Above, and in the pictures below, Craft Int'l mercenaries were present at the Boston Marathon bombing.
There are several inconsistencies in the official narrative surrounding
the shooting at a Department of Public Health holiday party in San Bernardino,
California. These clues hinted that there was a cover-up going on and that Syed
Farook and his wife were set up to take the blame. The eyewitness testimony and
their description of the attackers directly contradicts the official
narrative—they say that three tall, white males did all the shooting, not Syed
and certainly not his diminutive wife. Incredibly, the same establishment news
outlets who published the original interviews refused to follow up on this
major contradiction, discouraged the alternate testimonies and continued to
push the official version blaming the conveniently dead couple. One of the
witnesses said he even received a phone call directing him to change his story
and implicate Farook, but he refused. That’s real evidence of a cover-up and
conspiracy.
Here’s the emerging evidence by Counter Current News of the multiple
witnesses who saw the professional hit team that did the shooting (reminiscent
of the white hit team in the black Mercedes that did all the shooting at the
restaurants and bars during the Paris attack last month):
“It’s not
him,” a third San Bernardino shooting witness proclaimed about Sayd Farook and
his wife... Earlier this month, the attorneys for the Farook family maintained
that they do not believe the suspects are the ones who carried out the attacks
in question.
Several eyewitnesses and family of witnesses and
victims initially said that three athletic Caucasian men had been responsible
for carrying out the attacks. Police immediately banned them from speaking with
the media.
Just days
ago, another eye-witness in the office came forward and said that in spite of
what the law enforcement and mainstream media narrative is saying, the people
who carried out the attack where very athletic, large, Caucasian men, who were
three – not two – in number. Farook’s wife, it should be remembered weighed
approximately 90lbs.
Now, a third prominent eye-witness, [Chris]
Nwadike, has stepped up to challenge the mainstream narrative. He recently told
reporters he received a phone call from an unknown person around 7 p.m.,
on the evening of the shooting, who told him that he must say that Sayd Farook
was the shooter. You read that right, he says that he was called and told to
change his story and say that Farook carried out the attacks with his wife,
even though that is very different than what he witnessed.
Nwadike told
reporters: “No it’s not him [Sayd]. I told them about it. He’s quiet. He
doesn’t make any trouble.” “He was just spraying bullets everywhere,” Nwadike
said. But the gunman was not Sayd, or his wife.
Tim Brown relayed an
interesting conversation with
a former government contractor implicating the same tactical training company
that was suspiciously everywhere during the Boston Marathon bombing. The
following was published by the Washington Standard
Yesterday, I
reported on the fact that multiple outlets had reported three shooters in the
San Bernardino massacre, including claims that they were white males. While we
have been told that Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were the ones who were the
killers, former National
Security Agency/ Central Intelligence Agency contractor Steven D. Kelley says
that it was a false flag operation that was carried out by a tactical training
company for the US military, known as Craft International.
Kelley, who is a weapons expert, was interviewed
on Press TV on Tuesday and said that the shooting “is just one in a long string
of false flag events that I am afraid to say are not over.”
“We’ll probably be seeing several more before
the end of the year, because of the events that are going on in the world,
specifically with the NATO being implicated in the buying of oil from Daesh and
other events,” he added.
“So when
these things happen they need to have a rapid response which requires a false
flag attack. This was very obvious that this was going to happen,” Kelley
continued.
“The people that were on the scene and saw this
happen also reported that three tall white men wearing black shirts, khaki
pants and tanned combat boots were actually the shooters,” Kelley told Press
TV. “The description is almost exactly what the gentlemen from Craft
International, the mercenary organization that was involved in so many other
false flags, actually look like. This seems to be their standard uniform.”
While Obama
took advantage of the crisis to attack the rights of gun owners, Kelley said,
“The people that are being implicated – the couple — first of all if they were
planning something, if they were radicalized as this is being said, and clearly
the NSA, the FBI will be right on the top of these people all the time, but
rather than stopping them from doing something, they were nurtured to be used
for this exact purpose.”
Well, if that were the case, where is the FBI
when it comes to at least 22 verified Islamic terror training camps on
US soil? Why is the FBI not enforcing the laws against totalitarian Islamists
consistent with the law? [and why aren’t they active, doing any terror
attacks? -Because this is
controlled terror, not real. Someday they might be unleashed].
“I do not
suspect that these people have anything to do with the actual shooting,” he
said. “I suspect that these were patsies, [I agree—to
divert attention away from the 3 shooters who the government has never attempt
to find] no different than Timothy McVeigh or any of these other people
who have historically been used to implement these terrorist acts.”
I have no problem with Kelley’s assessment that
they were patsies, but that doesn’t explain how they were on the scene with the
weapons they had and in full body armor and shot down the way they were.
“If you look at the people that were wounded you
can see clearly that bullet wounds are not real. The 223 weapon or bullets
fired from AR15 – an extremely powerful weapon — would blow someone’s arm off,
it is not going to make a small hole,” said Kelley.
“So clearly this is a very, very dirty false
flag. Obviously, the United States is getting very, very desperate; the
government here is very desperate, they need to do something immediately to
disarm the United States prior to a revolution, because the
people here are waking up very fast, and they are ready to shut down this evil
empire. And this needs to happen very soon,” Kelley concluded.
Now, the question is this: Since Former CIA
Director William Casey said in 1981, “We’ll know our disinformation program is
complete when everything the American public believes is false,” should we
believe Mr. Kelley or the media? Or, are we simply doomed to not know exactly
what took place in San Bernardino? Personally, I’m not convinced of Mr.
