1. Donald Trump
2. General Flynn
3. Admiral Rogers
4a. Erik Prince
4b. Rudi Giuliani
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ADzOVXupEk&t=8s
The Watchman On The Wall
Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Verse 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Friday, May 25, 2018
Who Knows Where The Bodies Are Buried? ¿Quién sabe dónde están enterrados los cuerpos?
1. Donald Trump
2. General Flynn
3. Admiral Rogers
4a. Erik Prince
4b. Rudi Giuliani
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ADzOVXupEk&t=8s
Spygater Missing Since Oct. 31, 17; Spygater manquant depuis le 31 octobre 17
It seems to me that Mifsud has something to hide or someone to hide from. He is from Malta, could he be a knight of Malta KoM)???? KoM is an ancient secret society? Below Matt Bracken discusses Mifsud with David Knight after they discuss North Korea.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4olETBA5L00
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43488581
http://www.businessinsider.com/where-is-joseph-mifsud-professor-in-russia-probe-2018-3
https://jonworth.eu/joseph-mifsud-professor-papadopoulos-manafort-revelations/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Mifsud
There Is No New Q; Il n'y a pas de nouveau Q
photos from Air Force 1 proving Q is still the same Q and Rosenstein "recused" from meeting and Ed O'Callaghan is a good guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YAKVnIuke8
Excellent commentary by Lionel below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=helksxyb0kU
Rosenstein has problems, will Gowdy replace him???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6ekVuAXghQ
Tuesday, May 22, 2018
Has The Jesuit Pope Gone Crazy? Il papa gesuita è diventato pazzo?
That joking retort we
heard as children, "Is the pope Catholic?" is starting to look like a
serious question.
Asked five years ago about a "gay lobby" in the Vatican, Pope Francis responded, "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
As judgment was thought to be part of the papal job description, traditional Catholics were startled at what the new pope had volunteered.
Now the Holy Father has apparently fleshed out what he meant.
According to a childhood victim of a pedophile priest in Chile, Juan Carlos Cruz, a homosexual to whom the pope apologized, Francis said: "God made you like this and loves you like this and I don't care. The pope does love you like this. You have to be happy with who you are."
The Vatican has not denied what Cruz relates.
Asked five years ago about a "gay lobby" in the Vatican, Pope Francis responded, "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
As judgment was thought to be part of the papal job description, traditional Catholics were startled at what the new pope had volunteered.
Now the Holy Father has apparently fleshed out what he meant.
According to a childhood victim of a pedophile priest in Chile, Juan Carlos Cruz, a homosexual to whom the pope apologized, Francis said: "God made you like this and loves you like this and I don't care. The pope does love you like this. You have to be happy with who you are."
The Vatican has not denied what Cruz relates.
What makes this remarkable is that the catechism of the Catholic Church, based on the Old and New
Testament and tradition,
has always taught that homosexuality is a moral disorder, a proclivity toward
sexual relations that are unnatural and immoral. (Watchman comment the claim that Yeshua’s mother, Mary was
sinless is not in the Bible and neither is her so-called Ascension into heaven.
In short the RC catechism is not based on the Bible. Ask yourself this
question, why do we need a catechism if we already have the Bible?)
The idea that God is responsible for homosexual orientations, that the pope and the Catholic Church are fine with men being attracted to one another, and that those so oriented should be happy with it, appears, on its face, to be heresy.
It implies that what Catholics regarded for centuries as moral truth was wrong, or that moral truth has evolved and must be made to conform to modernity. This is moral relativism: Truth changes with the times.
Up until December 1973, homosexuality itself was listed as a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association.
The new morality we hear from the pope reflects a historic change in the moral thinking of the West. For the belief that homosexuality is normal and natural, and not only acceptable but even praiseworthy, has carried the day.
Legislatures and courts have written this "truth" into law. It has been discovered by the Supreme Court to be lurking in that Constitution whose authors regarded and treated homosexuality as a grave crime.
And, yet, from this historic change, questions naturally arise:
On the issue of homosexuality, have we ascended to a higher moral plateau? Or has America jettisoned the truths we believed and replaced them with the tenets of an ideology that may be politically and culturally ascendant but is rooted in nothing but baseless assertions and lies?
Consider the views of Cardinal Gerhard Muller, lately removed as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, as to what is behind the drive to have "homophobia" regarded as a mental disorder.
"Homophobia (is) an invention and an instrument of the totalitarian dominance over the thoughts of others. The homo-movement is lacking scientific arguments, which is why it created an ideology which wants to dominate by creating its own reality."
In short, cultural Marxists and their progressive allies have taken an ideological assertion — homosexuality is normal, natural and moral — without any historical, biological or scientific basis, and asserted it as truth, established it as law, and demanded that we accept and act upon this truth, or face the wrath of the regime. Hmmm, seems like the blood ideology of the Nazis.
Said Muller: "It is the Marxist pattern according to which reality does not create thinking, but thinking creates its own reality. He who does not accept this created reality is to be considered as being sick.
"It is as if one could influence an illness with the help of the police or with the help of courts. In the Soviet Union, Christians were put into psychiatric clinics. These are the methods of totalitarian regimes, of National Socialism and of Communism."
