By: Devvy
August 9, 2004
NewsWithViews.com
On August 4, 2004, King County Superior Court Judge
William L. Downing in Seattle, Washington, ruled that homosexuals and lesbians
can marry others of the same sex. Judge Downing's justification for this ruling
was that to deny this perversion of marriage would be to deny the
constitutional rights of same sex couples. "The denial to the plaintiffs
of the right to marry constitutes a denial of substantive due process,"
King County Superior Court Judge William L. Downing said in his ruling.
This decision will be stayed until the state Supreme
Court reviews the case according to Jennifer Pizer, lead counsel in the case
for Lambda Legal Defense in the case. LAMBDA's stated mission is: a non-profit, gay/lesbian/ bisexual
transgender agency dedicated to reducing homophobia, inequality, hate crimes,
and discrimination by encouraging self-acceptance, cooperation, and
non-violence.
This operation is notorious for defending any brand of
sexual depravity, yet their web site contains no warnings about the very real
and serious health consequences of their preferred behavior. There is a section on their site called 'Youth
Outreach' designed to brainwash America's innocent and lure them into this
deadly lifestyle. The one area that organizations like LAMBDA don't want the
American people to investigate are the serious health risks of homosexual sex.
If the vast majority of the American people were made aware of the putrid,
toxic consequences of "gay" sex, it's likely fewer would support such
behavior.
Judge Downing based his ruling, as have other
politically correct judges throughout the country, by stating that homosexuals
and lesbians have constitutional rights to perform deviant acts upon one
another and should be allowed to marry, legalizing deviancy. Friends, this issue
isn't going to go away until one single question is answered that has
everything to do with someone's behavior and a "constitutional
right."
The mainstay argument of homosexuals, lesbians,
bi-sexuals, transexuals, multi-sexuals, et al, is that they are "born that
way." I say prove that there is a genetic predisposition toward
homosexuality in anyone. This is of paramount importance, otherwise anyone who
wants to engage in perverted, deviant sexual behavior, i.e. bestiality,
pedophilia, could simply claim they are born that way and are entitled to
"constitutional rights."
here is the concrete, credible scientific evidence?
One of the outstanding works available on this subject
is a book titled, My Genes Made Me Do It! (218 pgs) by Neil and Briar
Whitehead. Neil is a research scientist with a Ph.D. in biochemistry; Briar is
a writer. This thoroughly documented, footnoted book answers important
questions, i.e., is homosexuality biologically fated? Can homosexuals change
their sexual preferences? What does science really say about homosexuality?
These authors feel very few understand enough about genetics and human biology
to mount a thorough defense of the facts.
In chapter 8 they carefully analyze the flawed
findings by a homosexual scientist, Simon LeVay. While the homosexual, lesbian,
et al, community have tried to use LeVay's findings as the final word on the
question of whether someone is born "gay," this book fully documents
and exposes LeVay's skewed research. The Whitehead's aren't alone in their
criticism of LeVay's conclusions, other credible analysis on this single argument have been published.
After considerable research on this issue since 1992,
I have never found any credible,
scientific evidence that men and women are born homosexual or lesbian. Every
single study done by "gays" has been discredited or found deficient
in proving the only justification they can use to prop up their preferred,
deviant sexual behavior. This issue isn't about how nice a sodomite (one who
engages in sodomy) or lesbian might be as a person, this is a matter of legal
status being given to a class of individuals who claim their behavior is
pre-programmed before birth.
America's legal system does not extend constitutional
rights against prosecution for pedophiles or sickos who want to have sex with
animals. Nor are these groups of people given constitutional rights as a
protected class of individuals because they choose to engage in such immoral
and disgusting behavior. Absent any credible, solid scientific evidence that
someone is born "gay," then there is absolutely no way any court in
this land can justify the "right" for homosexuals and lesbians to
marry because "they're born that way." These rulings that have come
down from benches all over this country in the past six months are bogus
because they are based on a myth that is politically and financially driven.
Organizations like LAMBDA rely on popular hot button
words like human rights, human dignity, discrimination, civil rights and
homophobia to hoodwink the American people. By keeping everyone distracted with
all these side issues, the most important one - credible scientific evidence -
is pushed to the far corners of the universe. Keep people distracted with
chasing around trying not to appear homophobic or heaven forbid, deny anyone of
their human dignity! Such tactics have worked quite well as we all can see.
If I were a lawyer representing a state, city or
county fighting this battle, this is the legal issue I would raise and hone in
on it like a buzz saw: make the plaintiff(s) prove anyone is born
"gay." I certainly wouldn't fall into the trap of trying to wiggle
around the discrimination/civil rights argument or any of the other false
defense weapons of choice by homosexuals and lesbians.
If Americans choose to look the other way and condone
such filthy behavior that is a major, national health issue, it's most
unfortunate. If Americans don't mind homosexual and lesbian teachers preying on their children in the government's indoctrination centers (public
schools) where they are being brainwashed into accepting perversion as normal,
it's most unfortunate. But, here we are dealing with the law and constitutional
rights. Since homosexuals and lesbians, are not born "gay," then it
is factually and scientifically a chosen behavior and does not qualify as a
constitutional right for a protected class of citizens.
© 2004 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment