Patriots,
I received this article from the Natural News Network on Sunday 12
May 2013
I could be misreading the tea leaves but I do not sense Obama and
Clinton are in big trouble over Benghazi as Mike Adams does. However, I have
been wrong before. Reagan’s Teflon look like nothing compared to Obama. Also the next big pagan holiday is 21 June, the summer solstice or Litha, so we are 6 weeks from that pagan holiday.
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
This is a short but
urgent warning: A false flag event, an act of war, a bombing or some other
headlines-grabbing orchestrated event is very likely to occur in the next seven
days precisely because the Obama administration is under intense fire right now
and needs a quick distraction. In stage magic, it’s called the “art of
misdirection.” In politics, it’s called the “Clinton method.”
This is exactly what
Bill Clinton did over and over again during his administration: Any time he was
about to be raked over the coals for some political scandal, he would simply
order the bombing of another “terrorist factory” somewhere around the globe.
Magically, the Clinton News Network (CNN) would shift coverage to this heroic
act of “national defense” and stop asking questions about his scandal back at
home. That would give the Clinton administration enough time to intimidate,
threaten or murder whoever might have been involved. (Vince Foster, remember?)
Right now, Hilary
Clinton and President Obama are facing the possible downfall of their political
careers over the Benghazi cover-up. Thanks to recent testimony, we now know
that the Obama administration actually ordered the stand-down of
U.S. military forces, directly causing the death of a U.S. ambassador as well
as those in the embassy who attempted to save his life.
This is a scandal
many times more explosive than Watergate. As the Benghazi investigation
unfolds, it may very well end up in the forced resignation of Obama himself.
“Greenlighting”
a pre-planned operation
To avoid that from
happening, Clinton, Obama and all the other globalist minions in Washington
D.C. are trying to figure out what false flag scheme they have ready to go
right now. They desperately need to pull the trigger on something: a bombing, a
mass shooting, a hundred dead kids bleeding out on public sidewalks or
something that can distract the media (and the public) from asking too many
questions on Benghazi.
Hence the red zone
of the False Flag-O-Meter. It’s now sitting in very dangerous territory, and
the worse the scrutiny gets over Benghazi or the recent revelations that the
IRS targeted conservative groups and Jews for punitive scrutiny during the 2012
elections, the more likely a false flag event becomes.
Just so you
understand real history here, false
flags are the primary way governments affect sweeping policy changes. They
are acts of political theater played out for the purpose of causing enough real
mayhem and carnage — and blaming the right culprits — so that the public will
demand government action. This plays right into the hands of government which
incessantly wants to concentrate power and destroy civil liberties. Every
crisis that unfolds allows it to move one step closer to its goal of
dictatorial police state control.
Watch
for a major event in the next 7 days
Understanding this,
there is a high probability of a false flag event occurring within the next
seven days: A staged terror attack on a U.S. embassy, a shooting on U.S. soil,
a bombing of a government building, someone blowing up a bridge… anything to
get the attention off Benghazi-gate.
FBI agents are no
doubt scurrying across the country right this very minute, taking inventory of
all their pre-planned terror plots and trying to determine which one they can
make “real” at short notice. The FBI, in case you didn’t know, openly plots and carries out terror attacks all across
the USA in order to show that it’s “stopping terrorism.” This
has been confirmed by
the New York Times, which rarely admits anything true about terror
plots.
Whatever it is, this
false flag event needs to be visually and emotionally shocking. So expect
children to be sacrificed as part of it. Nothing grabs headlines on CNN faster
than the blood of children, and that’s what Hilary Clinton needs right now more
than anything else: a powerful, revolting distraction from her own abject
criminality.
And believe me,
these people would order a thousand children killed if it was necessary to save
their political careers. Have no illusions about the kind of power-addicted
monsters who are running the U.S. government today. There is nothing they won’t
do to weasel out of being caught in a devastating lie.
I hope I’m totally
wrong about this prediction, but just in case you may want to be extra vigilant
for the next week or so, and if something does happen, don’t believe
the White House narrative which is almost 100% guaranteed to be
complete fiction.
Delivered by The Daily
Sheeple
The Washington Blog reported on May 8, 2013 that It’s
Dishonest to Talk about Benghazi Without Talking About the Syrian War.
Both political parties are trying to sweep the bigger story under
the rug. According to Democrats, the Congressional hearings on Benghazi are
nothing but a partisan witch hunt. According to Republicans, the Obama
administration committed treason in it’s handling of Benghazi and then tried to
cover it up.
Friends, there is no
practical difference between Republican and Democrat Parties, because the
leadership of both parties is equally committed to the planned New World Order
(NWO) and to its global Masonic Christ. Mass Media continually whips up the
propaganda line that there is a big difference between the parties and undiscerning
citizens on both sides of the political aisle believe the lie.
However, once in a while, a
news story comes along which illustrates the reality that both Republican and
Democrat leaders are committed to the same world and national world plan. Let
us return now to our featured story.
Both parties are avoiding
the bigger picture, the fact that Democrats and Republicans alike have been
using Benghazi as the center of U.S. efforts to arm the Al Qaeda (AQ)-affiliated
Syrian rebels. AQ is now largely in control of Libya. Indeed, AQ flags were
flown over the Benghazi courthouse once Gaddafi was toppled. In 2011,
Ambassador Stevens was appointed to be the Obama administration’s liaison with
the “budding Libyan opposition,” according to ABC News. Stevens and the State
Department worked directly with Abdelhakim Belhadj of the Libyan Islamic
Fighting Group. Belhadj has direct connections to AQ.
