Saturday, April 2, 2016

Middle East News April 2, 2016




In the video below Abu Bakr al Baghdadi's ex-wife talks about her marriage to Baghdadi. Above, McCain meets with terorists, notice the leader of ISIS, Baghdadi in the background, behind McCain. 


Baghdadi was not just detained at Camp Buca, Iraq but he was also at Camp Cropper, Iraq (pictured above) where high value detainees were kept. I remember him from my deployment in Iraq. Ask yourself this question how in the Hell did he get out of prison? Perhaps Senator McCain can answer that question! 

Also I personally believe al Baghdadi has served his purpose for the CIA and neocons and now it is time to get rid of him. It is the same game plan that was used with Osama bin Laden. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2sasKNoLMM




Alexsandr Prokhorenko, the hero of Palmyra, who died for us fighting ISIS; may God bless his soul. Click the video below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px9b2kAAcAE



Once again, Obama has openly scoffed at the reality of our national security. The White House censored Hollande's saying "Islamist terrorism". The White House briefly pulled video of a press event on terrorism with Obama, and when it reappeared on the WhiteHouse.gov website and YouTube, the audio of Hollande’s translator goes silent, beginning with the words “Islamist terrorism,” then begins again at the end of his sentence. Click the link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf0JHRKkjo0

For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come abroad. (Yeshua)



Obama said Friday April 1, that “Iran has so far followed the letter of the nuclear agreement with the six powers, but, he added, “the spirit of the agreement involves Iran also sending signals to the world community and business that it is not going to be engaging in a range of provocative actions that may scare business off,” such as testing nuclear-capable ballistic missiles, calling for Israel’s destruction and providing Hizballah with missiles.

At a news conference ending the two-day nuclear summit in Washington, Obama went on to say: “Some of the concerns that Iran has expressed, we are going to work with them to address.” But meanwhile, he said, the US and its allies are taking steps to help Iraq benefit from the agreement by facilitating trade and banking transactions with the Islamic Republic; and the US Treasury Department is seeking to set clearer investment guidelines for Iran. Wow, aren’t the globalists in our government wonderful? It looks to me that the agreement with Iran is about globalist int’l business.

Two days earlier, on Wednesday, March 30, the Obama administration was reported acting to give Iran limited access to US dollars, since the almost complete lifting of sanctions in January, which netted Tehran an injection of approximately $150 billion “hasn’t provided the country with sufficient economic benefits.”

Analysts note the inherent contradiction in the US president’s approach to Tehran: He wants Iran to be compensated with a never-ending shower of dollars for agreeing to limit its nuclear program, but “the US and its allies” cannot question how the money is spent.
So while the West, under orders from Washington, must scramble to boost the Iranian economy, Tehran may continue to test ballistic missiles until they are nuclear capable, and top up the Hizballah terrorists’ arsenal with ever deadlier tools of death.
This glaring inconsistency arises from a fact largely hidden from the world public: last year’s landmark nuclear accord was concluded by Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif – not by the real powers in Tehran, supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Revolutionary Guards chiefs and the ayatollahs at the head of the fundamentalist Shiite movement.
Indeed, even Rouhani was never allowed to formally sign the deal, much less gain Khamenei’s ratification.
But now, Rouhani’s fate depends on keeping those ruling elites happy.  He has found himself in the position of their hostage, a cash machine for keeping the funds for the Islamic Republic’s projects termed by President Obama “provocative” constantly on tap.
Those projects which are currently in full spate clearly leave every little over from the $150bn to even start lifting the Iranian economy out of its mess, while the Rouhani’s government carries the can for that too. The president is forced to earmark 50 percent of the funds released by sanctions relief for items listed under “defense”, namely, the nuclear and missile development programs, Iran’s overseas military operations, including the Syrian war, subsidizing the Lebanese Hizballah, and establishing new terrorist organizations for attacks on Israel, such as the Al-Sabirin, on the Golan.
These enterprises eat up billions of dollars. Just Iran’s operations in Syria and support for Hizballah cost Tehran $2 billion every month.
Syrian president Bashar Assad didn’t surprise anyone when he revealed that the five-year civil war in his country had cost $200 billion so far. With this kind of spending on "defense," the Iranian economy will continue to decay, while Rouhani’s government, which promised the people a better life after the nuclear accord, must bow to the will of the hard-liners or face the consequences.

Obama’s inconsistent approach to Iran has sharpened the discord between the two major political camps in Tehran and put the “reformists” in extreme peril should they dare to defy the hard-liners who hold the levers of power. Khamenei has publicly threatened to liquidate such opposition leaders as Rouhani and his ally, former president Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.

President Rouhani has been put by Obama’s policy in the position of having to keep Tehran’s hungry war- and terror-mongers flush with cash, if he is to save himself and fellow “reformists” from “liquidation.”   


The supreme leader was pretty blunt when he said on Friday, March 29, “Those who say the future is in negotiations, not in missiles, are either ignorant or traitors.” This comment underlined Iran’s overriding commitment to developing nuclear missiles and a warning to “traitors” of their fate: execution or a life sentence in a grim Iranian jail.



Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman laid out his vision for the Public Investment Fund, which will eventually control more than $2 trillion and help wean the kingdom off oil. As part of that strategy, the prince said Saudi will sell shares in Aramco’s parent company and transform the oil giant into an industrial conglomerate. The initial public offering could happen as soon as next year, with the country currently planning to sell less than 5 percent.

Sitrep in Syria and Iraq April 1, 2016; click the link below.

No comments:

Post a Comment