Todd Starnes wrote the following article.
Soldiers attending a pre-deployment briefing at Fort Hood say they
were told that evangelical Christians and members of the Tea Party were a
threat to the nation and that any soldier donating to those groups would be
subjected to punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
A soldier who attended the Oct. 17th briefing told me the
counter-intelligence agent in charge of the meeting spent nearly a half hour
discussing how evangelical Christians and groups like the American Family
Association were “tearing the country apart.”
Michael Berry, an attorney with the Liberty Institute, is advising
the soldier and has launched an investigation into the incident.
“On the very base that was the site of
mass murder carried out by a radicalized Muslim soldier, it is astonishing that
it is evangelical groups that are being identified as a ‘threat.’”
- Tony Perkins, Family Research Council president
“The American public should be outraged that the U.S. Army is
teaching our troops that evangelical Christians and Tea Party members are
enemies of America, and that they can be punished for supporting or
participating in those groups,” said Berry, a former Marine Corps JAG
officer.
“These statements about evangelicals being domestic enemies are a
serious charge.”
The soldier told me he fears reprisals and asked not to be
identified. He said there was a blanket statement that donating to any groups
that were considered a threat to the military and government was punishable
under military regulations.
“My first concern was if I was going to be in trouble going to
church,” the evangelical Christian soldier told me. “Can I tithe? Can I donate
to Christian charities? What if I donate to a politician who is a part of the
Tea Party movement?”
Another soldier who attended the briefing alerted the Chaplain
Alliance for Religious Liberty. That individual’s recollections of the briefing
matched the soldier who reached out to me.
“I was very shocked and couldn’t believe what I was hearing,” the
soldier said. “I felt like my religious liberties, that I risk my life and
sacrifice time away from family to fight for, were being taken away.”
And while a large portion of the briefing dealt with the threat
evangelicals and the Tea Party pose to the nation, barely a word was said about
Islamic extremism, the soldier said.
“Our community is still healing from the act of terrorism brought
on by Nidal Hasan – who really is a terrorist,” the soldier said. “This is a
slap in the face. “The military is supposed to defend freedom and to classify
the vast majority of the military that claim to be Christian as terrorists is
sick.”
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, tells me
the Pentagon is pushing anti-Christian propaganda.
“On the very base that was the site of mass murder carried out by
a radicalized Muslim soldier, it is astonishing that it is evangelical groups
that are being identified as a ‘threat,’” he said. “Defense Secretary Chuck
Hagel must immediately intervene to stop this march against the rights and
freedom of our soldiers.”
The soldier said they were also told that the pro-life movement is
another example of “radicalization.”
“They said that evangelical Christians protesting abortions are
the mobilization stage and that leads to the bombing of abortion clinics,” he
said, recalling the discussion.
An Army spokesman at the Pentagon tells me they do not maintain or
publish a list of organizations considered extremist.
“None of these slides [shown at the briefing] were produced by the
Army, but by soldiers who included information found during an Internet
search,” the spokesman said.
He said commanders and other leaders were cautioned that they
should not use “lists of extremists, hate groups, radical factions or the like
compiled by any outside non-governmental groups or organizations for briefings,
command presentations, or as a short cut to determining if a group or activity
is considered to be extremist.”
Meanwhile, the public affairs office at Fort Hood is denying the
soldiers' allegations.
“The allegations you are asking about were brought to the
attention of the Fort Hood leadership immediately and a (sic) inquiry is
occurring,” read a statement from Tom Rheinlander, the public affairs director
at Fort Hood. “At this time, initial information gathered about the training
and what you claim occurred is not substantiated by unit leadership and
soldiers present at this training venue.”
I sent the public affairs officer additional questions about the
specific content of the briefing but he declined to respond.
But this is not the first time an Army briefing has labeled
evangelicals as extremists. Last April an Army Reserve briefing classified
Evangelical Christianity and Catholicism as “religious extremism.”
In a letter to Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.), Secretary of the Army
John McHugh said the briefing in April was an isolated incident and the
material used was not sanctioned by the Army.
McHugh said it was a “misguided attempt to explain that extremism is not limited to a single religion.”
McHugh said it was a “misguided attempt to explain that extremism is not limited to a single religion.”
Two weeks ago, several dozen active duty troops at Camp Shelby in
Mississippi, were told the American Family Association, a well-respected
Christian ministry, should be classified as a domestic hate group because it
advocates for traditional family values.
Again, the military called it an isolated incident with a trainer
using material that was not sanctioned by the military.
That explanation is wearing thin with American Christians.
“How much longer can the Army claim no knowledge or responsibility
for these things?” Berry asked.
“These repeated incidents show either that this training was
directed from Army leadership at the Pentagon, or else the Army has a real
discipline and leadership problem on its hands because a bunch of rogue
soldiers are teaching this nonsense.”
The most recent allegations at Fort Hood have drawn sharp rebuke
from religious liberty groups around the nation.
“Why is the Army engaged in these anti-Christian training
propaganda briefings?” asked Perkins, himself a veteran of the Marine Corps.
“The only explanation is that this is a deliberate effort of the Obama
administration to intimidate and separate soldiers from Christian groups that
they support and that support them.”
Ron Crews, executive director of the Chaplain Alliance, called the
military’s behavior dishonorable.
“Far from mere ‘isolated incidents,’ as the Army has dismissed
previous occurrences, this latest incident demonstrates a pattern and practice
of Army briefings identifying mainstream religions, such as Evangelical
Christianity, Judaism, and Catholicism, as examples of ‘religious extremism’
similar to Al Qaeda, Hamas and the Ku Klux Klan,” he told me.
Perkins said it’s time for the Pentagon to “ensure that
instructors carry out their role to train our troops to defend our freedom, and
not push anti-Christian propaganda.”
No comments:
Post a Comment