere,
that poses a threat [to US
unilateral action] on the
order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant
consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we
endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources
would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.” (A “hostile power” is a country
sufficiently strong to have a foreign policy independent from Washington’s.)
The
unilateral assertion of American power begin in ernest during the Clinton
regime with the interventions in Yugoslavia, Serbia, Kosovo, and the no-fly
zone imposed on Iraq. In
1997 the neoconservatives penned their “Project for a New American Century.” In
1998, three years prior to 9/11, the neoconservatives sent a letter to
President Clinton calling for regime change in Iraq and “the removal of Saddam
Hussein from power.” Neoconservatives set out their program for removing
seven governments in five years.
The events of September 11,
2001, are regarded by informed people as “the new Pearl harbor” that the
neoconservatives said was necessary in order to begin their wars of conquest in
the Middle East. Paul O’Neil, President George W. Bush’s first Treasury Secretary,
has stated publicly that the agenda of President Bush’s first meeting with his
cabinet was the invasion of Iraq. This invasion was planned prior to 9/11. Since 9/11 Washington has
destroyed in whole or part eight countries and now confronts Russia both in
Syria and Ukraine.
Russia cannot allow a
jihadist Caliphate to be established in an area comprising Syria/Iraq, because
it would be a base for exporting destabilization into Muslim parts of the
Russian Federation. Henry Kissinger himself has stated this fact, and it is clear
enough to any person with a brain. However, the power-crazed
fanatical neoconservatives, who have controlled the Clinton, Bush, and Obama
regimes, are so absorbed in their own hubris and arrogance that they are
prepared to push Russia to the point of having their Turkish puppet shoot down
a Russian airplane and to
overthrow the democratically-elected government in Ukraine that was on good
terms with Russia, substituting in its place an American puppet government.
With this background, we can understand that the dangerous situation facing the world is the
product of the neoconservative’s arrogant policy of US world hegemony.
The failures of judgment and the dangers in the Syrian and Ukrainian conflicts
are themselves the consequences of the neoconservative ideology.
To perpetuate American
hegemony, the neoconservatives threw away the guarantees that Washington gave
Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch to the East. The neoconservatives
pulled the US out of the ABM Treaty, which specified that neither the US nor
Russia would develop and deploy anti-ballistic missiles. The neoconservatives
re-wrote US war doctrine and elevated nuclear weapons from their role as a
retaliatory force to a pre-emptive first strike force. The neoconservatives
began putting ABM bases on Russia’s borders, claiming that the bases were for
the purpose of protecting Europe from non-existent Iranian nuclear ICBMs.
Russia and Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, have been demonized
by neoconservatives and their puppets in the US government and media. For
example, Hillary Clinton,
a candidate for the Democratic nomination for president, declared Putin to be
“the new Hitler.” A former CIA official called for Putin’s assassination.
Presidential candidates in both parties are competing in terms of who can be
the most aggressive toward Russia and the most insulting toward Russia’s
president.
The effect has been to destroy the trust between nuclear powers.
The Russian government has learned that Washington does not respect
Washington’s own laws, much less international law, and that Washington cannot
be trusted to keep any agreement. This lack of trust, together with the
aggression toward Russia spewing from Washington and the “presstitute lame
stream” media and echoing in the idiotic European capitals, has established the
ground for nuclear war. As NATO (essentially the US) has no prospect of
defeating Russia in conventional war, much less defeating an alliance of Russia
and China, war will be nuclear.
To avoid war, Putin is non-provocative and low-key in his
responses to Western provocations. Putin’s responsible behavior, however, is
misinterpreted by neoconervatives as a sign of weakness and fear. The
neoconservatives tell President Obama to keep the pressure on Russia, and
Russia will give in. However, Putin has made it clear that Russia will not give
in. Putin has sent this message on many occasions. For example, on September 28, 2015, at the
70th anniversary of the United Nations, Putin said that Russia can no longer
tolerate the state of affairs in the world. Two days later Putin took command
of the war against ISIS in Syria.
The European governments, especially Germany and the UK, are
complicit in the move toward nuclear war. These two American vassal states
enable Washington’s reckless aggression toward Russia by repeating Washington’s
propaganda and supporting Washington’s sanctions and interventions against
other countries. As long as Europe remains nothing but an extension of
Washington, the prospect of Armegeddon will continue to rise.
At this point in time, nuclear war can only be avoided in two
ways. One way is for Russia and China to surrender and accept Washington’s
hegemony. The other way is for an independent leader in Germany, the UK, or
France to rise to office and withdraw from NATO. That would begin a stampede to
leave NATO, which is Washington’s prime tool for causing conflict with Russia
and, thereby, is the most dangerous force on earth to every European country
and to the entire world. If
NATO continues to exist, NATO together with the neoconservative ideology of
American hegemony will make nuclear war inevitable.
First they came for millions of our unborn babies, and His people did not fight the abortionists fear of being called male chauvinist pigs, sexists, and oppressors.
Then they came to defile us sexually, and His people did not fight the sex addicts for fear of being called homophobes.
Then they came for our national borders, and His people did not fight the Mexicans and the Muslims for fear of being called xenophobes, Islamophobes, and statists.
Then they came for our conservative Congress, and His people did not fight the RINOs and the communists for fear of being called uncooperative extremists.
Then they came for our Presidency, and His people did not fight Obama and his insurgents for fear of being called racists.
Then they came for our debt-free sovereign money, and His people did not fight the owners and employees of the Federal Reserve banking crime syndicate for fear of being called naive and unsophisticated.
Then they came for our churches, and His people did not fight the pacifist apostate pastors and priests spewing eunuch hermeneutics for fear of being called intolerant bigots.
Then they came for our military, and His people did not fight sequestering political insurgents trying to disarm us for fear of being called war mongers and colonialists.
Then they came for our America, and His people did not fight because they were no longer Americans and there was no fight left in them.
Then He came back for His people, but He did not know them -- so He left them.
(See Matthew 7:21-23, then Nehemiah 4:14.)
No comments:
Post a Comment