The Worst Enemy Of A Religious Jew Is A Secular Zionist

Barry Chamish wrote this article, I did edit some of the article in order to clarify content

The sickening manipulation of all peoples in the exploding Middle East goes on unimpeded with nary a sane voice arising from the bloody muck. A journalist I had once worked with, Aaron Klein of World Net Daily, had recently and convincingly exposed that in 2012, the US had trained the first ISIS troops in the Jordanian town of Safawi. Now the US has re-entered Iraq by bombing ISIS, the pretext being they are threatening her good pals the Kurds and had taken over the Mosul dam. Watch out, water's a coming.
      So far about 70 Israeli soldiers have died blowing up Hamas terror tunnels into their territory. Intelligence Colonel Yossi Langotsky told the IBA (Israel Broadcast Authority) the young men had died in vain. Israel had the sonar echo location technology long ago to handle the danger: "For nine years I raised Hell and said terrorists are digging tunnels into Israeli territory but the state security system is not organized with enough seriousness to deal with the threat..."
      And while anti-semitism spreads to new levels in Europe, it has reached the shores of my Florida.  One rabbi was murdered and three Jewish bookstores burned and gutted. It's the crap from gentile friends of Israel, sent to me with good intentions and bad results, that distress me most. I received this bunch of baloney below:   

http://jerusalemwatchman.org/# /2014/08/israel-what-are-you- doing/

You pipe electricity to Gaza, drop leaflets over your intended targets to give your enemy time to escape and live to fight another day, put your own soldiers lives at risk rather than endanger the lives of Israel-hating Gazans...You send official delegates to Cairo to hold negotiations with this organization whose goal mirrors that of the Nazis – and who would enthusiastically pursue that goal if only they had the wherewithal to perpetrate against Israel’s Jews what Germany did to Europe’s. I t is as if you are negotiating with Hitler! Do you really think there is any difference whatsoever?

     I replied:

Israel was chopped like liver for a generation until it's now raining rockets. Most of the blame for the  demise comes from the Israeli rulers and their blind, moronic supporters. Everything I've written is coming to fruition.

Hamas are Nazis and Jews must destroy them before they mass-murder us, is the line towed by mainstream Jewish apologists. It is just that misreading of history that is leading us into desperate trouble all over again. The Land of Israel (Eretz Yisrael) was created over the bodies of Europe's Jews during the '40s and one Hebron rabbi, Chaim Simons, has a grasp of the real war being fought again with the same rules.

chaimsimons@gmail.com

In an article in the English edition of "Mishpacha" in January 2005 appeared the following:

"The Left is still loyal to the State of Israel in varying levels of faithfulness, but it hates Eretz Yisrael. The difference between these two is clear: Eretz Yisrael is a reminder of the Left's Jewish past, which it wishes to forget. ... The Left's disconnection from the Jewish nation has reached the point where they are prepared for settlers to be killed during the evacuation effort [Gaza area and North Shomron]. Spokesmen of the Left have already announced that this will not be a war of brother against brother since 'the settlers are not our brothers'."

At the eighteenth Zionist Congress held in Prague in August 1933, Ben-Gurion said, "Eretz Yisrael today needs not ordinary immigrants, but pioneers. The difference between them is simple -- an immigrant comes to take from the land, whereas a pioneer comes to give to the land. Therefore we demand priority for Aliyah to pioneers."

A few months later in mid-October 1933 a meeting took place between, amongst others, the High Commissioner for Palestine, David Ben-Gurion and Moshe Shertok (Sharett). The Minutes of the meeting were written up by Shertok. 

During the course of this meeting Ben-Gurion spoke about the three million Jews then living in Poland and stated that, 

"Palestine offered no solution for all Polish Jews. Immigration into Palestine was necessarily limited, therefore it had to and could be a selected immigration. Zionism was not a philanthropic enterprise, they really wanted here the best type of Jew to develop the Jewish National Home, but they had to be given sufficient scope to bring over people of whom the country was in need."

The question which remains is who would decide who was "the best type of Jew"? Ben Gurion and other Labor Zionists decided such a Jew was someone who was a secular Zionist! There was no room in Eretz Yisrael for religious Jews and old Jews.

It was a few years later at the 20th Zionist Congress held in Zurich in August 1937, that Weizmann spelled out more specifically what was meant by "selective Aliyah. (this term sounds like Final Solution to me.)"

