PATRIOTS TIME TO RESIST!
IT IS LEXINGTON & CONCORD TIME!
by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
August 21, 2021
As anyone who's been paying attention will know, Imperial College
London played a key role in providing the justification for the scamdemic
hysteria and Oxford University played a key role in providing the
"solution" to that problem.
Specifically, as you'll
recall from Who Is Bill Gates?, it was the Imperial
College COVID-19 Research Team that issued a report on March 16th, 2020,
predicting the deaths of up to 500,000 Britons and 2.2 million Americans unless
strict government measures were put in place, and it was this (completely erroneous) report—along with a similarly alarmist model from the Gates-funded Institute for Health Metrics
and Evaluation—that was used to justify the first round of
lockdowns in the US and the UK. And, as you'll recall from my report with Whitney Webb on the Oxford-AstraZeneca Eugenics Links,
it was the Oxford Vaccine Group's partnership with AstraZeneca that gave rise
to one of the injections currently making its way into the veins of hundreds of
millions around the globe in the name of "fighting COVID."
So it should be no surprise
that Imperial College and Oxford University researchers also played a key role
in a pre-scamdemic report that was recently dug up by The Daily Expose and
that lays out the gameplan for the implementation of an even bigger globalist
agenda: the shutdown of the global economy.
The report, entitled "Absolute Zero: Delivering the UK’s climate change
commitment with
incremental changes to today’s technologies"
was produced in 2019 by UK FIRES, "a collaboration between the
universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and Imperial College
London" that is "aiming to reveal and stimulate industrial growth in
the UK compatible with a rapid transition to zero emissions." It slipped
largely under the radar
"Absolute Zero" is supposedly a reference to the UK's
commitment to reach "zero emissions"—or a state in which there is no
net emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere—by the year 2050. But
"absolute zero" also serves as a reference to the bone-chilling
vision for the future of humanity that the globalists and their academic
minions are busily constructing for humanity under cover of the scamdemic.
Strap in, folks. This is
going to be a wild ride.
OK, first things first. Read the report. Or, at least give it a good
once over. When you do, you'll see that the ostensible purpose of the report,
according to its Executive Summary, is to answer the question: "if we
really want to reach zero emissions [in the UK] in thirty years time, what does
that involve?"
Their answers should not be surprising to anyone who has been watching
the unfolding of the anti-human, anti-life agenda from the release of The Club of Rome's Limits to Growth report in
1972 to the birth of Agenda 21 at the Maurice Strong-led 1992 UN Earth Summit to the
roll out of The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in
recent years.
Namely, the authors of "Absolute Zero" inform us that:
·
All airports in the UK except Heathrow, Glasgow and
Belfast will close
in the next decade and all air traffic will cease by the year
2050.
·
All existing forms of blast-furnace production and all
existing forms of cement production will be
halted by the year 2050, meaning that "the construction industry has to
radically change its production process or close" and that buildings will become smaller and
much more expensive.
·
All naval shipping will cease by the year
2050 (with the possibility of some shipping resuming some time "beyond
2050" when freight ships have been equipped with onboard nuclear power).
·
All consumption of beef and lamb will cease by the year
2050 along with all consumption of overseas foods that are not imported by rail
(see air traffic and shipping above).
·
And, of course, all non-renewable energy
production will cease
by 2050.
Those are just the
highlights, but you can find many, many more bold (and oddly specific)
pronouncements about what we can expect in our carefully restricted future
scattered throughout the report's 57 pages. See, for example, page 25, where we
learn that coloured ceramics will be a thing of the past by 2050 unless our
wise technocratic overlords can find a production method for such material that
doesn't require fossil fuel-dependent reduction firing.
Naturally, the entire screed
is lovingly illustrated with the type of utterly impenetrable spaghetti graphs
that can only be produced by the type of deranged mind that would write a
report like this in the first place.
Any questions?
Observing all of this, some
question might occur: Why 2050? And how are these report writers so confident
that they know what will occur by this mysterious date?
The authors provide the
answer to this in the "Why this report matters" section of the
document where they write: "In her last significant act as Prime Minister,
Theresa May changed the UK’s Climate Change Act to commit us to eliminating all
greenhouse gas emissions in the UK by 2050." They later state that the
activities they say will cease by 2050 are those "which will be illegal in
2050 due to the Climate Change Act."
