"Fake
news!" roared Donald Trump, the work of "sick people."
The president-elect was referring to a 35-page dossier of lurid details of his alleged sexual misconduct in Russia, worked up by a former British spy. Patriots, there is no such dossier, it is like the WMD in Iraq and the attack on the Maddux in the Gulf of Tonkin.
The president-elect was referring to a 35-page dossier of lurid details of his alleged sexual misconduct in Russia, worked up by a former British spy. Patriots, there is no such dossier, it is like the WMD in Iraq and the attack on the Maddux in the Gulf of Tonkin.
A two-page summary of the 35 pages had been added to
Trump's briefing by the CIA and FBI and then leaked to CNN.
This is "something that Nazi Germany would have done," Trump said. Here, basically, is the story.
This is "something that Nazi Germany would have done," Trump said. Here, basically, is the story.
During the primaries, anti-Trump "Never Trump" Republicans hired the "alleged" ex-spy to do "opponent research" on Trump, i.e., to dig up dirt.
I believe this occurred when the "Never Trump" crowd met secretly at Sea Island, Georgia just like the nefarious Creatures From Jeykll Island that is nearby.
Your Watchman believes this group included the following people:
1. traitor John McCain 2. neocon Lindsey Graham 3. turn coat globalist Mitt Romney 4. corrupt Mitch McConnell 5. Paul Ryan surrogate for the Koch brothers 6. Karl "dirty trickster" Rove. 7. Neocon Bill Kristol and others mentioned below.
According to AppleInsider,
technology leaders, including Apple CEO Tim Cook, and government insiders met over the weekend at the
American Enterprise Institute’s annual World Forum held at Sea Island, Georgia
to plot the downfall of popular Republican presidential candidate and frontrunner
Donald Trump.
In
addition to Cook, Google
co-founder Larry Page, Tesla and SpaceX chief Elon Musk, and Napster creator
Sean Parker were in attendance at the secretive confab, along with government insiders,
including Senate Majority
Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker Paul Ryan and a number of
Republican senators. Republican strategist and former dirty trickster Karl Rove was also reportedly
in attendance.
Influential
members of the private sector were present as well, including billionaire Philip Anschutz
and The New York Times
publisher Arthur Sulzberger.
Paraphrasing
Karl Marx’s communist manifesto, leading neocon and Weekly Standard
editor-in-chief Bill Kristol
emailed from the meeting that a “specter was haunting the World Forum—the
specter of Donald Trump.”
“There was much unhappiness about Trump's emergence, a good deal of talk, some of
it insightful and thoughtful, about why he’s done so well, and many expressions
of hope that he would be defeated,” Kristol wrote.
In
December Kristol said if Trump becomes the nominee, neocons
and Republicans opposed to him will form a third party. “If the operatives I
talked with are right, Trump running as a Republican could well face a
third-party run—from the Republicans themselves,” wrote Jeff Greenfield.
Republican
leaders discussed the possibility of changing RNC rules to unbind delegates at
the convention before the first round of balloting in order to undermine Trump.
Others mulled the idea of launching a negative ad campaign against him.
Apple’s
opposition to the New York businessman is likely related to his assertion that
the tech company should face a boycott because it has thus far refused to
unlock a pair of iPhones the FBI claims are linked to the San Bernardino
shootings.
According
to sources present at the Sea Island meeting Apple CEO Cook locked horns with Arkansas Republican Senator Tom
Cotton over the encryption issue. Cotton serves on the Senate Committee
on Armed Services and Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
“Cotton
was pretty harsh on Cook,” a source told the technology website. “Everyone was
a little uncomfortable about how hostile Cotton was.”
The spy contacted the Russians. They "allegedly" told him
that Trump, stayed at a Moscow hotel in 2013, had been engaged in depraved behavior,
that they had the films to blackmail him, and that Trump's aides had been
colluding with them.When Trump won the nomination, Democrats got the dossier and began shopping it around to the mainstream media. Some sought to substantiate the allegations. None could because it is made bull*******. So none of them published the charges.
In December, a British diplomat gave the dossier to Sen. "song bird" John McCain, who personally turned it over to James Comey of the FBI.
On Jan. 7, Director of National Intelligence "liar" James Clapper and his colleagues at the NSA, CIA and FBI decided the new president needed to know about the dossier. They provided him with a two-page synopsis.
Once CNN learned Trump had been briefed, the cable news network reported on the unpublished dossier, without going into the lurid details.
Anti-Trump trolls at BuzzFeed released all 35 pages. The story exploded.
Besides Trump's understandable outrage, his Jan. 11 press conference produced related news.
U.S. intelligence agencies had for months contended that it was Russia who hacked the DNC emails and those of Clinton campaign chief John Podesta. Putin's objectives, they contend, were to damage both U.S. democracy and Hillary Clinton, whom Putin detests, and to aid Trump.
