The Watchman On The Wall

The Watchman On The Wall
Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Verse 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Sunday, January 27, 2019

This Could Be "Huge"! Cela pourrait être "énorme"!



Friends and Patriots, 

This political development has the Democrats worried because Howard Schultz will split the Democrats if he runs as an independent. I do not think Schultz will get the support of the mega powerful Lubavitch Chabad Jews over Donald Trump, the hero who recognized Jerusalem as the true capital of Jerusalem and moved the U.S. there.

You know why Democrats might be jealous. The big story on their side of the aisle in this presidential election is a candidate, “Fauxcahontas” widely viewed to be both a prohibitive frontrunner and sort of boring—even by her backers, and even if her candidacy is historic because she is a woman. Meanwhile, the Republicans have that “waskley wabbit, they won't see me comin” Donald Trump!
Image result for howard schultz 2020
There’s no reason that Democrats can't have their own Trump. What it would take? Let's look at some Democratic requirements.
1. The candidate needs lots of money. Say, about $3 billion dollars
2. He or she would need to have spoken out on political issues in the past, but never have actually run for office or been seriously involved in politics.
3. This person would also have donated money to candidates of both parties
4. Ideally, the candidate should have some controversial comments about race and gender
5. Ideally, the candidate would have to be from one of New York’s outer boroughs
7. A progressive Jew would be good.
Well, here for your viewing pleasure is Howard Schultz, the CEO of Starbucks. Net worth? $3 billion. Check. Political dabbling? Check. Donations to both parties? Schultz hasn’t done much for Republicans, but he did give to “never Trumper” John McCain in 2000, so it counts, so check that box.
Unwise comments about race? Schultz’s “Race Together” campaign wasn’t inflammatory but it was widely panned. Check.

Place of birth? Brooklyn. Check.

Sports venture? Sure—Schultz used to own an NBA team in Seattle, so check that box. 

Schultz calls for “servant leadership,” including “putting others first and leading from the heart.” In your heart you knew Barry Goldwater was right, oh I digress and personally, I have noticed leading from the heart when I get my winter apple cider at Starbucks, tongue in cheek.  He says leaders need to appeal to civility and humility. Those are just the sorts of initiatives Schultz has trumpeted. Remember Starbucks’s “Come Together” campaign during the the 2013 government shutdown? Or “Race Together,” the well-intentioned but ill-fated post-Ferguson push for a race conversation? check that box. And finally, Scultz is a progressive Jew, check that box.

Well, the Democratic Party is in flux as the centrist legacy of Bill Clinton seems to give way to a party enthralled by “Fauxcahontas” and multi-millionaire socialist Bernie Sanders. Today’s Democratic Party is more confrontational, and more concerned about economic justice and social justice, and more willing to pick fights with Trump and corporate America. It’s easy to see why that direction wouldn’t appeal to someone like Schultz, an executive who sees himself bringing people together. So check that box for Howard.

Image result for howard schultz 2020

Schultz perfectly represents a portion of the Democratic Party that risks being left behind in this shift: big-city progressives, who are socially liberal, fiscally corporatist, and rhetorically sleazy. In other words, he’s the fantasy candidate of groups like AmericansElect, the failed 2012 attempt to select a Michael Bloomberg-style third-party alternative. The key word there is “failed”: Efforts like this always seem to come up short, in part because what’s on offer is really just an attempt to “repackage” and conceal the true progressive/socialist/communist Democratic Party platform Can you say Barack Obama and our big-city progressives fond of gauzy rhetoric about uniting? 

Moreover, politics is extremely hard work and "newbies" like Schultz are unlikely to quickly master the tricks. Schultz would bring one crucial skill to a campaign, he has shown he has the ability to build and manage a huge nationwide network, involving physical locations, an ability to get people to turn over perplexing sums of money, and a fan base that  is addicted to his product. check that box for Howard.
Image result for howard schultz 2020

The same is true for Schultz and Starbucks. In his first tenure as CEO, Schultz turned a tiny company into an international giant by doggedly contending the world was looking for a $4 cup of coffee. That concept may seem obvious now, but it certainly was not when Schultz bought the company in 1988, given that the coffee business in America had been in serious decline for decades.
A highly able executive in virtually every dimension of his business, Schultz also innately understood from the beginning that successfully managing his business depended on successfully managing his story. Long known as an irrepressible salesman, Schultz has always applied that same determination to engaging the news media, learning that his willful, winning personality could overcome many obstacles that would stop others.
Schultz has always been good at leveraging symbolic non-events into news. Do you remember when Schultz then famously chose to close Starbucks stores for three hours to "retrain" the baristas. Simple and concrete, the clumsy publicity stunt quickly aged.
Image result for howard schultz 2020