They are referring to
ex-Prime Minister Theresa May's 2019 amendment to the 2008 Climate Change Act,
which, according to the UK government's own press release, "puts the UK on the
path to become the first major economy to set net zero emissions target in
law."
The amendment
itself—formally the "Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order
2019"—consists of a single clause, changing the original act's
stipulation that "the net UK carbon account for the year 2050 is at least
80% lower than the 1990 baseline" to read "100% lower." In
effect, as the authors of the Absolute Zero report state, this represents a
legally binding pledge that the UK will be "net zero" for its
"carbon account" by the year 2050. From this kernel of truthiness, the
ravenous haters of humanity over at UK FIRES have constructed their
"Absolute Zero" edifice, declaring that anything that emits
greenhouse gases will be illegal in the year 2050.
Of course, this is nonsense.
As the Absolute Zero report itself quietly concedes in an innocuous paragraph
headlined "What we mean by Absolute Zero," the report's authors'
interpretation of the law will almost certainly differ from that of whatever
government is in charge in the year 2050 (assuming the act itself has not been
amended or scrapped by that point). "The UK’s Climate Change Act contains two 'escape' words,"
they admit, those escape words being "net" emissions and emissions
that occur in UK "territory." As they rightly surmise, these
words will doubtless be interpreted by any conceivable future government t o
mean that any amount of dastardly "emissions" are in fact allowable
under the act, provided that those emissions are "offset" by carbon
trading or some other such sleight-of-hand nonsense; and that any emissions
that do not occur directly on UK territory (like the emissions involved in
shipping goods to UK territory) will not count toward the "carbon
account."
For this reason, the
Absolute Zero team has decided to construct their entire report on an
interpretation of a law that would not be used by any rational government: that
by 2050 the UK will literally not be emitting any greenhouse gases at all. But
as we all know, the UK government—if it acts in the way that governments
generally act—will simply kick the can down the road when 2050 arrives by
amending the legislation or using accounting tricks to declare themselves to
have reached the "net zero" target, regardless of how much the
country might be emitting in reality.
But here's the worrying part: We are—as even the dumbest, blindest and
most willfully ignorant can see after the past 18 months of lockdown
insanity—not dealing with rational governments. In fact, if
the political status quo is not changed in the near future, then the real
criticism to be leveled at the Absolute Zero report is that it assumes the
globalists will wait until 2050 to shut down productive human activity. In
reality, the UK government has already moved to enshrine into law a 78% reduction in
emissions (from 1990 levels) by 2035 and there is no indication that they are
going to use accounting tricks to allow people an escape from this future of
artificially-imposed poverty. This is the land of the proposed carbon ration account we're talking
about, after all.
Now, to be fair, there is a
type of rationality at play on the part of those who are seeking to shut down
the world economy, stop all meaningful productive activity, and deliberately
set about returning humanity to the stone age . . . it is just not the type of
"rationality" that any normal person would assume. Many still believe
that national governments are run by corrupt but not malignant politicians, if
not for the benefit of the nation then for the benefit of the nation's business
and industrial interests. But this is not true. As recent events have shown,
national governments are increasingly working toward an international agenda
that is set by intergovernmental bodies (whether the WHO/Gates/Gavi/Big Pharma cartel
in the case of the scamdemic or the UN/Club of Rome/WEF cartel in the case of
Agenda 2030) that is not beholden to antiquated ideas of "national"
interest.
No, these intergovernmental
bodies are stewarded over not by national partisans who are concerned about the
well-being of their fellow countrymen, but—as I have extensively documented in report after report after report after report over the decades—eugenics-obsessed
elitists who care more about their fellow travelers (of whatever nationality)
than they do about the vast majority of people who happen to claim citizenship
in the same nation-state as themselves. In the twisted ideology of these
elitists, their families are worthy of enjoying the fruits of
Mother Earth while the common people (i.e., you, me, and everyone else reading
these words) pose the "problem" of "the growing human population."