As Russell Kirk wrote, ideology is political religion. And the dogmas of the political religion by which we are increasingly ruled have displaced the teachings of Christianity.
Since the Stonewall Riot of 1969, homosexual relationships have gone from being seen as indecent and immoral, to being tolerated, to being accepted, to being on the same plane as traditional marriage, to being a constitutional right.
And if you do not accept the new morality, you are a deplorable bigot. And if you act on your disbelief in the equality of homosexuality, you will be ostracized and punished.
The truths being jettisoned built the greatest civilization known to man. Will the invented truths of our new egalitarianism survive the arrival of the new barbarians? It's not looking all that good right now.
The idea that God is responsible for homosexual orientations, that the pope and the Catholic Church are fine with men being attracted to one another, and that those so oriented should be happy with it, appears, on its face, to be heresy.
It implies that what Catholics regarded for centuries as moral truth was wrong, or that moral truth has evolved and must be made to conform to modernity. This is moral relativism: Truth changes with the times.
Up until December 1973, homosexuality itself was listed as a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association.
The new morality we hear from the pope reflects a historic change in the moral thinking of the West. For the belief that homosexuality is normal and natural, and not only acceptable but even praiseworthy, has carried the day.
Legislatures and courts have written this "truth" into law. It has been discovered by the Supreme Court to be lurking in that Constitution whose authors regarded and treated homosexuality as a grave crime.
And, yet, from this historic change, questions naturally arise:
On the issue of homosexuality, have we ascended to a higher moral plateau? Or has America jettisoned the truths we believed and replaced them with the tenets of an ideology that may be politically and culturally ascendant but is rooted in nothing but baseless assertions and lies?
Consider the views of Cardinal Gerhard Muller, lately removed as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, as to what is behind the drive to have "homophobia" regarded as a mental disorder.
"Homophobia (is) an invention and an instrument of the totalitarian dominance over the thoughts of others. The homo-movement is lacking scientific arguments, which is why it created an ideology which wants to dominate by creating its own reality."
In short, cultural Marxists and their progressive allies have taken an ideological assertion — homosexuality is normal, natural and moral — without any historical, biological or scientific basis, and asserted it as truth, established it as law, and demanded that we accept and act upon this truth, or face the wrath of the regime. Hmmm, seems like the blood ideology of the Nazis.
Said Muller: "It is the Marxist pattern according to which reality does not create thinking, but thinking creates its own reality. He who does not accept this created reality is to be considered as being sick.
"It is as if one could influence an illness with the help of the police or with the help of courts. In the Soviet Union, Christians were put into psychiatric clinics. These are the methods of totalitarian regimes, of National Socialism and of Communism."
As Russell Kirk wrote, ideology is political religion. And the dogmas of the political religion by which we are increasingly ruled have displaced the teachings of Christianity.
Since the Stonewall Riot of 1969, homosexual relationships have gone from being seen as indecent and immoral, to being tolerated, to being accepted, to being on the same plane as traditional marriage, to being a constitutional right.
And if you do not accept the new morality, you are a deplorable bigot. And if you act on your disbelief in the equality of homosexuality, you will be ostracized and punished.
The truths being jettisoned built the greatest civilization known to man. Will the invented truths of our new egalitarianism survive the arrival of the new barbarians? It's not looking all that good right now.
Part
2
POPE
Francis has told a gay man that God loves him during a private meeting, it has
been claimed.
In a private dialogue, the Pontiff is understood to
have told Juan Carlos Cruz, a victim of sexual abuse at the hands of Catholic
priests, that God loves gay people and it is fine to be homosexual.
The
comments are the most striking public acceptance about homosexuality ever made
by a head of the Roman Catholic Church.
The remarks were made during a private meeting at
the Vatican between the pair, in which the Pope offered
a heartfelt apology. Perhaps one the motivations of the Jesuit Pope was that he
is tired of all the law suits against the RC Church for pedophilia.
Cruz was a victim of Chile’s most notorious
pedophile priest Fernando Karadima.
Father Karadima, now aged 87, was found guilty of
sexual abuse by the Vatican in 2011.
Cruz
claims that his suffering was ignored by a number of Latin American bishops who
used his homosexuality to brand him a liar when he spoke out.
Cruz said: “He [the Pope] told me, ‘Juan Carlos,
that you are gay does not matter.
“God made you like this and loves you like this and
I don’t care.
“The pope loves you like this. You have to be happy
with who you are.”
The Pope’s words signal a much more open and
inclusive approach by the often restrictive faith – a move which will likely
upset many conservative Catholics. Dah!!!!
This is not the first time Pope
Francis’ comments have suggested a more open and tolerant attitude toward
homosexuality.
The Catholic Church teaches that gay
sex – and all sex outside of heterosexual marriage – is a sin.
This is not the first time Pope Francis’
comments have suggested a more open and tolerant attitude toward homosexuality.
