I
realize that the headline of this article sounds like it must be false, but it
is actually completely true. The Temple of Baal (also known as the Temple of Bel) was a world famous
landmark that was located in Palmyra, Syria. In August 2015, this temple was
destroyed by ISIS, and most of the world recoiled in terror at the loss of a
“cultural heritage site”. In an attempt to “preserve history”, two exact replicas
of the 50 foot arch that stood at the entrance to the temple will be erected in
April 2016 in Times Square in New York City and in Trafalgar Square in London.
Needless to say, a lot of people are quite disturbed by this. In ancient times,
child sacrifice and bisexual orgies were common practices at the altars of
Baal, and now we are putting up a monument of worship to this false god in the
heart of our most important city.
When
I first came across this story, I could hardly believe it. But this is not just
some Internet rumor. This was reported by the New York Times…
NEXT
month, the Temple of Baal will come to Times Square. Reproductions of the
50-foot arch that formed the temple’s entrance are to be installed in New York and in London, a tribute to the
2,000-year-old structure that the Islamic State destroyed last year in
the Syrian town of Palmyra. The group’s rampage through Palmyra, a city that
reached its peak in the second and third century A.D., enraged the world,
spurring scholars and conservationists into action. Numerous nongovernmental
organizations are now cataloging and mapping damaged cultural heritage sites in
the region.
Of course most non-religious Americans don’t
understand who Baal was, nor do they really care.
But
the truth is that many of the elements of ancient Baal worship are being
mirrored in our society in 2016. The following is an excerpt from an excellent
article by Matt Barber…
Ritualistic Baal worship, in sum, looked a
little like this: Adults would gather around the altar of Baal. Infants would
then be burned alive as a sacrificial offering to the deity. Amid horrific
screams and the stench of charred human flesh, congregants – men and women
alike – would engage in bisexual orgies. The ritual of convenience was intended
to produce economic prosperity by prompting Baal to bring rain for the
fertility of “mother earth.”
The natural consequences of such behavior –
pregnancy and childbirth – and the associated financial burdens of “unplanned
parenthood” were easily offset. One could either choose to engage in homosexual
conduct or – with child sacrifice available on demand – could simply take part
in another fertility ceremony to “terminate” the unwanted child.
Modern liberalism deviates little from its
ancient predecessor. While its macabre rituals have been sanitized with flowery
and euphemistic terms of art, its core tenets and practices remain eerily
similar.
So considering the child sacrifice and sexual
immorality that we are engaged in today, perhaps it is only natural for us to
have a Temple of Baal in Times Square.
In the ancient world, the names Baal
and Bel were often interchangeable, and they both trace back to the ancient
Babylonian god Marduk.
The following comesfrom Wikipedia…
Bel became especially used of the Babylonian god Marduk and
when found in Assyrian and neo-Babylonian personal names or mentioned in
inscriptions in a Mesopotamian context it can usually be taken as referring to
Marduk and no other god. Similarly Belit without
some disambiguation mostly refers to Bel Marduk’s spouse Sarpanit. However Marduk’s mother, the Sumerian goddess
called Ninhursag, Damkina, Ninmah and
other names in Sumerian, was often known as Belit-ili ‘Lady
of the Gods’ in Akkadian.
According
to research published by Bruce W. Warren and John A. Tvedtnes, Marduk was “a hunter god”
that was believed to have been the founder of ancient Babylon according to
ancient Babylonian tradition…
The
Akkadian name Marduk derives front the Sumerian MAR.UTU, a hunter god. He is
said to have led a revolt of the gods against his parents, after which he was
enthroned as king of the gods. In Babylonian tradition, it was he who founded Babylon (Babilu, “gate
of the gods”). His temple at Babylon bore the name E.SAGILA, “house that lifts
up the head”, and the tower associated with it was called, in Sumerian Etemenanki, “house of the foundation of
heaven and earth.” The similarity to the tower of Babel is evident.
If
you are familiar with the book of Genesis, this should remind you of Genesis
10:9 where we are told that Nimrod was “a mighty hunter
before the Lord”. And ancient Jewish tradition specifically identifies Nimrod
as the one that constructed the Tower of Babel. In addition to Marduk, other names from the ancient
world that are linked with Nimrod include Ninurta, Gilgamesh, Osiris, Dionysus,
Apollo, Narmer and Enmerkar. I know that this can get very confusing. In
the following excerpt, Peter Goodgame helps us to connect some of the dots…
In Part Eight of this study we examined evidence
that Nimrod was known in
Egypt as King Narmer, who was later deified as the god Osiris, the Lord of the
Underworld. In Part Five we looked at evidence that Nimrod was
known to the ancient Sumerians as the great King Enmerkar who attempted to
build a huge tower to the gods in the ancient city of Eridu—a city referred to
as the original “Babylon” by the historian Berossos.[1] Traditionally the Tower of
Babel event has been associated with Nimrod, and Jewish commentaries as well as
the Jewish historian Josephus both seem very emphatic on this point. Regarding
the Sumerian name Enmer-kar, the suffix “kar” means “hunter,” and so “Enmer-kar” is in
fact “Enmer the Hunter,” just as Nimrod is referred to as the “Mighty Hunter”
in Genesis 10. Furthermore, Enmerkar
is named on the Sumerian King List as “the one who built Uruk,” just as
Nimrod is described in Genesis 10:10 as having a kingdom that began in “Babel
(Eridu) and Erech (Uruk)… in the land of Shinar.” (The plain of Shinar is in
Iraq.) After Enmerkar’s
death he became honored in Sumerian myth as the semi-divine hero Ninurta,
and eventually this cult evolved into the great cult of Marduk, which became
the state religion of Babylon after the conquests and religious innovations of
Hammurabi.
According
to some traditions, the original Freemason was Nimrod. He created the very first “New World Order” in the post-flood
world, and virtually all of the major gods of ancient Babylon, Greece and Rome
ultimately trace back to him or traditions surrounding him.
But for many modern occultists, the story of
Nimrod is far from done. A
lot of secret societies and occult groups have traditions that tell them that
Nimrod/Marduk/Osiris/Apollo/Baal will someday be resurrected and will once
again rule the world.
And many Bible scholars believe that
the coming Antichrist will either be a resurrected Nimrod or will be associated
with him in some way. (It
has been a rumor for a number of years that when U.S. forces were in Iraq, the
military recovered Nimrod’s body or bones,)For an extensive examination of this
view, I would commend to you The Second Coming of the Antichrist by Peter Goodgame and Babylon Rising by Rob Skiba.
With all of the preceding in mind, could it be possible that we are
actually erecting a temple for the Antichrist in New York City next month?
If you are not religious, I know that all of
this must sound very strange. But there are occultists that take this stuff
deadly seriously, and nothing this large gets space in either Times Square or
Trafalgar Square by accident.
There are very powerful people out there that
made this happen, and perhaps someone should ask them what their intentions
are.
No comments:
Post a Comment