I received this article from the Natural News Network on Sunday 12 May 2013
I could be misreading the tea leaves but I do not sense Obama and Clinton are in big trouble over Benghazi as Mike Adams does. However, I have been wrong before. Reagan’s Teflon look like nothing compared to Obama. Also the next big pagan holiday is 21 June, the summer solstice or Litha, so we are 6 weeks from that pagan holiday.
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
This is a short but urgent warning: A false flag event, an act of war, a bombing or some other headlines-grabbing orchestrated event is very likely to occur in the next seven days precisely because the Obama administration is under intense fire right now and needs a quick distraction. In stage magic, it’s called the “art of misdirection.” In politics, it’s called the “Clinton method.”
This is exactly what Bill Clinton did over and over again during his administration: Any time he was about to be raked over the coals for some political scandal, he would simply order the bombing of another “terrorist factory” somewhere around the globe. Magically, the Clinton News Network (CNN) would shift coverage to this heroic act of “national defense” and stop asking questions about his scandal back at home. That would give the Clinton administration enough time to intimidate, threaten or murder whoever might have been involved. (Vince Foster, remember?)
Right now, Hilary Clinton and President Obama are facing the possible downfall of their political careers over the Benghazi cover-up. Thanks to recent testimony, we now know that the Obama administration actually ordered the stand-down of U.S. military forces, directly causing the death of a U.S. ambassador as well as those in the embassy who attempted to save his life.
This is a scandal many times more explosive than Watergate. As the Benghazi investigation unfolds, it may very well end up in the forced resignation of Obama himself.
“Greenlighting” a pre-planned operation
To avoid that from happening, Clinton, Obama and all the other globalist minions in Washington D.C. are trying to figure out what false flag scheme they have ready to go right now. They desperately need to pull the trigger on something: a bombing, a mass shooting, a hundred dead kids bleeding out on public sidewalks or something that can distract the media (and the public) from asking too many questions on Benghazi.
Hence the red zone of the False Flag-O-Meter. It’s now sitting in very dangerous territory, and the worse the scrutiny gets over Benghazi or the recent revelations that the IRS targeted conservative groups and Jews for punitive scrutiny during the 2012 elections, the more likely a false flag event becomes.
Just so you understand real history here, false flags are the primary way governments affect sweeping policy changes. They are acts of political theater played out for the purpose of causing enough real mayhem and carnage — and blaming the right culprits — so that the public will demand government action. This plays right into the hands of government which incessantly wants to concentrate power and destroy civil liberties. Every crisis that unfolds allows it to move one step closer to its goal of dictatorial police state control.
Watch for a major event in the next 7 days
Understanding this, there is a high probability of a false flag event occurring within the next seven days: A staged terror attack on a U.S. embassy, a shooting on U.S. soil, a bombing of a government building, someone blowing up a bridge… anything to get the attention off Benghazi-gate.
FBI agents are no doubt scurrying across the country right this very minute, taking inventory of all their pre-planned terror plots and trying to determine which one they can make “real” at short notice. The FBI, in case you didn’t know, openly plots and carries out terror attacks all across the USA in order to show that it’s “stopping terrorism.” This has been confirmed by the New York Times, which rarely admits anything true about terror plots.
Whatever it is, this false flag event needs to be visually and emotionally shocking. So expect children to be sacrificed as part of it. Nothing grabs headlines on CNN faster than the blood of children, and that’s what Hilary Clinton needs right now more than anything else: a powerful, revolting distraction from her own abject criminality.
And believe me, these people would order a thousand children killed if it was necessary to save their political careers. Have no illusions about the kind of power-addicted monsters who are running the U.S. government today. There is nothing they won’t do to weasel out of being caught in a devastating lie.
I hope I’m totally wrong about this prediction, but just in case you may want to be extra vigilant for the next week or so, and if something does happen, don’t believe the White House narrative which is almost 100% guaranteed to be complete fiction.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
The Washington Blog reported on May 8, 2013 that It’s Dishonest to Talk about Benghazi Without Talking About the Syrian War.
Both political parties are trying to sweep the bigger story under the rug. According to Democrats, the Congressional hearings on Benghazi are nothing but a partisan witch hunt. According to Republicans, the Obama administration committed treason in it’s handling of Benghazi and then tried to cover it up.
Friends, there is no practical difference between Republican and Democrat Parties, because the leadership of both parties is equally committed to the planned New World Order (NWO) and to its global Masonic Christ. Mass Media continually whips up the propaganda line that there is a big difference between the parties and undiscerning citizens on both sides of the political aisle believe the lie.
However, once in a while, a news story comes along which illustrates the reality that both Republican and Democrat leaders are committed to the same world and national world plan. Let us return now to our featured story.
Both parties are avoiding the bigger picture, the fact that Democrats and Republicans alike have been using Benghazi as the center of U.S. efforts to arm the Al Qaeda (AQ)-affiliated Syrian rebels. AQ is now largely in control of Libya. Indeed, AQ flags were flown over the Benghazi courthouse once Gaddafi was toppled. In 2011, Ambassador Stevens was appointed to be the Obama administration’s liaison with the “budding Libyan opposition,” according to ABC News. Stevens and the State Department worked directly with Abdelhakim Belhadj of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Belhadj has direct connections to AQ.