"I told the members of the Royal [Peel] Commission that six million Jews want to go on Aliyah. One of the members asked me ' Do you think you could bring all of them to Eretz Yisrael?' On this I answered ... that two million young people... we want to save. The old people will pass. They will bear their fate or they will not. They have already become like dust, economic and moral dust in this cruel world..." 

Pinchas Gross who had been one of the public workers of Agudat Yisrael in Rumania stated,

"The first principle of the Zionist Aliyah Committee in Bucharest was not to allow members of Agudat Yisrael  (religious Zionism) to go on Aliyah to Eretz Yisrael. This was despite the agreement which had been made before the war between Agudat Yisrael and the Jewish Agency on the Aliyah quotas for members of Agudat Yisrael... Shlichim from the [Aliyah] Committee in Bucharest arrived in Transylvania with large sums of money in order to transfer hundreds of pioneers to Bucharest for the purpose of Aliyah. We also asked for our members the possibility of Aliyah but we were rudely rejected." One might think that this money was "Zionist money" and therefore it was proper to reject such a request. However, this was shown not to be the case just a few weeks later when Weissberg who was a member of the Aliyah Committee in Bucharest, gave evidence before the Rescue Committee in Jerusalem. During this evidence he stated,"It is true that the Agudah was not granted equal rights with regards to receiving money for assistance in Rumania. We did not know that the money which arrived from Eretz Yisrael was money from the Rescue Committee in which all the Yishuv participated. We thought that the money was Jewish Agency money.... I must inform you that help was not given to the pioneers and youth of Agudat Yisrael. We did not know that Agudah is a partner in matters of rescue and in particular in matters of Aliyah. Also regarding the Aliyah of the pioneers of Agudah, we did not know that they were entitled to go on Aliyah, until we arrived in Eretz Yisrael."

We can thus see that the secular Zionists did nothing to even inform the Agudah what they were entitled to, let alone implement such an entitlement.

There were also others who had been misled in believing that the money was "Zionist money". For example, the Vishnitzer Rebbe, Rabbi Eliezer Hager, testified that when he asked why the ultra-Orthodox were not receiving any money, received the answer, "This money is Zionist and it is set aside solely for Zionists."Pinchas Gross further stated, 

"The ultra-Orthodox youth were not at all considered for this [financial] assistance either in their home town or for the possibility of Aliyah. We applied... for assistance for our youth who before the war did a period of Hachshara and were no less fit for Aliyah than other pioneers -- but we did not even receive an answer. The excuse was that the money was Zionist money and was solely for them." 

This attitude of the secular Zionists in their use of public money for their kith and kin and of their "priorities" did not pass without comment, even from non-Orthodox sources.

Dr. Judah Leon Magnes in addressing a meeting of the Rescue Committee in July 1944 was very critical of those who wanted,"first of all to save the Zionists, and afterwards, if possible -- also the others, but above all the Zionists. I spoke to somebody.... The man said... we will save our men.... I said to him ... the others are also Jews. He said: It is so, they are Jews, but this is a universal argument, a perpetual argument and we will not give in on this." 

ZIONISM -- AND ONLY THEN JEWISH LIVES 

A few months after the beginning of the Second World War the Zionists received entry visas to Eretz Yisrael for 2,900 German Jews. It was necessary to have a meeting with the British Colonial Secretary, Malcolm MacDonald, in connection with these visas and in November 1939, David Ben-Gurion and Moshe Shertok met to discuss this question. Ben-Gurion strongly opposed such a meeting with MacDonald and he told Shertok that, "our political future is more important than saving 2,900 Jews." Shertok, who completely disagreed with Ben-Gurion, commented in his diary, "he [Ben-Gurion] was prepared to forgo them [the 2,900 Jews]."Even in July 1944, which was towards the end of this war, when the Holocaust was still in full progress and its implementation was already well known, Ben-Gurion still had the same attitude. A meeting of the Executive of the Jewish Agency was held in Jerusalem at the beginning of July 1944. On its agenda was the subject of the rescue of Jews.

Rabbi Baruch Yehoshua Yerachmiel Rabinowicz, the Munkaczer Rebbe in Hungary, was involved in this rescue effort and the question of a meeting with him was mentioned at this Jewish Agency meeting. In answer Ben-Gurion stated that he did not oppose such a meeting, "We must do everything in this matter [of rescue] including things which seem fantastic." Had Ben-Gurion said no more, it would have been praiseworthy, but he then continued, "But there is one condition: the work will not cause damage to Zionism." 