And then, after the Starbucks reset, as the business results began to turn positive, Schultz wasted little time in trying to dictate the narrative. Then Schultz went on a campaign to save the country from its politicians. He blended capitalism and activism. He called for a temporary boycott of corporate contributions to politicians, and selling plastic bracelets to bankroll small businesses and create jobs. 
While some speculate that those efforts reflect Schultz's desire to enter politics, the more likely explanation is that Schultz is doctor of the clever spin. Remember Schultz is your ultimate salesman, I wouldn’t trust my family or my country to this “slick salesman”.

The more he talks, the more scrutiny he invites, and on the wrong things.

 Image result for howard schultz 2020
Starbucks is to be ethical and progressive in its business practices, particularly with its procurement programs.
But when it comes to political reform and job creation, Starbucks must be careful to not flaunt one of the fundamental rules of 21st Century communication: The louder you talk, the more you are asking for the world to take a close look at your walk.
And the company is particularly vulnerable on the jobs issue, where its efforts have been anchored around the media-sexy bracelet program. While Schultz would inform shareholders only that the program has generated "millions of dollars" and created "significant new jobs," the most recent reports say the company has currently sold $2 million of bracelets, in addition to its initial $5 million donation.
That's fine, but it's approximately $58 million less than Starbucks paid Schultz in 2011. Even worse, Starbucks now employs, 149,000 people, compared with its high of 176,000 in 2008, the year Schultz returned as CEO. It's one thing to shrink your workforce to get more efficient, but it's another thing to hold yourself up as a champion of job creation and ethical progressivism while you're doing it. I believe Schultz talked the talk but he did not do the walk at Starbucks.
If the company really wanted to use its scale to create jobs, the most natural and sustainable way to do that would be by restoring the number of baristas typically on the floor to the pre-reset levels. That would shorten the wait-time for customers and keep the tabletops cleaner, improving the Starbucks experience and brand, which would ultimately pay off for shareholders. Like most of today's corporate capitalists Schultz boosted Starbucks net profit by sacrificing his people.
While some people love the Davos-lite concept of meshing capitalism with side-project philanthropy, it rarely sticks in the real world. 
Schultz has slammed Trump’s tax law, which slashed the corporate tax rate to 20 percent from 35 percent, calling it “fool’s gold” that wouldn’t help “create a level playing field and more compassionate society.”
Starbucks attempted to do just that by giving employees raises in light of the company’s tax windfall from the new law. But Schultz said his previous criticism, that most companies would forward the majority of the benefits to their shareholders, still held water.
Image result for howard schultz 2020

“I didn’t give the administration credit” for the bonuses, “I gave credit to the fact the leadership of Starbucks did the right thing,” Schultz said.
“When you’re building a great enduring company, not every business decision should be, and is, an economic one,” he said, I bet Schultz did not say that when he cut Starbucks labor costs or when he was the top national salesman!

BACKGROUND

In 1982, Schultz married Sheri Kersch; they have two children: Jordan and daughter Addison Schultz. Jordan married Breanna Hawes in September 2011; their civil ceremony was followed the same day by a Jewish religious ceremony. By the way, Howard Schultz endorses same-sex marriage.

Image result for howard schultz and same sex marriage



THE THIRD PARTY
Before there was Jill Stein, there was Ralph Nader. Before there was Nader and of course there was Ross Perot.
None of those people won and all argued that the Republican Party and the Democratic Party were basically the same, and the only way to make real change was to ditch them both. Each was blamed for siphoning off enough votes to throw the presidential elections.
These days, the difference between the parties is starker than it’s ever been in modern times. Yet here comes Howard Schultz, a Starbucks billionaire who feels that he might be the answer to American politics, and that he’d run for president as an independent.
Schultz, the former Starbucks CEO, says that he is thinking very seriously about a presidential run.
He makes clear, however, that if he moves forward, he will do so as an independent.
Already top Democratic operatives working for presidential candidates and beyond say they’re worried that the only thing he’ll accomplish is making sure Donald Trump gets re-elected. It’s more than just sniping at a prospective opponent; word that he might invest in an independent run has many of dems clearly worried about how Schultz would split votes in a general election.
Image result for howard schultz and same sex marriage


Schultz has seemed to be moving toward a run for months, with interviews and speeches around the country about the inclusive policies that he says he pioneered while in charge of the company in two stints, totaling 24 years. He also talks about his vision of America, much of it informed by a trip he took to Auschwitz, which he discusses in an emotional story.