In July 2013, when responding to a reporter’s
question about the existence of an alleged “gay lobby” within the Vatican, Pope
Francis said: “If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
Well, aren’t you supposedly the bridge or mediator between RC laymen and Jesus
Christ? Or have you abrogated that role? This is like a legal jury telling the judge who are we to judge?
The Pontiff’s most recent remarks come as several
high profile members of the clergy have sought to publicly make amends with gay
Catholics, many of whom say they feel shunned an d unwelcome in the church.
It is the most striking public
acceptance about homosexuality ever made by a Pontiff.
Juan Carlos Cruz was one of three former sex abuse
victims from Chile who were summoned to Rome to receive an apology from the
Pontiff for years of abuse endured by them as children.
The victims described clerical sexual abuse as “an
epidemic that has destroyed thousands of lives.”
Initially, the Pope had been slow to realize the
gravity of the crisis in Chile, at one point even coming to the defense of a
controversial bishop linked to Father Karadima.
However, he swiftly changed his stance after
Vatican investigators presented him with a 2,300-page dossier documenting the sexual abuse of
minors that had been covered up in Chile for decades. Unlike the Trump dossier,
the Chilean dossier was not fake.
Last week, Chile’s 34 bishops offered to resign enmasse over the abuse scandal, in an unprecedented move in the history of the
Catholic Church.
Friends, what is happening here is that the Pope is
the foreshadowing of the “False Prophet” spreading errors and false doctrine to
the world. Naming a Jesuit to be Pope was a major mistake by the RC hierarchy.
Monday, May 21, 2018
The Spy Has Come In From The Cold; Шпион пришел из холода Shpion prishel iz kholoda
We should
have known that a Bush henchman would be involved in this spying.
Well, you
see, the mole wasn't a spy, he was an informant. Aha. Let's use a microscope to
tell the difference.
The mole:
Stefan Halper, a Cambridge professor.
Supposedly,
Halper was gathering information for the FBI about a suspected Trump-Russia
connection.
Well,
what else has Halper done? At The Intercept, Glenn Greenwald reports: "Four decades ago, Halper
was responsible for a long-forgotten spying scandal involving the 1980
election, in which the Reagan campaign - using CIA officials managed by Halper,
reportedly under the direction of former CIA Director and
then-Vice-Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush - got caught running a spying
operation from inside the Carter administration. The plot involved CIA
operatives passing classified information about Carter's foreign policy to
Reagan campaign officials in order to ensure the Reagan campaign knew of any
foreign policy decisions that Carter was considering."
Oops.
That doesn't smell good. CIA operatives, managed by Halper, infiltrated the
presidential campaign, spied on Jimmy Carter and his advisors, and relayed
information about Carter's foreign policy to Reagan's team.
But we're
supposed to believe, without evidence, that in 2016 Halper was only trying to
dig up information on a Trump-Russia connection.
What more do we know about Stefan
Halper, the mole for hire? Breitbart: "Halper...served as an assistant to
all three of President Gerald Ford's Chief of Staffs - Alexander Haig, Donald
Rumsfeld, and Dick Cheney..." Quite a trio of politicians. I don't think
you'd want to list them on your resume, if you were applying for a job with an
organization that showed a shred of ethics.
And then there is this: In 1984, Halper
was the chairman of the Palmer National Bank. Breitbart: "White House
official Oliver North wiredloaned funds from the Palmer National
Bank to a Swiss bank account, which were later used to aid the [Nicaraguan]
contras." The contras, backed by the CIA, were trying to derail the
Sandinista government, and in the process, reportedly carried out over 1000
terrorist attacks. Transferring funds from the US to the contras was illegal.
Glenn Greenwald: "...the CIA
operative and FBI informant [Stefan Halper] used to gather information on the
Trump campaign in the 2016 campaign has, for weeks, been falsely depicted as a
sensitive intelligence asset rather than what he actually is: a long-time CIA
operative with extensive links to the Bush family who was responsible for a
dirty and likely illegal spying operation in the 1980 presidential
election."
But don't
worry. Nothing untoward is going on here. The FBI merely needed a man on the
inside of the Trump campaign, to make sure Russia wasn't exercising undue
influence on the 2016 presidential election. Nothing more. No problem. Just ask
the FBI. They'll confirm this. The FBI high echelon is squeaky clean. They
never lie.
One other
thing. Stefan Halper's
father-in-law was Ray Cline, an infamous CIA agent. From Wikispooks:
"Cline has been an outspoken proponent of disinformation and direct
manipulation of the press by the CIA. In testimony before the House Select
Committee on Intelligence, Cline defended the use of such covert devices as
black propaganda and the funding of journalists, arguing that 'the First
Amendment is only an amendment'."
"He
[Cline] later became director of the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence
and Research (1969-73), where he helped coordinate the CIA's destabilization
and eventual overthrow of the Allende government in Chile."
But
again, no problem. Why would we even suspect Halper was engaged in anything
illegal during his time as a mole inside the Trump campaign?
The FBI
is pure as the driven snow. So is the CIA. All is well.
Could Christians Today Accidentally Take The Mark of the Beast?Les chrétiens d'aujourd'hui pourraient-ils accidentellement prendre la marque de la bête?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)