I n an article by the historian Dina Porat which appeared in "Ha'aretz" in 1991, she wrote, "From the moment that the State became the primary objective, the life of a Jew became secondary in accordance with the principal ‘the State of Israel is above everything’".The shortsightedness of the secular Zionist leaders in this matter was written about in 1984 by Rabbi Morris Sherer, the President of Agudat Yisrael, in his comments on the report by Professor Seymour Maxwell Finger entitled "American Jewry during the Holocaust." Rabbi Sherer commented, "Alas, they [the secular Zionist leaders] did not perceive how utterly ridiculous and heartless it was for Jewish leaders to concentrate on a postwar homeland, when the people for whom they were seeking this home were being slaughtered like sheep!" 

IF NOT ALIYAH, LET THEM PERISH 

In 1933, Hitler rose to power and during the subsequent years, more and more draconian measures, such as the Nuremberg laws were enacted against the Jews. In 1938 Hitler marched into Austria to the cheers of the non-Jewish population.

The situation for the Jews under Hitler's domination became unbearable and places of refuge became a grave necessity. It was thus at this period that President Franklin Roosevelt convened a conference of thirty-two nations at the French resort town of Evian to try and find places of refuge for Jews wanting to flee from Hitler. 

Two weeks later the Jewish Agency Executive met in Jerusalem and opposition to the planned Evian Conference was openly stated.

Yitzchak Gruenbaum said,"The Evian Conference can be expected to cause us grave damage - Eretz Yisrael could be eliminated as a country for Jewish immigration... [we are] very apprehensive that in this Conference, it could be relegated to the end of the line. We have to prevent this damage... There is the danger that whilst searching for a destination country, some new territory will be found to which Jewish immigration will be directed. We must defend our principle that Jewish settlement can only succeed in Eretz Yisrael and that no other settlement can come into the calculation." 

Unfortunately nothing concrete came out of the Evian Conference. The situation of the Jews in Germany got even worse and on 9 November 1938 there was the infamous Kristallnacht...

Since at that period emigration to Eretz Yisrael was unfortunately not a practical proposition, Weizmann  effectively said that rather than immigrate to another country, the Jews must remain in Nazi Germany.

We can see that also Ben-Gurion thought on these same lines as the other secular Zionist leaders. It was at this period that Ben-Gurion addressed the Mapai Central Committee. He realized the seriousness of the situation and said, "On these awesome days at the start of the threatened destruction of European Jewry.... If I would know that it would be possible to save all the German [Jewish] children by bringing them over to England and only half of them by transporting them to Eretz Yisrael, I would choose the second option -- since before us is not just these children but the history of the Jewish people." 

Since at that period emigration to Eretz Yisrael was unfortunately not a practical proposition, Weizmann is effectively saying that rather than immigrate to another country, the Jews must remain in Nazi Germany.

What Rabbi Simons ignores, or perhaps there is a remote possibility he genuinely doesn't know, is that without the founders of Israel, it is debatable whether there could have been the Holocaust. The Labor Zionists signed an agreement with the Nazis called The Transfer Agreement, in 1933. In short, ban all Jewish organizations but us and let us get our Jews to Israel. (The Transfer Agreement effectively doomed religious Jews to a Nazi death in Europe.)

And now who does Israel call upon to referee its latest war? Avigdor Lieberman (Israel Foreign Minister) called on our old enemy Germany to find a lasting solution to Gaza crisis, especially reviving the EU Border Assistance Mission of 2005-2007, to monitor Rafah crossing. Lieberman wants Germany to take the lead in this mission as the wealthy leader of the EU. 

Here are a few of the details of The Transfer Agreement between Labor Zionism and the Nazis:
 
"Agreement for Transferring Property from Germany to Palestine: Details of the Three Million Mark Agreement"
The Zionist Record, South Africa, September 20, 1933
The World Zionist Organization's collaborationist policy came to full frail in its Ha Avara or Transfer agreement with the Nazis. The conditions of the pact changed over the "30s, always in favor of the Hitlerites,

Berlin, August 31st
The Ministry of Economic Affairs has today published the full text of the decree providing for the transfer of Jewish property from Germany to Palestine.
The decree, which is numbered 54, and is dated August 28th, states that an agreement was
concluded "with the Jewish bodies concerned," for "promoting Jewish emigration to Palestine by releasing the necessary sums without putting excessive strain upon the foreign currency funds of the Reichsbank, and at the same time for increasing German exports to Palestine."
The Reichsbank is for this purpose opening two special accounts for the Bank of Temple Society, it states, in favor of the Anglo-Palestine Bank.
Special account No. 1, which is limited to three million marks, may be used for paying in
investment sums of more than fifteen thousand marks for buying German goods, and the amount paid in will be credited to the emigrants in Palestine pounds by the Anglo-Palestine Bank.
Special account No. 2 is designed for payments by German Jews who wish to invest in Palestine now, but are not intending to emigrate there until later.
Anyone is allowed to pay in up to fifty thousand marks, also for the purpose of buying German goods, the amount being payable in Palestine.
It is explicitly emphasized that these accounts cannot be used for other purposes than for
investment in Palestine. A special Trustee Corporation has been founded for advising
prospective emigrants.
TEXT OF THE AGREEMENT
Berlin, September 1st
The full text of the decree issued by the federal Minister of Economic Affairs setting out the terms of the agreement said to have been concluded "with interested Jewish quarters" to make possible the Transfer abroad of property belonging to German Jews, mainly to Palestine, is published here by the Boersen Courier and reads as follows:
(1) Transfer of property to Palestine.
(a) Transfer of amounts exceeding 15,000 marks necessary for establishing a means of existence.
In order to promote the emigration of German Jews to Palestine by allocating the requisite sums, without unduly straining the exchange reserves of the Reichsbank, and at the same time to increase German exports to Palestine, an arrangement has been concluded with the participating Jewish bodies on the following lines: Emigrants who have obtained the sanctions of the Emigration Advisory Office that they require sums in excess of the minimum amount of 1,000 necessary for the admission to Palestine to enable them to establish themselves in Palestine may within the limits of this sanction obtain permits to pay an amount in excess of this sum of 15,000 marks into a Special Account No. I to be opened by the Reichshaupthank in the Bank of Temple
Society, Ltd., in favor of the Jewish Trust Corporation to he established in Palestine (andpending the establishment of this Trust Corporation, in favor of the Anglo-Palestine Bank,Ltd.).
This Special Account No. 1 for which, together with a second Special Account No. 2 a total amount of three million marks is envisaged, will be administered by the Temple Bank as a trust account for the Jewish Trust Corporation referred to. The account will be used for the purpose of paying for exports of German goods to Palestine..

"The New Jewish Statesmanship"
Labor Palestine
February 1934

Labor Zionist Moshe Beilinson had previously represented Italian Zionism in pledging loyalty in the '20s to Mussolini's new Fascist regime. Now the editor of the daily Davar could soar to new heights, defending the pact with the head devil...

The meaning of the new policy is: the transfer of the Jews of Germany to Palestine. It is only for the sake of this that all those painful renunciations were made; it is only for the sake of this that the delegates to the Eighteenth Congress repressed their natural feelings.

"Between the Lines"
The Daily Bulletin
March 8, 1935
Many Zionists opposed the ZVfD/WZO collaborationists. Boris Smolar, chief European correspondent for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, the Zionist news service, spoke for them.

Zionist Overtures to Nazism Die Juedische Rundschau, official organ of the Zionist Organization in Germany, has more than once been criticized for its overtures to the Nazi government. It has been
pointed out more than once that this organ, while expressing the views of the Zionists in Germany, acts in contradiction with the interests of the general Jewish population in the Reich and with the attitude of world Jewry towards the Nazi regime.
The overture, which this official organ of the Zionists in Germany has just made, demanding from the Nazi government economic equality only, at a time when world Jewry demands the restoration of full rights for German Jews, will again give ground for a new criticism of the German Zionist Organization, which is responsible for the views expressed in the Juedische Rundschau...The Zionist organ in Berlin has long been criticized for its overtures to the Nazi regime. It has been suspected that these overtures are made merely in order to prevent any persecution of Zionism in Germany. Whether this suspicion is correct or not is actually not of importance. The important thing is that the Nazi government takes the Zionist overtures quite seriously, especially since the barter (transfer) agreements were concluded between Palestine and Germany...