The Watchman on the Wall is pleased to announce that my readership now reachs 115,000 people worldwide. Yeshua Akbar!
Jeff Berwick wrote this article.
Russia
began abolishing its outdated internal passport system back in 2011, according
to Rossiyskaya Gazeta, which tells us that such registration documents were
created during Stalin’s time to monitor domestic migration – and people’s
movements in general.
The US is
traveling in exactly the opposite direction (toward fascism rather than away
from it) with the recent dictate by the Department of Homeland Security that
certain driving licenses contravene stronger standards demanded by 2005’s
Real ID Act.
Four states
plus American Samoa were deemed to be issuing insufficiently secure drivers’
licenses and thus residents in these unhappy states will have to produce
passports in lieu of licenses when taking domestic flights.
Over 30
million people in New York, New Hampshire, Louisiana and Minnesota are going to
be affected. They have to go out and buy expensive passports to show the TSA –
one of the most ineffective bureaucracies operating in the US – that they are
legit American citizens.
The irony
is huge. A national “authority” that can hardly provide proof of stopping a
single, definitive terrorist plot is now tasked by its boss, DHS, to ensure
that millions of US citizens use “enhanced IDs.”
If there
really WERE any terrorists operating in the US, federal government agencies
might at least have a rational reason when it comes to implementing enhanced
Real ID standards. It wouldn’t be a good or democratic argument, but at least
it could provide a justification.
As it is,
the only justification for Real ID is that the 9/11 Committee recommended
stronger standards to ensure that terrorists would never be able to attack
large US buildings with impunity again.
The trouble
with the 9/11 recommendations is that the Committee`s research has basically
been disavowed by participants. Here, from SalemNews.com:
In John
Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″,
the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version… is
almost entirely untrue… The details of this massive cover-up are
carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the
9/11 Commission. Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities’ School of Law and
former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original
flawed 9/11 report. Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other
members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say
that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD?
Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.
Bear in
mind, Farmer was Senior Counsel for the Commission – and he is claiming in his
book (published in 2009) that every part of the “official version” was based on
fakery.
The above
excerpt points out that Farmer does not go so far as to accuse Bush or others
around him of ordering 9/11. However, that accusation is now being made by
another well-placed mainstream individual, the new leader of Britain’s Labor
Party, arguably one of the most powerful men in his country.
Jeremy Corbyn
has claimed that 9/11 was “manipulated” to make it look like Osama Bin Laden
was responsible to allow the West to go to war in Afghanistan. In comments that
will raise questions about his suitability to lead the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn
appeared to blame George Bush and Tony Blair for using the September 11 attacks
in New York to allow them to go to war. In a series of further articles, Mr
Corbyn also appears to endorse controversial conspiracy theories about a “New
World Order”.
Even if one
doesn’t subscribe to Corbyn’s “conspiracy theory” – that millions for good
reason don’t find conspiratorial at all – the idea that US Homeland Security is
charging ahead with what amounts to an internal US passport system is
ludicrous.
Such a
system is so bad, so entirely retrograde, that we can find its roots in the
Axis countries of the Second World War and of course in Communist countries of
the same period. It is no accident that that system came under attack after the
fall of the USSR.
The idea
that leviathan has the authority to track, trace and limit one’s travel ought
to frighten the living daylights out of any US citizen concerned with
fundamental constitutional rights.
Homeland
Security – a Bush concocted authoritarian facility – has been trying to
implement “Real ID” for years and has received so much pushback that it isn’t
much further along than it was when this disastrous nonsense was first passed
in 2005.
Yet Real ID is making some progress. It’s
unfortunate that after endless pressure many states have complied with
“enhanced ID” standards. Homeland is now targeting states that are still
holding out. Accompanying the latest, unfortunate ruling was the following
Homeland statement:
States
have made considerable progress in meeting this key recommendation of the 9/11
Commission to make driver’s licences and other identification more secure and
every state has a more secure driver’s licence today than before the passage of
the act. We will continue to work with states ahead of phase four enforcement,
which will affect identification requirements for boarding aircraft.
This
statement doesn’t mention the crux of the controversy, which is that once US
IDs are homogenized, the federal government will be able to easily implement a
“universal ID.” This sort of ID would no doubt involve regular tracking of all
US citizens and also sharply limit freedom of movement for those who were
perceived of being “enemies of the state” for whatever reason.
Getting rid
of internal passports is something that Russians have been fighting for.
Unfortunately, we read in Wikipedia that abolishment of the system has not
taken place. Instead, “universal electronic” ID cards are being rolled out this
year.
No doubt
Homeland Security is over in Russia taking notes.
No comments:
Post a Comment