Reader comment: when the U.S. military “liberates” a nation, shouldn’t it result in more liberty, freedom and peace for the people living there?
Why do we find just the opposite - in fact, in every single case since 9/11, when the U.S. military has “liberated” a nation it has resulted in the persecution of it citizens and Christians in that country becoming much worse?
Is this because our government and our military are tools of the Illuminati?
Why didn’t we give these nations a U.S. style Constitution if we truly wanted to liberate Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Tunisia and Libya?
Why are churches regularly being bombed, Christians being brutally beheaded, and laws passed to make it illegal for a Muslim to convert to Christianity in areas where we spent hundreds of billions of dollars and where thousands of precious American lives were sacrificed?
What in the world did we actually accomplish spending $7 Trillion by “liberating” the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Tunisia and Libya if we were not even able to provide the most basic of liberties and freedoms to the people living in those nations with a U.S. style Constitution and Bill of Rights?
Is this why the Illuminati was formed on May 1, 1776, and along with the Deep State, for the express goal to take on and destroy America’s Republic form of government and its Constitution?................A
Your Watchman: those are excellent comments from a concerned follower of my blog and I agree wholeheartedly.
I think it is important to note that in the video below the Australian analyst said that the Australian Army pulled out of Iraq and Syria because Australia did not agree with the US policy in the region. The Austrlian noted that there are no legal military bases in Syria and the US wants a foothold in the southern and northern Syria. The US supports the Kurds in northern Syria while the Turks are trying to push the Kurds out of northern Syria. In essence, Syria has been divided and cut up by the U.S. and Turkey and de-stabilized like Libya.
Dr. Ron Paul talks about Syria
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8udpV1tJCU
https://www.trunews.com/stream/neocons-rule-trump-now-owns-obama-s-syrian-war
Russia has warned the US military twice in the last week that its
forces, along with Syrian regime units, are prepared to attack in Al Tanf where
dozens of US troops are located. Russia said that there are ISIS terrorists in
the area protected by US troops.
In Your Watchman's opinion, it seems President Trump is eager to prove to the American people that he is not colluding with the Russians and that he will confront the Russians in Syria.
US commanders are concerned that
American forces would be at risk if a Russian attack goes forward and it has
sparked US warnings to Moscow not to challenge the US military presence.
Concerns center on a US-led
anti-ISIS coalition base at Al Tanf, Syria. US troops help monitor a
55-kilometer (34-mile) exclusion zone around Al Tanf. Given its location near
the borders of Syria, Jordan and Iraq, the Al Tanf garrison is seen as a key
strategic location for the US.
The Russians could use aircraft
or their naval warships in the eastern Mediterranean to launch a missile attack
against ISIS terrorists, sparking a confrontation between US forces, Syrians
and or Russians since targeting and bombing are not precise.
So far, no buildup of Russian
ground forces has been observed.
Defense Secretary James Mattis
and Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are aware of
the latest intelligence. Keep in mind the President of Syria did not invite US
troops into his country; however, Assad did invite the Russians in order to
save his regime. Assad has repeatedly told the U.S. to remove their troops from
his country.
The American policy is that U.S.
troops have the right of self-defense if they are attacked and would not need
to ask permission from the Pentagon before acting.
"We have absolutely advised the
Russians to stay out of Al Tanf," one US official said. "We are
postured to respond."
Once again, your Watchman
questions why the United States is protecting ISIS terrorists in Al Tanf. President
Trump promised to end this Syrian policy when he ran for President
A defense official said "The
United States does not seek to fight the government of Syria or any groups that
may be providing it support. However, if attacked, the United States will not
hesitate to use necessary and proportionate force to defend US, coalition or
partner forces."
Russian complaints about the
presence of potential Al Qaeda or ISIS fighters in the buffer zone are not new,
US officials pointed out.
On another Syrian front Assad’s
government and its allies have terrorists in Idlib province surrounded and are
ready to move in for the “kill” at any time Assad is clearly the civil war in
Syrian and Syrian refugees have been returning to government controlled areas.
Below is an article about Al Tanf from 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment