A Crisis Needed To Preserve NWO

A new lament is percolating up from the depths of another DC think tank, this time, from the Atlantic Council, which is considered to be an organization of some influence, being headed by General Brent Scowcroft, the former National Security Adviser under Presidents Ford and H. W. Bush, and who also advised sitting President Obama.


In this particular instance, the message coming from the Atlantic Council is Harlan K. Ullman, current Chairman of the Killowen Group which advises government leaders, and one of the authors of the “shock and awe” doctrine that was so prominent in the opening days of the Iraq war. Ullman writes that an “extraordinary crisis” is needed to preserve the “New World Order,” which he sees as being under threat by non-state actors of the Edward Snowden stripe.

Writing in an article called War on Terror is not the Only Threat, Ullman asserts that the biggest, most fundamental forces that are reshaping the international geo-strategic system are not rising military powers like China, but rather, non-governmental actors like the hacker group, Anonymous, Bradley Manning, and most recently, Edward Snowden, because they encourage individual empowerment, which hobbles state control.

“Very few have taken note and fewer have acted on this realization,” notes Ullman, who further complains that the “information revolution and instantaneous global communications” are thwarting the “new world order” that President George H.W. Bush announced more than twenty years ago. He continues that in the absence of an “extraordinary crisis,” there isn’t much that can be done to limit, much less reverse the damage to the new world order by failed or failing governance.

The implication could not be clearer. The only way to get the plans for the new world order “back on track” is another 9/11-style cataclysm that will enable the state to re-assert its dominance while “containing, reducing and eliminating the dangers posed by newly empowered non-state actors.”
Ullman’s ultimate conclusion then is that the “elimination” of these non-state actors and empowered individuals is simply necessary in order to preserve the new world order. An overview of their material seems to suggest that the Atlantic Council’s definition of a “new world order” is a global technocracy run by some sort of synthesis of big government and big business under which individuality is replaced by transhumanist singularity.

If all of this sounds eerily familiar, it is because it is strikingly similar to the line advanced by Trilateral Commission co-founder and regular Bilderberg attendee Zbigniew Brzezinski, who in 2010 told the members of the Council on Foreign Relations that a “global political awakening,” combined with infighting among the elite, was threatening to derail the move towards a one world government.