As if the Blood Moon tetrad, Shemitah, and Jewish Jubilee weren't enough now there is
the fact that the UN Security Council is going to be voting on a UN resolution in September which will establish a Palestinian state. Right now, France
is working on a proposed resolution which would give formal UN Security Council
recognition to the Palestinians, would declare that a divided Jerusalem is the
capital of both Israel and a Palestinian state, and would set the 1967 borders
as the baseline for future negotiations which would establish the final borders
between the two nations. It is being reported that France will submit
this resolution for a vote after the 70th session of the UN General Assembly
begins on the 15th of September. At this moment, 136
nations have already
recognized a Palestinian state, but the United States has always blocked
recognition by the UN Security Council. This time may be different
though, because there are quite a few indications that Barack Obama actually
plans to back the French resolution in September. If that happens, and
the UN Security Council approves this resolution, it is going to have enormous
implications for all of us.
Back in March, the Wall
Street Journal and
other news sources reported that the French were working on a new Security
Council resolution which will establish the parameters for a Palestinian state…
France will begin
discussions in the coming weeks on a U.N. Security Council resolution that
would set out the steps for a negotiated end of Israel’s occupation of
Palestinian land and a solution to the nearly 70-year-old Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, France’s Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said on Friday.
According to the Times
of Israel, this resolution will use the 1967 borders as the baseline
for future border negotiations, and it sets Jerusalem as the capital city for
both states…
France sees a window of opportunity after Israel’s
elections to get the United States on board with a new push for Mideast peace,
and is preparing a draft UN Security Council resolution in about 12 days,
according to French diplomatic officials.
The draft would define the pre-1967 frontier as a reference
point for border talks but allow room for exchanges of territory, designate
Jerusalem as capital of both Israel and a Palestinian state and call for a fair
solution for Palestinian refugees, one official told the
Associated Press on Tuesday.
The proposed French resolution draws heavily from a UN
resolution which established a partition plan for the land of Israel back in
1947.
The French draft is said to be based on U.N. Resolution
181, dating back to Nov. 29, 1947, which provided for the establishment of two
separate states. Called the partition plan, Israel accepted the deal, but the
Arab governments rejected it and went to war against Israel. It would have
created an independent Palestinian state on 52 percent of historic Palestine.
The current proposal is said to call for an independent
state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, creating a Palestinian
state on 22 percent of the area.
“We don’t and we won’t give up on this,”
said Francois Delattre, French ambassador to the U.N.
So when will this new resolution be brought to a vote at
the UN?
According to Haaretz,
the French hope to submit their plan for a vote when the new General Assembly
session begins in September…
The proposed French resolution will only be tabled after
the June 30 deadline set for the nuclear negotiations with Iran. The intention is to bring it to a vote in the Security
Council during the General Assembly session in New York in September.
As I mentioned above, up until now the U.S. has always
blocked any attempts to get the UN Security Council to recognize a Palestinian
state.
But now that Barack Obama is completely and totally fed up
with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that could be changing.
The following is a pretty good summary of where
things stand today White House spokesman Josh Earnest pledged on May 12 that following “the
comments made by the prime minister in the closing days of his election,” the
United States would change its approach toward promoting a solution of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Earnest was referring, of course, to Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s comment that a Palestinian state will not be established as long as he is prime minister. The
most likely assumption, based on Earnest’s words, was that the president will
replace his indulgence of Netanyahu’s
procrastination on the process with support for proposals for
resolving the conflict. Among other things, the new approach appears to include
a freeze of
the US veto at the UN
and its institutions until such time as Israel deigns to extract the two-state negotiations
from the freezer.
If the United States does not veto the French resolution
later this year, it will almost certainly pass. So right now, the only
thing standing in the way of a Palestinian state is Barack Obama.
And considering the fact that he is probably the most anti-Israel president in
our history, that is a very sobering thought.
Publicly, Obama is being very coy about what he plans to
do. But privately, it appears that he has already made up his mind.
In fact, Debka is reporting that Obama has given
France a “green light” to move forward with this resolution…
US President Barack Obama did not wait for Binyamin
Netanyahu to finish building his new government coalition by its deadline at
midnight Wednesday, May 6, before going into action to pay him back for forming
a right-wing cabinet minus any moderate figure for resuming negotiations with
the Palestinians.
Banking on Netanyahu’s assertion while campaigning for
re-election that there would be no Palestinian state during his term in office,
Obama is reported exclusively by our sources to have given
the hitherto withheld green light to European governments to file a UN Security
Council motion proclaiming an independent Palestinian state.
In addition, Debka is also reporting that officials from
the Obama administration have actually traveled to France to help draft this
new UN resolution.
To show the administration was in earnest, senior US
officials sat down with their French counterparts in Paris last week to sketch
out the general outline of this motion.
They began addressing such questions as the area of the Palestinian state, its
borders, security arrangements between Israel and the Palestinians and whether
or not to set a hard-and-fast timeline for implementation, or phrase the
resolution as a general declaration of intent.
Incorporating a target date in the language would expose
Israel to Security Council sanctions for non-compliance.
And like I discussed
earlier, we are not likely to see any action taken on this resolution until the
new session of the UN General Assembly begins on September 15th.
Global leaders hope that
this plan will bring peace but it won’t. In fact, it will just greatly
inflame tensions in the region.
In the
end, I believe that this “peace plan” will only lead to more war.
No comments:
Post a Comment