CNN, the Telegraph, the Washington Times, and many other
mainstream sources confirm that AQ terrorists from Libya have since flooded
into Syria to fight the Assad regime. Mainstream sources also confirm that the
Syrian opposition is largely comprised of AQ terrorists. The New York Times
reported last week that virtually all of the rebel fighters are AQ terrorists.
How long has the Obama Administration been using Benghazi as the
conduit for arms flowing to the Syrian rebels?
The U.S. has been arming the Syrian opposition since 2006. The
post-Gaddafi Libyan government is also itself a top funder and arms supplier of
the Syrian opposition. Remember, Bush, a Republican, was in the White House in
2006. Hence, both Republican and Democrat Presidents have carried out this
secret plan to arm Syrian Islamic rebel fighters through Benghazi!
Given the sensitive nature of the American operation to fund and
to militarily supply the very radical Islamic forces with whom they are
supposedly at war, you just know the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had to
have been controlling the operation.
This brings us to the murder of ambassador Stevens. The Wall
Street Journal, Telegraph and other sources confirm that the US consulate in
Benghazi was mainly being used for a secret CIA operation. They say that the
State Department presence in Benghazi 'provided diplomatic cover' for the
previously hidden CIA mission. WND alleges that it was not a real consulate.
Reuters notes that the CIA mission involved finding and
repurchasing heavy weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals. Retired Lt.
General William Boykin said in January that Stevens was in Benghazi as part of
an effort to arm the Syrian opposition ... Furthermore there was a CIA post in
Benghazi, located 1.2 miles from the U.S. consulate, used as 'a base for, among
other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted
from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles’.
If the CIA was running a "secret operation" to supply
arms to Syrian rebels through Benghazi, why did the Obama Administration refuse
to send the kind of commando support to keep four Americans from being murdered,
including Ambassador Stevens? The CIA has an obsessive desire to keep all its
activities classified top secret, sensitive compartmented information, eyes
only. I believe that Langley did not want people to know that its mission in
Benghazi was to funnel arms and munitions and money to Syrian rebels.
However, the secret was out in the Middle East; Islamic fighters
knew the CIA was running this supply operation to the Syrian radical rebels.
Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were allowed to be murdered to
protect a "secret" that had been publicly known for a very long time.
While you see Republican congressmen attempting to skewer Obama
officials over this mess, remember that Republican President Ronald Reagan
carried out much the same illegal scheme in the mid-1980's to use profits in
dealing with Iranian radical government officials so they could turn around and
buy weapons for the Contra Rebels. Since Congress had already forbidden the
Reagan Administration from supplying the Contra rebels, this Republican plan
was very illegal.
The Iran–Contra affair was a political scandal in the U.S. that
came to light in November 1986. During the Reagan administration, senior
administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, the
subject of an arms embargo. Some U.S. officials also hoped that the arms sales
would secure the release of hostages and allow U.S. intelligence agencies to
fund the CIA-funded Nicaraguan Contras. Under the Boland
Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been
prohibited by Congress.
It was planned that Israel
would ship weapons to Iran, and then the U.S. would re-supply Israel and
receive the Israeli payment. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything
in their power to achieve the release of the U.S. hostages. The plan
deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the
executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the
American hostages. Large modifications to the plan were devised by LTC Oliver
North of the National Security Council in late 1985, in which a portion of the
proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista and
anti-communist rebels, or Contras, in Nicaragua. (Wikipedia, "Iran-Contra
Affair")
But, you will say, no Americans got killed during this operation.
However, American authorities were secretly aiding and funding and
arming rebels whose activities were completely at odds with our stated goals
and attitudes and standards of conduct. Just as the Obama Administration
secretly aided and armed the very type of Islamic rebels with whom we are
currently at war, so the Reagan Administration secretly aided and armed the
very type of revolutionary against whom we are supposedly at war.
Contra militants based in Honduras waged a guerilla war to topple
the democratically-elected government of Nicaragua. The Contras' form of
warfare was 'one of consistent and bloody abuse of human rights, of murder,
torture, mutilation, rape, arson, destruction and kidnapping'. The 'Contras
systematically engage in violent abuses...so prevalent that these may be said
to be their principal means of waging war'. A Human Rights Watch report found
that the Contras were guilty of targeting health care clinics and health care
workers for assassination; kidnapping civilians; torturing and executing
civilians, including children, who were captured in combat; raping women;
indiscriminately attacking civilians and civilian homes; seizing civilian
property; and burning civilian houses in captured towns.
When the subject is CIA involvement with dictatorial, bloodthirsty
and murderous elements, both Republican and Democrat leaders will not hesitate
to "deal with the devil" in order to achieve their goals. Benghazi and
the war in Syria is about overthrowing an entrenched dictator, Assad. The Illuminati want instability in
Syria thus allowing the Illuminati to further their goal of forming kingdom 7. Remember, there is no
difference whatsoever between Republican and Democrat parties when it comes to
following the New World Order and to reorganize the nations of the world into
precisely the 10 kingdoms that answer to the anti-christ as prophesied in
Daniel 7:7-8, 2,500 years ago!
No comments:
Post a Comment