Trump had previously dismissed claims of Russian hacking as unproved conjecture, and also as being advanced to de-legitimize his Presidency.
Wednesday, Trump conceded Russia did it: "As far as hacking, I think it was Russia," adding, Vladimir Putin "should not be doing it." This is "huge" because I feel Trump was brought to this conclusion by the globalist insiders he has appointed to his cabinet and to senior military advisors. This may not bode well for those of us who hate the war mongering, one world governement types.
The stakes in all of this are "huge".
Clearly, Trump hopes to work out with Putin the
kind of detente that President Nixon achieved with Leonid Brezhnev.
This should not be impossible. For, unlike the 1970s, there is no Soviet Empire stretching from Havana to Hanoi, no Warsaw Pact dominating Central Europe, no Communist ideology steering Moscow into constant Cold War conflict with the West.
Russia is a great power with great power interests. But she does not seek to restore a global empire or remake the world in her image. U.S.-Russian relations are thus ripe for change.
But any such hope is now suddenly impaired.
The howls of indignation from Democrats and the media, that Trump's victory and Clinton's defeat were due to Putin's involvement in our election, have begun to limit Trump's freedom of action in dealing with Russia. And they are beginning to strengthen the hand of the Russophobes and the Putin-is-Hitler crowd in both parties who want an Illuminati war with Russia.
When Secretary of State-designate Rex Tillerson went before the Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Marco Rubio demanded to know why he would not publicly declare Putin a "war criminal."
The more toxic Putin-haters can make the Russian president, the more difficult for President Trump to deal with him, even if that is in the vital national interest of the United States.
The sort of investigation for which McCain has been clamoring, and the Beltway drums have now begun to beat, could make it almost impossible for President Trump to work with President Putin.
The Washington Post describes the engine it wishes to see built:
"The investigators of Russian meddling, whether a Congressional select committee or an independent commission, should have bipartisan balance, full subpoena authority, no time limit and a commitment to make public as much as possible of what they find."
What the Post seeks is a Watergate Committee like the one that investigated the Nixon White House, or a commission like the ones that investigated 9/11 and the worthless, corrupt Warren Commission that investigated the JFK assassination.
Trump "should recognize," writes the Post, "that the credibility of his denials of any Russian connections is undermined by his refusal to release tax returns and business records."
In short, when the investigation begins, Trump must produce the evidence to establish his innocence. Else, he is Putin's man.
This city is salivating over another Watergate, another broken president. But President-elect Trump should be aware of what is at stake. As The Wall Street Journal writes: "Mr. Trump's vehement denials (of collusion with Moscow and corrupt behavior) also mean that if we learn in the future that Russia does have compromising details about him, his Presidency could be over."
Yes, indeed, very big stakes.
This should not be impossible. For, unlike the 1970s, there is no Soviet Empire stretching from Havana to Hanoi, no Warsaw Pact dominating Central Europe, no Communist ideology steering Moscow into constant Cold War conflict with the West.
Russia is a great power with great power interests. But she does not seek to restore a global empire or remake the world in her image. U.S.-Russian relations are thus ripe for change.
But any such hope is now suddenly impaired.
The howls of indignation from Democrats and the media, that Trump's victory and Clinton's defeat were due to Putin's involvement in our election, have begun to limit Trump's freedom of action in dealing with Russia. And they are beginning to strengthen the hand of the Russophobes and the Putin-is-Hitler crowd in both parties who want an Illuminati war with Russia.
When Secretary of State-designate Rex Tillerson went before the Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Marco Rubio demanded to know why he would not publicly declare Putin a "war criminal."
The more toxic Putin-haters can make the Russian president, the more difficult for President Trump to deal with him, even if that is in the vital national interest of the United States.
The sort of investigation for which McCain has been clamoring, and the Beltway drums have now begun to beat, could make it almost impossible for President Trump to work with President Putin.
The Washington Post describes the engine it wishes to see built:
"The investigators of Russian meddling, whether a Congressional select committee or an independent commission, should have bipartisan balance, full subpoena authority, no time limit and a commitment to make public as much as possible of what they find."
What the Post seeks is a Watergate Committee like the one that investigated the Nixon White House, or a commission like the ones that investigated 9/11 and the worthless, corrupt Warren Commission that investigated the JFK assassination.
Trump "should recognize," writes the Post, "that the credibility of his denials of any Russian connections is undermined by his refusal to release tax returns and business records."
In short, when the investigation begins, Trump must produce the evidence to establish his innocence. Else, he is Putin's man.
This city is salivating over another Watergate, another broken president. But President-elect Trump should be aware of what is at stake. As The Wall Street Journal writes: "Mr. Trump's vehement denials (of collusion with Moscow and corrupt behavior) also mean that if we learn in the future that Russia does have compromising details about him, his Presidency could be over."
Yes, indeed, very big stakes.
No comments:
Post a Comment