Friends, ultimately we will never know the truth of the terror incident in Las Vegas. Time will pass quickly, we will forget about Las Vegas and we will move quickly to the next deadly attack.
I noticed this morning that YouTube blocked one of InfoWars videos showing flashes of gunfire from a lower window at the Mandalay Bay hotel. Fortunately, for the time being, the female cab driver's video of flashes of gunfire from a second shooter still exists.
I know this, satanic forces are working to further enslave Americans and mankind. The top level perps have moved on to the next plan of attack, they will never be brought to justice and their pawns, like Paddock, will be "terminated with prejudice" one by one just as they were in the JFK, MLK Jr., Clinton murders and numerous previous cases. However, back to the subject at hand, Las Vegas.
How did Paddock get all
those weapons into his hotel suite?
"...Jill Sneider of the ATF said that no less than 12 of the rifles found
in the room had bump-stock modifications."
"In total, there
were 23 firearms in the hotel room, including an AK-47, an AR-15-type gun, and
a handgun."
That's a lot of
weight. That's a lot of steel. How did Paddock, the purported Vegas
shooter, get all those weapons into his Mandalay Hotel suite?
Are we supposed to
believe no red flags went up? No alarms were triggered?
He had no help? No
help from the inside?
On top of that, why
did he take all those weapons into the suite? He certainly wasn't going to and couldn't use
all of them.
It's easy to say,
"He did all that because he was crazy, and there is no way to analyze
crazy." If investigations proceeded on that premise, they wouldn't be
investigations.
Confronted with this
pile of weaponry in a suite, after a mass shooting, it would be reasonable to
ask, "Did the accused shooter actually bring all these guns in
himself?" And further: "Was this some kind of set-up, carried out to
forward a "take the guns away from everybody" agenda?
Yes, that would open
the door to a very murky area---constructing an alternative time line of events
leading up to the shooting. Nevertheless, a true investigation would explore
this area. Although police and FBI aren't talking about it, you can bet a few
officers are at least looking into the possibility that Paddock had help
bringing all that weaponry into his suite.
Are we to assume the
Mandalay Hotel security system is a sieve? They just wave everyone through
without a flicker of doubt, with millions of dollars on the premises and
millions more being bet in real time in the casino? It's just a party?
Pit bosses on the
floor and eyes in the sky can spot a cheater who is counting cards at a
blackjack table, but no one is able to notice a well-known high stakes gambler
(Paddock) dragging many suitcases through the premises up into his suite?
Really?
The aftermath of the
concert shooting has turned into an ideal opportunity for gun control and a
stepped up "Surveillance State". The presence of so many guns in Paddock's suite
makes a perfect photo op for these agendas.
We discovered that Stephen Paddock isn't just a burrito-eating retiree
living outside Vegas. According to the press, he's a millionaire real estate
investor. He had many options in life but a little Valium put him over the edge. Your Watchman doesn't buy that story. But he makes a plan to end that life. He
surely knows that's what is going to happen. He wants it to happen. He launches
an operation over the course of months to bring about his death. The "lame stream" media will probably concoct the story he was terminally ill aka Jack Ruby!
Yes, it's possible.
And the Valium he's taking could push him over the edge, because it can cause
aggression in some people. Nevertheless, we're supposed to believe, without
explanation, that his impulse for destruction and self-destruction was far more
than just a moment's snap decision. It was embedded in a carefully wrought
design. Paddock laid out a sequence of events that would culminate in his
"suicide by cop." We're supposed to take that as an article of faith.
Or...was this
operation something else entirely? Was, for example Paddock, as a gun
enthusiast, profiled and targeted and used by a team intent on carrying out the
concert shooting? Yes, it is very possible he was profiled by sinister, evil people and used as patsy. Can you spell Illuminati?
Was he a patsy?
Was he a Lee Oswald,
a Sirhan Sirhan, Tim McVeigh or a James Earl Ray?
The use of patsies
varies. The set-ups can be complex. There is more than just one possible
pattern. For example, in the case of the 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing, Tim
McVeigh, to the degree he may have been involved, was only used to get a Ryder
Truck to the curb outside the Murrah Federal Building on the morning of April
19th. We do know from a video that Tim McVeigh was working at a U.S. Army explosive school. We also know that the U.S. military "sheep dips" selected people for sensitive, covert operations.
But McVeigh, the
"Ryder truck man," became the face of the crime. He was the
"lone bomber."
The patsy, the good soldier, who quietly accepted his fate for the cause.
The public is taught
to believe sophistication in the use of patsies is impossible. Patriots, the public is wrong.
The role of Stephen
Paddock in the concert shooting cannot and should not be accepted blindly as the press details
it. Paddock, in my opinion, did not play the only role in this terrorist crime.
No comments:
Post a Comment