Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
Activist Post
Brandon is
a relatively fresh face on the alternative news scene. He does excellent work
As the stagnant and depressed United States
economy teeters on the brink of yet another collapse and the Anglo-American
ruling class court war with Russia and China, there exists a number of crises
that run the risk of exploding into full-blown chaos and resulting in a tragic
world of misery for the little people at the bottom.
While
daily news reports have no shortage of potential catastrophes, when one
considers the predictive programming being provided by mainstream media outlets
in recent months, there exists yet another cataclysmic possibility for the
United States – a massive false flag terror attack that takes place on American
soil and dwarfing 9/11 in scale.
Before
elaborating, it is important to point out that this writer is not attempting to
“predict” the next “attack,” nor am I planting my flag and claiming that such
an “attack” will definitely occur. I am, however, stating that the predictive
programming and talking points coming from the mainstream media and government
outlets are signaling just such an event.
This is
because, much like the months leading
up to 9/11, the American public is being assaulted with an onslaught
of reports suggesting the possibility of another major terror attack inside the
United States.
The narrative being inserted into news media
reports and government statements no longer revolves around terrorists
hijacking planes or blowing up specific buildings. This time, the narrative is
that there is the very real possibility that terrorists who have traveled to
Syria and Iraq in order to overthrow the governments in those countries are now
travelling back to the United States and Europe with the intention of launching
terror attacks at home.
Of course,
ever since 9/11, Americans have been relentlessly bombarded with the prospect
of more and greater terrorist attacks taking place at
home and abroad, even
while the U.S.
government openly funds the
very terrorists it uses to keep the public frightened into submission.
However,
over the last few months, and even more so in the last few weeks, reports are
being circulated in mainstream outlets not only regarding the danger of the
“Syrian rebels” returning
to their home countries with
plans to engage
in such attacks, but actual presentations of potential scenarios in
which these attacks may take place.
Unfortunately,
if “terror attacks” take place following the predictive programming narrative
that is being provided to us in the recent volley of reports, this new “attack”
might very well come in the nuclear
formand on a much wider scale than 9/11.
For
instance, consider the report “Al-Qaeda
Training British And European ‘Jihadists’ In Syria To Set Up Terror Cells At
Home,” by Ruth Sherlock, Gaziantep, and Tom Whitehead and published
by The Telegraph.
Written in
January 2014, the article states,
British people fighting in Syria are being trained as “jihadists” and
then encouraged to return to the UK to launch attacks on home soil, an al-Qaeda
defector and western security sources have told the Telegraph.
In a rare interview on Turkey’s border with
Syria, the defector from the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) said that
recruits from Britain, Europe and the US were being indoctrinated in extremist
anti-Western ideology, trained in how to make and detonate car bombs and
suicide vests and sent home to start new terror cells.
[…]
Britain’s
security and intelligence agencies believe the threat of would-be terrorists
being directed back to the UK by al-Qaeda organisers in Syria is growing.
It is feared that as genuine opposition groups
fade in the war-torn country, extremist and terror groups such as ISIS will
have an increasing influence allowing them to target more foreign recruits for
their cause. The threat from Syria is dominating the work of MI5 and the spy
agency has had to allocate more and more resources to tackling the danger in
the past six months, The Daily Telegraph understands.
In an interview with this newspaper, the
defector, known as Murad, said of the foreign fighters he met in Syria: “They
talked often about terrorist attacks. The foreigners were proud of 9/11 and the
London bombings. The British, French and American mujahideen [holy warriors] in
the room started talking about places that they wanted to bomb or explode
themselves in Europe and the United States. Everyone named a target. The
American said he dreamed of blowing up the White House.”
Tens of thousands of foreign fighters have
joined the struggle against Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria, including up to
500 from Britain. Of these, scores were already known to MI5 for their radical
sympathies.
[…]
France
and Europe risk being “overwhelmed” by the phenomenon, he [Manuel Valls, French
Interior Minister] added. Mr Valls estimated that 700 French nationals have
either travelled to Syria or returned to France – or are currently en route.
Some 21 have been killed.
[…]
He
[Richard Walton – head of Scotland Yard’s Counter Terrorism Command] said: “I
don’t think the public realises the seriousness of the problem. The penny
hasn’t dropped. But Syria is a game – changer. We are seeing it every day. You
have hundreds of people going to Syria, and if they don’t get killed they get
radicalised.”
Consider
also, the article written by Andrew G. Doran for the National Review,
published on June 16, 2014 entitled “ISIS
In The Homeland,” where Doran argues that not only do ISIS and
ISIS-style fighters have American and European passports, but that these
terrorists are already back home. Indeed, Doran claims that there are already
too many of them to properly monitor. He writes,
Thousands of these fighters are citizens of
Western countries that have visa waivers for entry into the United States – in
other words, they can travel here without any hassle at all. An intelligence
source conveyed to Lake concerns that the NSA could not “track thousands of bad
guys,” adding that “on the human-intelligence front, this is even more
difficult.” These veterans of al-Qaeda and its affiliates constitute a
fundamentally different threat than that which America faced in 2001: They are
Western (at least in nationality); they are seasoned combat veterans; they are
known, but perhaps too numerous to track.