Kelley’s assertions and I do believe that Muslims were behind the attack, though
I still would like to know who the third suspect was and why they were not
held. Infowars.com added that details from the first witness who came out
saying there were three shooters:
An eyewitness account by Sally Abdelmageed, a worker at the Inland Regional Center in San
Bernardino, reported “three men dressed in all black, military attire, with
vests on they were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors
to building three… one of them… started to shoot into the room.”
Abdelmageed said “I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on…[ski masks
that cover most of the face] black cargo pants, the kind with the big
puffy pockets on the side… long sleeve shirt… glove… huge assault rifle… six
magazines… I just saw three dressed exactly the same.” “It looked like their
skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared
to be tall,” she told CBS News.
“You are certain you saw three men,” the newscaster asked. “Yes,” said
Abdelmageed. “It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they
were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”
In a shill-like manner the CBS reporter responded, [trying to
undermine what she just said] “And of course we just learned that one suspect
was a woman.”
Another witness backed up Abdelmageed’s story. Juan Hernandez told
a local NBC affiliate he saw “three white men in military fatigues” leaving the
scene.
What makes this a media cover-up is the fact that none of the mainstream
media has ever posed any questions about these contradictions. They simply keep
pushing the government narrative focusing on Farook and his wife. We have seen
dozens of in-depth articles examining the couples radicalization and prior
attempts to pull off an attack. But this new information emerging is sounding
much like the multiple times in history when FBI agent provocateurs have
induced disturbed Muslims to commit acts of terror.
Even the daily coverage of Enrique Marquez who authorities say bought the assault
rifles for the suspects has signs of being a set-up:
1. Previously the ATF assured the public that the weapons had been bought
legally by a known person to the government. CBS News reporter Paula Reid
said that two of the guns were purchased by someone who is “already known by
investigators” and the weapons were “legally transferred from a friend.”
The last part is false. They were not legally transferred. There is no
paperwork transferring ownership of the weapons to Farook, as required by
California law:
There is no paperwork transferring ownership of the weapons to Farook,
federal officials have previously said.... When neither party to a
transaction is a licensed firearms dealer, firearms transfers in California
must be completed through a licensed California dealer. To complete such
transactions, the seller or transferor must provide the firearm to the dealer,
who will deliver the firearm to the purchaser or transferee following a
background check and expiration of the mandatory state waiting period.
2. It is telling that gun
purchaser Marquez is not being charged with violating the transfer law. Perhaps
that is because he did it on behalf of a police undercover agent. That is what
GOP Presidential candidate Carly Fiorina heard at MSNBC while awaiting her
appearance on the Morning Joe Show. She said,
“If you listen to your reporter
earlier, what he said is the ATF believes that someone purchased this gun on
behalf of the police department and somehow that gun ended up in the hands of
this guy, so it actually does not sound at all like this man purchased a
firearm.”
Joe Scarborough suddenly changed the subject, clearly not wanting to
address the blockbuster information she heard (and which he too must have
heard). This doesn’t necessarily mean that Marquez was directly working for
police, but perhaps a “handler” could have worked with him to get the weapons
on behalf of Farook and wife, who were being set up as patsies. By the way,
that would make Marquez a straw buyer (someone who buys a weapon on behalf of
another to evade the background check on the hidden party) which is also
illegal in California.
Because the police evaded
every witness that described the three shooters and have tried to hide another
“third suspect” who they detained but refused to talk about, I can’t help but believe they were under federal pressure to engage in a
cover-up, just like the entire media corps who is walking lock step to push the
official line, avoiding any discussion of the tall three men who were allowed
to get away. Just as the Paris police never went looking for the Black Mercedes
and its professional hit-men, so the San Bernardino police and FBI have never
even hinted that they are pursuing the three men mentioned by multiple
witnesses.
The evidence of government knowledge of this attack continues to come
out. For example, Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard reported that,
Law enforcement officials in San Bernardino and Los Angeles may have
investigated Syed Farook one week before the shooting on the community
development center... Federal and local authorities have insisted that neither
of the attackers had aroused suspicion before the assault earlier this month
and that both Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, were unknown to law
enforcement and US intelligence. But conversations between law enforcement
officials in the hours after the shootings leave a different impression.
Farook is first identified by
name at approximately 11:40am local time, just a half hour after the shooting
began. The information came from a county worker, who
noted that Farook had been acting nervous and left the holiday party twenty
minutes before the shooting began. [notice he didn’t say he’d actually seen
Farook doing the shooting].
In a subsequent exchange at
approximately 12:08pm the dispatcher addresses an officer nicknamed
"Trav" upon hearing "Syed Farook." She says:
"Reference that name, I believe one of the [garbled] was working that name
up for something last week. I'll have to check."
In a second exchange shortly
after 12:20, another officer says of Farook: "I just got some info from
that LAPD that they have information on one of your suspects. I heard that
somebody was trying to INV that guy. Can you find out who I can give this
information to?"
I think the emphasis on legal purchase (in California, no less,
with some of the strictest gun regulations in the nation) is meant to bolster
the case for banning all assault weapons rather than just regulating them. In
the aftermath of the San Bernardino shooting there was a massive wave of gun
buying, including assault weapons as people could see where the government is
heading with all this anti-gun hype. The Gateway Pundit noted that “over
100 million guns have been sold in the United States since Barack Obama was
elected president.”
No comments:
Post a Comment