Watch the video below and read the companion article below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7qjeaQTBAM
Since
day one, Roy Moore has unequivocally denied the allegations of decades-old
sexual misconduct that have tarnished his Senate race.
While Democrats and the "lamestream, presstitute media" are trying
desperately to smear the GOP candidate and
shame anyone who gives him the benefit of the doubt, some new evidence just
blew a hole in the accusations.
One of Moore’s accusers, Leigh Corfman, claims that
almost 40 years ago, Moore tried to initiate a sexual relationship with her
while she was still a teenager.
Her
accusations hinge on two points: First, that she was left alone with the
then-32-year-old attorney Roy Moore during a family court case… and second,
that she lived with her mother in Gadsden, Alabama, when Moore allegedly
harassed her.
Both of those points have now been called into
question. The "Washington Compost" story
that originally outlined the case against Moore appears have have left some
major details out — details that bring new questions about the story itself.
“Regarding
the original court hearing where Corfman says that Moore asked her for her
number while Wells went inside the courtroom, the Post reported
that it ‘confirmed that her mother attended a hearing at the courthouse in
February 1979 through divorce records.”
That part is a known fact. There was a court
hearing involving Leigh Corfman and her mother, Nancy Wells. However, the
Post left out a glaring detail: It was a custody case involving the 14-year-old
girl, which means that there’s a good chance Corfman was in the courtroom, not
left with Moore.
Additionally,
the entire point of that court hearing was to give custody of the teenager to
her father. She went to live with him soon after, not at her mother’s Gadsden
house as the allegations claim.
According to court records, Corfman’s father’s
house was in a completely different town called Ohatchee.
“This would mean that from the court hearing on
February 21, 1979, until Corfman was ordered to move to her father’s house,
Moore would only have had 12 days, including the day of the court hearing, to
have repeatedly called Corfman at her mother’s Gadsden house, arrange two
meetings, and attempt another. Moore has strenuously denied the accusations.”
Oddly, the fact that there was a window of just
over 10 days for all of the alleged incidents to have taken place was not
raised by the "Washington Compost’s" article. Even more strangely, the change of
custody and living location is completely missing from the accounts of Moore’s
accuser.
“Neither Corfman nor Wells publicly mentioned the
change in custody during the critical period where Moore was said to have
arranged meetings with Corfman outside her mother’s home.”
A skeptic might wonder why these
seemingly major details were left out. It gets even more odd.
Not only do court records indicate that Corfman
stopped living at her mother’s house during the time frame of the accusations,
but details provided by the accuser simply don’t hold up to scrutiny.
For instance, Leigh Corfman claims that Moore
secretly called her on her bedroom phone in her mother’s house to arrange a
meeting. Remember, this was 1979, long before cell phones and even cordless
home phones were commonplace.
“Wells,
71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the
period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman — purportedly on
Corfman’s bedroom phone.”
On that apparently non-existent phone, the accuser, Corfman, claims she agreed to meet Moore at a specific intersection “around the corner”
from her house… a house where she no longer lived.
Around
the corner —
remember that.
“The "Compost" reports,
‘She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans
for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from
her house.”
Problem: It isn’t anywhere near “around the corner” from her
house.
“[T]hat intersection was almost a mile away from
her mother’s house at the time and would have been across a major
thoroughfare,” Breitbart continued.
Remember, when an accusation is made, the
first rule of our society and our laws is that the accused are innocent until
proven guilty.
What we do know is that the timing of these
accusations is extremely odd. After decades of Moore in the public light, these
claims emerged with only weeks left in a key election that the candidate seemed
to be winning.
We also know that there are many
questions and blatant holes in
the accusations. At the same time, the media is literally scolding
and shaming any person who doesn’t buy into their narrative.
Facts should be independent of politics. In the Roy
Moore controversy, however, left wing and Republican RHINO politics seem to be overshadowing everything… and that alone should cause
people to take a step back and take a hard look at what is happening. Some of us believe that two people should go away and shut the hell up: Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton.
No comments:
Post a Comment