[…]
If
these Islamist veterans of the Syrian conflict succeed in pulling off a
terrorist attack against the United States, the problem with America’s policy
in Syria will come into focus immediately. One can well imagine the hearings on
Capitol Hill: “We knew these people were coming. Why was more not done to stop
them? Why wasn’t the intelligence community given the resources it needed to
track these terrorists? Why were we sending arms to overthrow the dictator who
was trying to kill these terrorists who later killed Americans?” The
foreign-policy priorities of the present will instantly be regarded as an
unworthy distraction and forgotten. It is, of course, easy enough to ask these
questions retrospectively; it is another thing altogether to ask them in
advance — which prompts one to take notice when someone on the Hill does.
[…]
More
worrisome than tracking the small arms or TOW missiles in Syria are the ISIS
and al-Qaeda soldiers who are now in America and countries with visa waivers.
We can expect that a scramble, very much out of the public eye, is now underway
to track these hundreds – or perhaps thousands – who are plotting an attack.
Let us hope those efforts are successful.
Yet
perhaps even more revealing than the propaganda narrative unfolding amongst the
usual media suspects is the fact that former Vice President Dick Cheney is also
promoting the idea of an inevitable massive terror attack on American soil in
the near future. This is alarming because Cheney was himself implicated in the
planning of the September 11, 2001 and the propaganda
push to invade Iraq. Cheney is nothing if not an insider.
Cheney
made his own comments during an interview with Hugh Hewitt who asked if he thought the “United
States will get through this decade without another massive attack on the
homeland.”
Cheney
responded, “‘I doubt it. I think there will be another attack and the next time
I think it’s likely to be far deadlier than the last one.”
Cheney
then went on to speculate on the nature of the attack by presenting the
possibility of a nuclear attack on Washington, D.C. He stated, “You can just
imagine what would happen if somebody could smuggle a nuclear device, put it in
a shipping container, and drive it down the beltway outside Washington D.C.”
After
being asked by Hewitt if
the United States government could survive such an attack, Cheney began to
explain the Continuity of Government contingency plans that have been in place
for many years, most notably brought to the forefront during
the 1980s and again in the
early 2000s.
Hewitt
then asked, “By the way, if that were to happen do you see the government
reconstituting? Because there would have to be military rule for a period of
time at least.”
Cheney
responded,
Well, there was, some years ago, a program
called the Continuity of Government program that was part of the Cold War that
was part of the strategy that we pursued here and it basically involved having
a government in waiting if you will ready to go in the event of nuclear attack
on the United States so that we could always maintain the constitutional-based
governmental authority. I was part of that program for several years and a lot
of it, I’m sure, is probably still classified but it was very very important
and we operated and actually trained under circumstances of how would we go
about making, providing for the government to survive when we were having
nuclear weapons from the Soviet Union falling all over the country.
Later, on
ABC’s This Week, Cheney went even further
to say that “One of the things I worried about 12 years ago and that I worry
about today is that there will be another 9/11 attack and that the next time,
it’ll be with weapons far deadlier than airline tickets and box cutters.”
Cheney, of
course, is not the only high-profile figure who has suggested the possibility
of a nuclear terrorist attack inside the United States. In September, 2013, as
the rush to war with Syria was ramping up, South
Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham suggested that, if the U.S. did not use military
force against Syria, the Iranians would view America as weak and, eventually,
nuclear weapons could end up in the hands of terrorists resulting in the
bombing of Charleston Harbor.
Lindsey
Graham was quoted by FOX News as having stated that “I believe that
if we get Syria wrong, within six months, and you can quote me on this, there
will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program. My fear is
that it won’t come to America on top of a missile, it’ll come in the belly of a
ship in the Charleston or New York harbor.”
Graham’s
scenario is eerily similar to that which Dick Cheney suggested – the smuggling
of a nuclear bomb into the United States and its subsequent detonation at a
strategically sensitive location. It should be noted, however, that Graham’s
statement came on the same day it
was reported that
nuclear warheads were being shipped from Texas to South Carolina on a secret
black ops transfer. Watchman comment: at the end of Tuberville's article are the articles I wrote on Lindsey Graham and the transfer of nuclear weapons from Dyess AFB.
Regardless
of the propaganda, it should always be remembered that both al-Qaeda and ISIS
(the difference in name is largely meaningless) are products of the
Anglo-American intelligence network and have been funded, trained,
directed, organized, and armed
by the United States and NATO in cooperation
with the GCC (Gulf
Cooperation Council). If an attack of the type that Western media outlets, Dick
Cheney, and Lindsey Graham describe does indeed take place, then it is
imperative that the American people understand who is truly responsible for it.
Whether
the recent media reports and statements from Cheney and Graham are nothing more
than fear porn designed to frighten the American people into supporting another
war, a greater police state, and an even weaker economy; or whether they are
truly the predictive programming that foreshadows a massive terror attack, we cannot
allow ourselves to be caught with our pants down yet again.
The time
for preparation, educating, and talking is now. If a false flag attack of this
scale ever takes place in the United States, the time for talking and
“education” will be over.
Are the Luciferians preparing U.S. citizens for nuclear dirty bomb. Watch the link below.
Below are the articles about the transfer of nuclear bombs from Dyess AFB, Lindsey Graham and false flag attacks.
http://grassrootconservative.blogspot.com/2013/09/watchman-report-13-387-flash-us.html
http://grassrootconservative.blogspot.com/2013/10/watchman-report-13-403-update-on-dyess.html
http://grassrootconservative.blogspot.com/2013/09/watchman-report-13-395-false-flags.html
No comments:
Post a Comment