CNN, the Telegraph, the Washington Times, and many other mainstream sources confirm that AQ terrorists from Libya have since flooded into Syria to fight the Assad regime. Mainstream sources also confirm that the Syrian opposition is largely comprised of AQ terrorists. The New York Times reported last week that virtually all of the rebel fighters are AQ terrorists.
How long has the Obama Administration been using Benghazi as the conduit for arms flowing to the Syrian rebels?
The U.S. has been arming the Syrian opposition since 2006. The post-Gaddafi Libyan government is also itself a top funder and arms supplier of the Syrian opposition. Remember, Bush, a Republican, was in the White House in 2006. Hence, both Republican and Democrat Presidents have carried out this secret plan to arm Syrian Islamic rebel fighters through Benghazi!
Given the sensitive nature of the American operation to fund and to militarily supply the very radical Islamic forces with whom they are supposedly at war, you just know the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had to have been controlling the operation.
This brings us to the murder of ambassador Stevens. The Wall Street Journal, Telegraph and other sources confirm that the US consulate in Benghazi was mainly being used for a secret CIA operation. They say that the State Department presence in Benghazi 'provided diplomatic cover' for the previously hidden CIA mission. WND alleges that it was not a real consulate.
Reuters notes that the CIA mission involved finding and repurchasing heavy weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals. Retired Lt. General William Boykin said in January that Stevens was in Benghazi as part of an effort to arm the Syrian opposition ... Furthermore there was a CIA post in Benghazi, located 1.2 miles from the U.S. consulate, used as 'a base for, among other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles’.
If the CIA was running a "secret operation" to supply arms to Syrian rebels through Benghazi, why did the Obama Administration refuse to send the kind of commando support to keep four Americans from being murdered, including Ambassador Stevens? The CIA has an obsessive desire to keep all its activities classified top secret, sensitive compartmented information, eyes only. I believe that Langley did not want people to know that its mission in Benghazi was to funnel arms and munitions and money to Syrian rebels.
However, the secret was out in the Middle East; Islamic fighters knew the CIA was running this supply operation to the Syrian radical rebels. Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were allowed to be murdered to protect a "secret" that had been publicly known for a very long time.
While you see Republican congressmen attempting to skewer Obama officials over this mess, remember that Republican President Ronald Reagan carried out much the same illegal scheme in the mid-1980's to use profits in dealing with Iranian radical government officials so they could turn around and buy weapons for the Contra Rebels. Since Congress had already forbidden the Reagan Administration from supplying the Contra rebels, this Republican plan was very illegal.
The Iran–Contra affair was a political scandal in the U.S. that came to light in November 1986. During the Reagan administration, senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, the subject of an arms embargo. Some U.S. officials also hoped that the arms sales would secure the release of hostages and allow U.S. intelligence agencies to fund the CIA-funded Nicaraguan Contras. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.
It was planned that Israel would ship weapons to Iran, and then the U.S. would re-supply Israel and receive the Israeli payment. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the U.S. hostages. The plan deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the American hostages. Large modifications to the plan were devised by LTC Oliver North of the National Security Council in late 1985, in which a portion of the proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista and anti-communist rebels, or Contras, in Nicaragua. (Wikipedia, "Iran-Contra Affair")
But, you will say, no Americans got killed during this operation.
However, American authorities were secretly aiding and funding and arming rebels whose activities were completely at odds with our stated goals and attitudes and standards of conduct. Just as the Obama Administration secretly aided and armed the very type of Islamic rebels with whom we are currently at war, so the Reagan Administration secretly aided and armed the very type of revolutionary against whom we are supposedly at war.
Contra militants based in Honduras waged a guerilla war to topple the democratically-elected government of Nicaragua. The Contras' form of warfare was 'one of consistent and bloody abuse of human rights, of murder, torture, mutilation, rape, arson, destruction and kidnapping'. The 'Contras systematically engage in violent abuses...so prevalent that these may be said to be their principal means of waging war'. A Human Rights Watch report found that the Contras were guilty of targeting health care clinics and health care workers for assassination; kidnapping civilians; torturing and executing civilians, including children, who were captured in combat; raping women; indiscriminately attacking civilians and civilian homes; seizing civilian property; and burning civilian houses in captured towns.
When the subject is CIA involvement with dictatorial, bloodthirsty and murderous elements, both Republican and Democrat leaders will not hesitate to "deal with the devil" in order to achieve their goals. Benghazi and the war in Syria is about overthrowing an entrenched dictator, Assad. The Illuminati want instability in Syria thus allowing the Illuminati to further their goal of forming kingdom 7. Remember, there is no difference whatsoever between Republican and Democrat parties when it comes to following the New World Order and to reorganize the nations of the world into precisely the 10 kingdoms that answer to the anti-christ as prophesied in Daniel 7:7-8, 2,500 years ago!