In the days of yore, the
eugenicists used the fig-leaf of religion to justify their beliefs. They
deserved to rule because God appointed their family to be rulers. In more
recent times, they have tried to use the fig-leaf of science to justify their
beliefs. They deserved to rule because their stock was inherently superior to
the "defective and degenerate protoplasm" of
the lower classes. And, now that the charlatanry of eugenics has gone out of
style, they have attached themselves to the conversation movement, using Malthus in, Malthus out computer models and
Absolute Zero reports to argue that the vast majority of the population will
have to start seeing privation as prestigious if human
civilization is to be derailed and neo-feudalism reinstituted.
This is the logic of the
global elite, and by those standards the Absolute Zero report
is (unfortunately for all of us) exactly correct. The people who are really in charge of the UK—not the
politicians who are paraded in front of the public to take the blame for the
agenda, but the unchanging old guard of the international agenda—really do want
you to stop eating meat . . . and instead start eating the protein-based
meat-like substitutes that are grown in their labs.
They really do want
you to stop buying new homes and constructing new buildings . . . and instead
become perpetual renters on the real estate market that they are monopolizing.
They really do want
to end all commercial air traffic . . . and instead keep the skies clear for their private jets.
This is the agenda that is coming into view and that the
Absolute Zero writers accurately document. In the future, if these eugenicists get their way, you
will be a completely controlled serf on the neo-plantation, relying on
government permission for even the bare necessities of life while your
jet-setting globalist overlords laugh at you from their lakeside mansions.
And the worst part is that the people behind Absolute Zero know that
the most effective way to implement this agenda will not be by issuing top-down,
authoritarian legislative decrees. Instead, it will be implemented most
efficiently by making the public desire their new peasant
lifestyle.
In an interview with The Ecologist shortly
after the release of the report, Absolute Zero lead author Julian Allwood was asked about the
wisdom of placing too much of the burden of responsibility for the shift to
Absolute Zero on individuals rather than on the mega-corporations and the
governments that are responsible for the majority of emissions in the first
place. "Demanding that a harried parent or a stressed-out worker or an
internet-uncertain elderly citizen should address these questions is a recipe
for turning them against your programme?"
Allwood responded by
approvingly citing an instance of social shame that has been used to effect the
type of transformation that he wants to see take place in UK society:
There’s a very encouraging example in Sweden, with the two mothers who
set up the movement to have a hundred thousand people sign up and pledge not to
fly for a year. That led to the ‘flight shame’ [flygskam] movement in
Sweden. As a result, if you look at national statistics on take-offs in Sweden,
the domestic ones have fallen and the government has responded by investing
more in rail as an alternative to aviation.
Flight shame, indeed. You do
not need to be a Nostradamus to see where this is heading: Eating meat shame.
Heating your home in the winter shame. Using electricity shame. Not starving to
death in the gutter shame.
But, as worrying as this is,
Allwood's example does point to a potentially hopeful fact:
the same principle that is being deployed by the would-be social engineers to
achieve their goals is the same principle that free humanity could use to
achieve theirs. By raising awareness that alternatives to the Club of Rome /
WEF/ UN agenda are not just available but desirable, and that the growing human population is
in fact the answer to the problems created by the parasitic
elite that are trying to blame us for the mess that we have created, we
can turn this around. We
can, at the very least, make the Absolute Zero agenda unworkable through mass
noncompliance.
All we have to do is to
convince the masses that the true goal of these elite institutions and pampered
eugenicists is not to "save the earth," but to condition the mass of
humanity to accept austerity while the elitists continue to live their lives of
unimaginable comfort and wealth. Remarkably, though, although this seems like a
slam dunk case, many people—gas lit their whole lives to believe that their
"original sin" of living on this earth is an environmental crime and
that they must pay penance to the global elite for their "carbon
footprint"—are incapable of understanding the true nature of this Absolute
Zero scam.
This is why we need to redouble our efforts to show the public the true
nature of the problem we face: not an overpopulated earth, but an earth where a
wealthy elite are deliberately engineering catastophes—environmental, economic,
geopolitical and otherwise—so that they can then pose as our savious and
propose their "solution" of neofeudalism to consolidate their control
over the planet.
Maybe we can start by
affirming that the Absolute Zero fanatics will pry the colored ceramics from
our cold, dead hands!
This weekly editorial is
part of The Corbett
Report Subscriber newsletter.
To support The Corbett Report and to access the full newsletter, please sign up to become a member of the website.
No comments:
Post a Comment