Schultz has called our era “a most fragile time” and he has said “not only the fact that this president is not qualified to be the president, but the fact that both parties are consistently not doing what’s necessary on behalf of the American people and are engaged, every single day, in revenge politics.” Aides to Schultz did not respond to requests for comment.

“Trump’s strategy has always been divide and conquer, and this plays directly into his hands,” said one Democratic strategist, who was wary of taking on Schultz openly ahead of any announcement. “He’s Ralph Nader without any of Nader’s redeeming qualities. What’s his value proposition for America? Make America like a corporate chain?”As we can see some Democratic strategists are anti-capitalism, hence the predicament of the socialist/communist Democratic party.
Image result for howard schultz and same sex marriage
Democrats aren’t the only ones who see Schultz as potentially helping Trump win a second term. Bill Kristol, the Never Trump, neocon Republican who is most active both in media appearances and private conversations representing the GOP “resistance” to the president, said he wouldn’t support an independent run either.
“One reason my colleagues and I are focused on a Republican primary challenge to Trump, apart from the fact that we’re Republicans, is that it doesn’t present any of the problems of inadvertently helping him by being a spoiler,” Kristol wrote in an email.
Image result for howard schultz and same sex marriage
Schultz, a lifelong Democrat, would run under the theory that the answer to the political division in the country right now is moving away from party politics. There’s little evidence to support that, as people report being more polarized and partisan, devoted to their own party and demonizing the other. For all the prominent Republicans who say they don’t like Trump, the president’s overall approval numbers among voters within his party remain sky high, according to polls. Schultz would have to persuade millions of them to abandon the party to vote for him, while drawing enough Democratic votes away from a party that is energized and excited about taking out the president. Trust me, Trump’s base is not going to support the leftist/progressive same sex proponent Howard Schultz once his thoughts and feelings are made known.
And at 65, he’d have to do that as an "old white man" who’s never run for office before and has zero national name recognition. It is not good in progressive circles to be an "old white man, they are an endangered species in America" 

“There’s a lot of things I can do as a private citizen other than a run for the presidency of the United States,” Schultz said last June when he said he was stepping down from Starbucks. But he spoke in that interview about fighting for dignity, a topic he was particularly vocal about after the incident in Charlottesville, Virginia. He also said he’d delayed his own exit from Starbucks to deal with the fallout from the incident last year when two black men in Philadelphia were asked to leave one of the chain’s stores.
For the past year, Schultz has been investing in burnishing his image and strategizing by hiring a number of experienced consultants, most prominently Steve Schmidt, the 2008 campaign manager for John McCain. Schmidt has spent the past 10 years on a mea culpa tour for his hand in Sarah Palin’s selection as McCain’s running mate, which took him first to being an MSNBC contributor, then to leaving the Republican Party, and now to guiding Schultz’s effort.
Schultz wrote a book, For Love of Country, co-written with Rajiv Chandrasekaran, a former Washington Post reporter who’s been on staff with him for years and continues to be in his inner circle planning the run.
Tina Podlodowski, the Washington State Democratic chair, blasted the idea of Schultz running as an independent in the press last week. She underscored her point on Friday in a fundraising email sent to donors, with the subject line “Howard Schultz could secure Trump’s re-election.”
“This worst-case scenario keeps me up at night. I want to spend our resources fighting for Democrats up and down the ballot, not fending off Howard Schultz’s independent bid,” she wrote.
Image result for howard schultz quotes
Podlodowski has said publicly she’d like to meet with him to discuss the presidential campaign, but so far has not heard from him or his aides, according to a state-party spokesperson.
Bill Kristol, the “washed up neocon lame stream” pundit wrote that he sees a silver lining to a run that doesn’t seem to be the billionaire’s intention: “For 2019 at least, the fact that serious people like Howard Schultz are considering an independent race might help bring home to more voters, including independents and some Republicans, how important it is to replace Trump. So in that respect it’s a good thing.”

Image result for howard schultz quotes

No comments: