GARY HAMRICK
“SIGNS OF THE END
TIMES”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmdB4m6iO7w
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/radical-christians-reckon-ukraine-war-26400245
The Watchman On The Wall
Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Verse 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Monday, March 7, 2022
Watchman Report March 7, 2022 "Signs Of The End Times"
Friday, March 4, 2022
Watchman Report March 4, 2022 "Russian Group Aims to Lead Global White Supremacist Terror Movement"
Above, US Specially Designated Global Terrorists Denis Valliullovich Gariev and Stanislav Anatolyevich Vorobyev in YouTube video, June 11, 2020.
St.
Petersburg’s Russian Imperial Movement has trained foreign saboteurs
Last
May, Attorney General Merrick Garland told a Senate
hearing that “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists” posed the
most dangerous domestic threat to the United States.” And to make sure
the lawmakers knew exactly who he was talking about, Garland added:
“Specifically those who advocate for the superiority of the white race.”
A
month later, the Biden administration unveiled a national strategy to
fight the nation’s white supremacist and nationalist militia groups, requesting
Congress provide the Justice Department more than $100 million to hire more
investigators, intelligence analysts and prosecutors. The administration also
sought more resources for the State Department to investigate ties between
American white supremacist groups and the growing number of neo-Nazi
organizations in Europe and Russia.
But
nearly a year later, the administration’s legal offensive against white
supremacists at home and abroad is moving at a snail’s pace, due to a lack of
staff and a thicket of bureaucratic red tape stemming from privacy and
free-speech concerns, according to Verified, a sobering
investigative podcast produced by the Scripps news organization.
In
a recently released six-part series, Mark Greenblatt,
the Scripps Washington Bureau’s senior national investigative correspondent,
dives deep into an evolving global network of violent white supremacist
groups.
He introduces listeners to the Russian Imperial Movement,
a virulently anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant organization that is actively
working with neo-Nazi groups and individuals around the world in a push for
global white Christian power.
Greenblatt
says that while the group is not sponsored by the Russian state, it has
allegedly recruited and trained Russians to fight on the side of pro-Russian
militias in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The group seeks a purely white
Christian Russia, ruled once again by an authoritarian monarchy, preferably one
headed by a descendant of the Romanovs, who held the throne until their
overthrow and murder during the 1917 Bolshevik revolution.
In 2020, the State Department designated the
Russian Imperial Movement as a foreign terrorist organization, the first and
only time that a white supremacist group has earned the label.
The
designation, which has been most frequently used for Islamist extremists,
requires the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign assets Control to seize
any American property or assets belonging to the group. It also prohibits
Americans from having any financial dealings with the organization and bans its
members from traveling to the United States.
In
one of the podcast’s highlights, Greenblatt interviews Stanislav Vorobyev, the
leader of the Russian Imperial Movement. Vorobyev, a lawyer, military veteran
and devout follower of the Russian Orthodox Church, was labeled an individual
terrorist when the State Department designated his organization as a terrorist
group.
Despite
his terrorist designation, Vorobyev tells Greenblatt his organization is still
in contact with American white supremacists, though he declined to name them,
and is making inroads across Europe and Australia. His goal, he tells
Greenblatt, is to unite white Christian all over the world for what he calls
“the Last
Crusade,” named after the European Christian military expeditions to the Holy
Land during the Middle Ages to drive out the Muslims.
While
such plans sound delusional, Greenblatt notes this comes as Avril Haines, the
director of National Intelligence, takes seriously the influence that such
groups have on American white supremacists. Last year, she warned that the
nation’s white supremacists are the domestic extremists “with the most
persistent and concerning transnational connections” and hence “most likely to
conduct mass-casualty attacks against civilians.”
Terrorism Training Camp
In
his interview with Greenblatt, Vorobyev, speaking through a translator,
confirms the group runs two training camps outside St. Petersburg where, for
just $500, white supremacist militants and neo-Nazis from Russia, Europe and
the United States—in fact, anyone, including would-be Islamist terrorists—can
come for a week-long course to learn rural and urban assault techniques,
tactical weapons, and hand-to-hand combat.
Two Swedish members of the neo-Nazi Nordic Resistance Movement
who trained at the camps later went on to bomb several refugee centers in
Sweden in 2017. They were convicted and sent to prison. The State
Department cited their
training in its terrorist designation of Vorobyev and his group.
Greenblatt
also points listeners to an earlier U.S. government counter-terrorism strategy from 2018
that describes what it calls “a broad range of revolutionary nationalist and
separatist movements overseas whose use of violence and intent to destabilize
societies often puts American lives at risk.”
The
document cites the Nordic Resistance Movement, which it describes as “a
prominent transnational, self-described nationalist socialist organization with
anti-Western views that has conducted violent attacks against Muslims, left
wing groups and others.” It adds, “The group has demonstrated against the
United States government actions it perceives are supportive of Israel and has
the potential to extend its targeting to United States interests.”
The
Verified podcast, produced by PBS veteran Sean Powers, edited by former NPR
stalwarts Susanne Reber and Ellen Weiss, and hosted by Pulitzer Prize winner
Natasha Del Toro, adds some of its own reporting about the group, describing
how its podcast, with more
than 200 episodes targeting English-speaking audiences, acts as an effective
global amplifier of white supremacist ideology by spreading its anti-immigrant,
anti-Semitic, and anti-American ideas to its listeners. The Verified team
reports that U.S. intelligence agencies are worried that such ideas threaten to
inspire white supremacist groups and individials in the United States to attack
immigrants and minority targets at home.
The American Connection
The
Verified podcast plays a portion of one of
those episodes featuring Matthew Heimbach, a
prominent American white nationalist and neo-Nazi. He lauds the Swedish group
for “the inspiration you provide that you are on the front lines fighting the
struggle. And we're fighting the same enemy on the same barricades, and it
inspires us.”
In the last episode of
the Verified podcast, Greenblatt asks Hillary Johnson, a senior U.S.
counter-terrorism official, why the Nordic Resistance Movement still hasn’t
been designated a foreign terrorist organization, despite the fact that it was
named in both the 2018 and Biden’s administration’s strategies. At first,
Johnson describes the high legal bar on constitutional protections of free
speech and privacy that the State Department must clear before such a
designation can be made. But she finally tells Greenblatt the biggest
obstacle.
“It's
hard to do designations,” she tells him. “I've got a great designations team. .
. they would love to be able to deploy this tool everywhere,” she says.
But “we just don't have the resources and staff and the information.”
Left
unsaid is the fact that Senate Republicans blocked Garland’s funding request
for Biden’s strategy against domestic extremist violence. They accused
Democrats of politicizing the issue by describing the violent white supremacist
groups that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 last year as coming from the far
right.
But
the Verified podcast provides compelling evidence for Republicans to recognize
the foreign white supremacist extremism that threatens to incite further racist
violence here at home, and to put the country’s security ahead of their concerns
for the party’s political image.
For
Greenblatt, the son of a Holocaust survivor and grandson of a Jewish man who
fled from Russia to the United States at the end of the 19th century to escape
czarist pogroms, his encounters with Vorobyev and neo-Nazis who praise Hilter’s
slaughter of six million Jews, including members of his own family, was a
profoundly disturbing experience.
“People need to be talking
about what's going on in the world of white supremacy,” Greenblatt says. “We
have met someone who is labeled as a terrorist in today's modern day society
who wants to bring about the same kind of society that my great granddad ran
away from.”
Watchman Report March 4, 2022 "Gold At 2 Year High. Gold Up 6% In February"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watchman Report March 4, 2022 "Is Ukraine A Vital U.S. Interest?"
UKRAINE IS NOT A VITAL U.S. STRATEGIC INTEREST
Did you know the U.S. Buys $1 billion in Russian fertilizer each year! We can't grow crops without fertilizer.
Friday - March
4, 2022
"Ukraine's independence is not
vital to the United States. While a desirable goal, it is not worth our
fighting a war with Russia to preserve.... Indeed, had we given Putin
assurances that NATO was closed to Kyiv, we might have prevented what has
happened, because that was the first and most insistent of Putin's
demands."
When Hungarian
rebels arose in 1956 to overthrow the Communist regime imposed by Joseph
Stalin, President Dwight Eisenhower refused to send U.S. forces to aid the
Hungarians.
Ike would not take America to war with Russia over a small country in Central
Europe.
While the Hungarians were heroic and inspirational, Hungary was neither a
member of NATO nor a vital U.S. interest. Moreover, it was on the Soviet side
of the Yalta line dividing Europe, and agreed to by Franklin D. Roosevelt,
Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill at Yalta in 1945.
For similar reasons today, President Joe Biden has refused to send U.S. troops,
ships or planes to attack Russian forces invading Ukraine.
Though a nation of 44 million and almost as large as Texas, Ukraine is neither
a vital U.S. interest nor a member of NATO.
However, were Russian President Vladimir Putin to invade Estonia, whose
population is 3% of Ukraine's, America would be obligated to go to war with
Russia.
Does this disparity make strategic sense?
Should not America have the same freedom of action to decide whether to fight
for Estonia as we do to decide whether to fight for Ukraine? After all, Ukraine
is far larger and more populous and strategic.
In 1948, President Harry Truman refused to use force to break Stalin's Berlin
Blockade. In 1956, Eisenhower refused to intervene to save Hungary. In 1961,
President John F. Kennedy refused to use force to stop the building of the
Berlin Wall.
In 1968, President Lyndon Johnson refused to intervene when the USSR invaded
Czechoslovakia to crush the pro-democracy "Prague Spring."
Yet, today, America's leaders do not have the same freedom not to act as did
Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson. We are obligated to act. Why?
Because, since the end of the Cold War, we have expanded the membership of
NATO, and there are now 28 nations of Europe we are obligated to defend if they
are attacked.
Ukraine is not one of them, but five of them that border Russia or Ukraine —
Romania, Slovakia, Poland, Latvia and Estonia — are currently providing Stinger
or Javelin missiles to Ukraine to destroy Russian tanks, down Russian aircraft,
and kill Russian soldiers in Ukraine.
If Putin retaliated against any of these countries for these arms transfers
that are killing Russian soldiers, the U.S. would be obligated, under Article 5
of NATO, to fight Russia on behalf of these NATO nations.
Article 5 automatically conscripts the United States into a war with Russia, if
Moscow retaliates against a NATO nation providing weapons to kill Russian
soldiers.
Why have we willingly tied our own hands in this manner?
During 40 years of Cold War, America remained secure while East Germany,
Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Lithuania, Latvia and
Estonia were all under Moscow's control.
These nations are all free today as a result of the West's victory in the Cold
War. But why do all these nations have war guarantees from the United States
when none of them, as the Cold War demonstrated, is a vital interest of the
USA?
Why, after the Cold War ended in 1991, did we agree to fight a war with Russia,
including a nuclear war, on their behalf when 40 years of Cold War demonstrated
they were not essential to our security?
Today, by our refusal to intervene militarily in Ukraine, to slow or halt this
Russian invasion, we are sending a message to the world.
That message?
Ukraine's independence is not vital to the United States. While a desirable
goal, it is not worth our fighting a war with Russia to preserve.
Indeed, had we given Putin assurances that NATO was closed to Kyiv, we might have prevented what has happened, because that was the first and most insistent of Putin's demands.
The heroic rhetoric we are hearing from our political and media leaders aside, the real message sent to Ukraine by our own and NATO's actions and inaction is this:
We will send you weapons, but we are not sending our troops, and we are not going to fight your war for you, or beside you, unless and until we decide that it is in our vital interest to do so.
Fortunately, we had not brought Ukraine into NATO, nor given Kyiv a war guarantee that obligated us to risk everything for a nation deemed not vital to us.
Those who prevented the U.S. from realizing former President George W. Bush's ambition to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO may have saved us from a war with Russia in which both of us could have suffered horribly.
Whether we go to war for a nation that was formerly part of the Soviet bloc should be a matter for decision by the Americans of that day and time — not mandated, not dictated by our signature on a 73-year-old treaty, devised for another era and another world.
Watchman Report March 4, 2022 "Ukraine - Part 3 Where Does this Fit in the Big Scheme"
UKRAINE PART 3
Ladies & Gentlemen,
As noted before, this is related to global financial events -
the "reset", if I may.
The financial aspects are a key "gear" in the machine
to control this 3D world. It came up a little quicker than I expected,
but Russia has legislation, pending, before its Duma to go back to a gold
standard. This news was readily available on Thursday 03/03/22.
This morning on MSM, it was essentially ignored in early morning
broadcasts. That tells me the cabal did not either 1) expect it yet, or
2) plan well enough to initiate it (or both).
In many physical machines a gear can drive more than one mating
gear. This situation in Ukraine is no different. Remember the
currency in Zimbabwe is now tied to gold! See here...https://dinarrecaps.com/our-blog/pir-update-zimbabwe-is-now-on-the-gold-standard-7-1-2020.
Zimbabwe functioned as a pilot project. Do you remember their past
currency problems? How was that possible given their potential? See
here...https://allafrica.com/stories/201808080147.html .
They have been controlled by the Cabal, just like Taiwan.
This gear is part of the Awakening machine. We are in a
war that is not only a world war, but a worlds war. This war is on more than just the 3D world
plane. I am not talking in theoretical religious terms. Think in
terms of irregular warfare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregular_warfare,
asymmetric warfare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_warfare,
hybrid warfare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_warfare.
The divide and conquer MSM disinformation machine will talk in
terms of nation state against nation state. This is not that, it is good versus evil. Each country has a
cabal/deep state opposition. Putin has enemies internally in
Russia. Is that why Joe Biden said "go get him" at the end of
the SOTU address? Is that directly related to Lindsay Graham's comment
about Brutus? The US defined irregular warfare as "a violent
struggle among state and non-state actors for legitimacy and influence over the
relevant populations." The forces of good, or white hats, have
modified the definition to apply to international/multinational organizations
vs non-state actors. The multinationals must react and respond with
modified rules of engagement that are not yet written. This is much like
US forces reacting to insurgents who are more agile. How does a good
actor change the rules with asymmetrical tools? How about destroying the
SWIFT system by introducing this world's strongest currency - a gold backed
Russian Ruble? What hybrid element could be introduced to further expose
the cabal? How about the good actors use nation state level, well established
intelligence assets [Russian FSB assets for example] to disclose US/UK/SA/Cabal
secrets like 911 attacks, election fraud, or such things? Now Russian intelligence has the justification to use such
assets and "sell it" to their not yet awake peers. Previously there
were unwritten rules about what could be disclosed. Those rules were in part
constructed by the cabal. The gatekeepers of such rules will have a hard time
enforcing the rules if an existential threat is perceived from outside Russia.
Is the supply chain mess an organic event from a viral health
crisis (regardless of how real or planned the viral health crisis was) or was
it, in and of itself crafted in a gear of the reset machine. Wait and
read that again. I assert the "chip" shortage, for example was
completely planned and executed for a purpose and was never the result of
anything. In 2019 what was the production capacity of "chips"
world wide? What happened, specifically, to reduce this capacity?
The simple answer is absolutely nothing. Another question: even if there
was a shutdown due to the reaction to a viral health crisis, what is the
recovery time for the production infrastructure to fully recover and make up
for lost time? Answer: much shorter than the yet to complete recovery has
taken.
Is this the big scare event? We will see, and it does not
matter.
This war we are in will not play out quickly and follow a
biblical timeline with nice neat bow on top at the end of it. This may be
a big event, but it is not the end.
Fear not,………..D
Wednesday, March 2, 2022
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)