American intelligence sources said
Thursday that the two perpetrators of the mass shooting in San Bernardino,
California, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, had been designated by intelligence services as
terror suspects. Farook was on a US list, while Malik had been listed
by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. The sources added that a thorough check of
the detonators of the explosives used by the couple revealed that they were
assembled exactly according to the instructions published in Al-Qaeda's
"Inspire" magazine.
Two weeks before he and his wife embarked on a
shooting rampage for ISIS at the San Bernadino center, Syed Rizwan Farook, who had worked there, was
heard threatening Nicholas Thalasinos, pictured above, a religious Jew who was a
co-worker: “You will never see Israel,” he told him. The Islamist terrorist
made good on his threat when he shot Thalasinos dead among 13 others last
Wednesday.
Above, a map of Muslim pedophile gang locations.
The terror network behind the Nov. 13
massacre in Paris is suspected of connections with Muslims of Moroccan heritage
living in Birmingham, Britain’s second largest city. These suspects had
connections to Abdelhamid Abaaoud, the ISIS operative believed to be the
ringleader of the Paris outrage, which left 132 people dead. At least one
traveled to the UK before the shootings. This discovery has prompted increased
concern about terrorist attacks in the UK and the elevation of the alert in
British cities and in places like Birmingham which have large Muslim
communities..
The Islamic State early Saturday claimed
responsibility for the San Bernardino social center shooting. The
statement, aired by a radio station identified with ISIS, said that
it was committed by the group’s “followers in California.”
US federal agencies are
being forced to admit that Wednesday, Dec. 2, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik perpetrated
the first Islamic State (ISIS) terror attack in America.
Straight after the attack, on Dec. 3, when the two shooters were still unidentified and on the run, your Watchman inferred from the comment by an anonymous federal officer that “one of the shooters is an American citizen whose identity is known”. In other words, US intelligence had been onto Farook.
Straight after the attack, on Dec. 3, when the two shooters were still unidentified and on the run, your Watchman inferred from the comment by an anonymous federal officer that “one of the shooters is an American citizen whose identity is known”. In other words, US intelligence had been onto Farook.
Another comment made at
the time - “Links to international terrorism are still on the table as the
assailants could have been encouraged by a foreign terror group,” also betrayed
official knowledge of the suspects’ background and motives.
However, it was only on Friday, Dec. 4, that a number of “revelations” came spilling out.
David Bowdich, Assistant Director of the FBI Los Angeles field office, confirmed for the first time that the bureau was investigating the San Bernardino attack as an “act of terrorism.”
However, it was only on Friday, Dec. 4, that a number of “revelations” came spilling out.
David Bowdich, Assistant Director of the FBI Los Angeles field office, confirmed for the first time that the bureau was investigating the San Bernardino attack as an “act of terrorism.”
Tashfeen Malik, using an
alias, was also found to have pledged loyalty to ISIS leader Abu Bakr
Al-Baghdadi on Facebook.
It was not disclosed
how she came to be identified by the investigators. The use of a false name for
messages on the social media may fool the regular user, but not intelligence
and anti-terrorist agencies, which are able to uncover a real identity.
Phone calls from a blocked
number are traced with equal ease. The couple was reported to have tried to
destroy the phones and hard drives of their computers, indicating they knew that they were
“blown.”
The “revelation” by the FBI of Malik’s pledge to the ISIS leader by Facebook was in fact a bit of misdirection to conceal the fact that her husband and partner Farook had been on the radar of US anti-terror agencies before their murderous rampage at San Bernadino, and not just after the fact through his “soft connections.”
The “revelation” by the FBI of Malik’s pledge to the ISIS leader by Facebook was in fact a bit of misdirection to conceal the fact that her husband and partner Farook had been on the radar of US anti-terror agencies before their murderous rampage at San Bernadino, and not just after the fact through his “soft connections.”
Another comment by an FBI
official was also indicative.
He said: “investigators are exploring
Farook’s communications with at least one person who was being investigated for
possible terror connections… Some were by phone, some on social media.”
How and when were those
communications discovered? And
who is this person? The only answer given to those questions
from reporters was that this individual is in America. Was this the third
suspect mentioned on the day of the slaughter?
It stands to reason that the reference is to a secret
terrorist cell operating in America whose leader was most likely Farouk’s
controller. His communications would
have marked him for inclusion on the list of Americans with known terrorist
contacts – not just the wider circle of suspects, but the short list of
activists placed under 24/7 watch as a preventive measure.
The most suggestive
comment by the FBI official Friday night was this: “Farouk’s last communications with the contacts
was months ago.”
This comment may be interpreted in three ways:
This comment may be interpreted in three ways:
1. The intelligence watch
over his movements was discontinued during the months that the shooter was not
in communication with his “terrorist contact.”
2. Farouk and Malik used those months of freedom from surveillance to amass a war arsenal of guns, rifles, tens of thousands of rounds of ammo, at least 15 pipe bombs and materials for building additional devices including road bombs.
2. Farouk and Malik used those months of freedom from surveillance to amass a war arsenal of guns, rifles, tens of thousands of rounds of ammo, at least 15 pipe bombs and materials for building additional devices including road bombs.
3. This was not
discovered because it did not occur to the counter-terror agencies that Farouk and his presumed
controller had decided to break contact in the months leading up to the attack
in order in to lower Farouk’s profile and catch the surveillance off guard.
Friends, I wouldn’t be surprised if we
eventually learn that the “Feds” provided these animals with some of their guns
and ammo. Can you sat “false flag”?
The daily sitrep, 5 Dec 2015 for Syria and the southern front
The daily sitrep, 4 Dec 2015 for Syria and the southern front
The daily sitrep, 3 Dec 2015 for Syria and the southern front
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoQ9pW18Bm0
Escalation in Syria will lead to global war
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJKYxTuAB8E
The warning signs of nuclear war
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhHBEUHmZk8
No comments:
Post a Comment