During her 4 years
as Secretary of State of the United States, 2009-2014, Hillary Clinton
controlled US foreign policy. She had access to the most confidential
information and state documents, numbering in the tens of thousands, from all
of the major government departments and agencies, Intelligence, FBI, the
Pentagon, Treasury and the office of the President.
She had unfettered access to vital and top secret
information affecting U.S. policy in all the key regions of the world.
There are several questions concerning Killary:
(1) Did she work with foreign governments and intelligence services to strengthen their
positions and against the interests of the United States?
(2) Did she provide
information on the operations and policy positions of various key US
policymakers to competitors, adversaries or allies undermining the activities
of U.S. military, intelligence and State Department officials?
(3) Did she seek to enhance
her personal power within the Obama administration by pushing her aggressive, neocon policy of pre-emptive wars over and against veteran State Department and
Pentagon officials who favored traditional diplomacy and less violent
confrontation?
(4) Did she prepare a ‘covert team’, using foreign
or dual national operatives,
to lay the groundwork for her bid for the presidency and her ultimate goal of securing supreme military and political power?
Clinton’s covert war policies, which
included the violent overthrow of the elected Ukraine government, the overthrow
of the Egyptian government, the overthrow of the Libyan government and the overthrow
of the Syrian government were carried
out by her ‘Lieutenant’ Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, a virulent
neo-conservative (neocon) globalist holdover from the previous Bush
Administration. Nuland is committed to provoking Russia and China. Clinton’s
highly dangerous and economically destabilizing ‘brainchild’ of militarily
encircling China, the so-called ‘pivot to Asia’, would have required
clandestine exchanges with elements in the Pentagon, out of the State
Department and possibly Executive oversight.
In other words, within the Washington
political circuit, Secretary Clinton’s escalation of nuclear war policies
toward Russia and China required top secret correspondences which would not
necessarily abide with the policies and intelligence estimates of other US
government agencies and U.S. strategic interests.
Also Killary and Bill
Clinton conspired to sell U.S. land rich in uranium to a Russian corporation. Clinton’s
policies pushed the U.S. into a war mode against Russia and was done so Clinton
would have a willing buyer of uranium (i.e. Russia) should war come.
The fact remains
that this country could be electing a heinous traitor to the White House who
operates within an international crime syndicate. She, Bill and their daughter are
organized crime thugs. The 2016 election is about the future of our country.
Our nation now faces the problem of how to
deal with a traitor, who will be the Democratic Party
nominee for U.S. President, who will continue to undermine U.S. power.
How
do the executive leadership and intelligence agencies back a traitor for
president, who has been deeply compromised and can be blackmailed?
This
may explain why the FBI hesitates to move forward with indictments; Most of all
it explains why there is no indication of the identity of Secretary Clinton’s
correspondents in the various reports so far available.
Who did the Clinton Foundation sell uranium to? The
answer is a Russian corporation, Uranium One. This is our uranium that can be
used as a nuclear weapon against the American people. Killary needs to change
her name to Benedict Killary Clinton.
The “lamestream” media
needs to make Clinton’s treason a campaign issue on a daily basis. It is
impossible to overstate the importance of this point.
The American ship
is heading into uncharted waters with the possibility of an unethical gangster
and traitor at the helm.
No comments:
Post a Comment