LAWFARE
WAR GAMING TO DEFEAT TRUMP IN 2020
EDWARD FOLEY, ABOVE, WROTE
"PREPARING FOR A DISPUTED ELECTION, AN EXERCISE IN ELECTION RISK"
FOLEY'S TREATISE IS 362 PAGES
IF YOU READ IT START NEAR PG 315
ATTORNEYS HAVE BEEN PLANNING THIS COUP D'ETAT AGAINST TRUMP SINCE 2019
FOLEY USES AZ. & PA. AS BATTLEFIELDS
THE CURRENT STATE OF THE ELECTION DISPUTE IS BEING PLAYED OUT AS FOLEY WROTE ABOUT IT
BELOW IS THE LINK TO HIS TREATISE
JEROME CORSI HAS BEEN SPEAKING ABOUT LAWFARE ON HIS PROGRAM CALLED "CORSI NATION"
THE LINK IS BELOW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiTm_WQkxlc
Lawfare's most prominent usage today very much concerns national security. Its first use in this context, seems to have appeared in "Unrestricted Warfare," a military strategy book written in 1999 by two officers in the People’s Liberation Army who used the term to refer to a nation’s use of legalized international institutions to achieve strategic ends.
The term “lawfare” was popularized in the modern parlance in an influential 2001 paper by then-Air Force Colonel (and later General) Charles Dunlap, who is now the Executive Director of Duke Law School’s Center on Law, Ethics and National Security.
[General Dunlap’s] most influential idea . . . is “lawfare.” I don’t think he was the first to coin the term but he certainly popularized it and was the first to analyze it seriously. General Dunlap first used the term in a 2001 paper that came on the heels of the 1999 Kosovo campaign, in which both lawyers and public debates about the legality of the war figured prominently. “Is lawfare turning warfare into unfair?,” he asked, and his basic answer was “Maybe.” General Dunlap defined “lawfare” as the “use of law as a weapon of war,” which he described as “the newest feature of 21st century combat.” The paper gave many examples of relatively weak U.S. adversaries using legal principles dishonestly and strategically to “handcuff the United States” in an effort to “exploit our values to defeat us.” After cautioning against overreaction and insisting on the importance of adherence to the law of armed conflict, he concluded that “there is disturbing evidence that the rule of law is being hijacked into just another way of fighting (lawfare), to the detriment of humanitarian values as well as the law itself.”
He expanded the definition of the term to mean “the strategy of using – or misusing – law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective.”
It is natural, I think, to see contemporary U.S. counterinsurgency (COIN) operations as an attractive form of lawfare – especially those aspects that involve the construction of legal institutions as a tool to defeat insurgents.
THERE IS ANOTHER IMPORTANT ARTICLE ENTITLED "WHO WILL DECIDE TO INVESTIGATE TRUMP"
WRITTEN DEC. 3, 2020
https://www.lawfareblog.com/who-will-decide-whether-investigate-trump
I HOPE & PRAY PRESIDENT TRUMP IS AWARE OF LAWFARE & THE STRATEGY BEING USED AGAINST HIM
I BELIEVE IF THESE EVIL PEOPLE SUCCEED THEY WILL MURDER TRUMP & HIS FAMILY
THIS IS WHAT LENIN DID TO THE CZAR IN RUSSIA
THESE PEOPLE HATE TRUMP!
No comments:
Post a Comment