There are 78 days until the first blood moon of the
tetrad begins on 15 April 2014 or 15 Nisan 5774! Pastor Mark Biltz made this amazing discovery in
2008. Biltz had been studying prophecies that focus on the sun and moon. These prophecies are God’s signal to his Chosen people and Christians,
like 'one if by land, two if by sea.' "The Hebrew word implies it's a
signal for coming or His appearing." Indeed, Pastor Biltz is correct these
signals are divine appointments. A series of 4 blood moons is a warning to the
nation of Israel while the 2 solar eclipses are warning to the world. Friends, 78 days is very short.
 |
| The destruction in Homs, Syria as of 27 Jan 2014
Friends, as I have said before Damascus
and Syria are becoming a heap of ruins right before our eyes. Prepare for the
Psalm 83 War and the Rapture. Don’t tie your shoe strings too tight because I hear the
faint sound of the angel’s trumpet blowing. Below are the verses from Isaiah 17.
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold,
Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.
2 The cities of Aroer are forsaken:
they shall be for flocks, which shall lie down, and none shall make them
afraid.
3 The fortress also shall cease from
Ephraim, and the kingdom from Damascus, and the remnant of Syria: they shall be
as the glory of the children of Israel, saith the LORD of hosts.
4 And in that day it shall come to
pass, that the glory of Jacob shall be made thin, and the fatness of his flesh
shall wax lean.
5 And it shall be as when the
harvestman gathereth the corn, and reapeth the ears with his arm; and it shall
be as he that gathereth ears in the valley of Rephaim.
6 Yet gleaning grapes shall be left in
it, as the shaking of an olive tree, two or three berries in the top of the
uppermost bough, four or five in the outmost fruitful branches thereof, saith
the LORD God of Israel.
I think what most people are missing is
that the Illuminati, via people like Soros and the Rothschilds and their NGOs
are moving from country to country de-stabilizing or attempting to de-stabilize
them. Here is the partial list: Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Ukraine, Mali,
Central African Republic, Malaysia, Iraq, Iran, Greece, Portugal, Spain and
Turkey.
In reference to the article below, I do
not believe the treachery and treason in Washington D.C. will cease. The
Republican and Democratic parties are full of traitors and Illuminati. The U.S. government,
the Illuminati and its Muslim allies are funding the destruction and
de-stabilization of Syria by providing weapons and financing to al Qaeda, al
Nusra and their allies.
The weapons, most of which are moving
to Islamist Syrian rebels via Jordan, include a variety of small arms, as well
as some more powerful weapons, such as anti-tank rockets. The anti-tank
missiles are essential to defeat Assad’s army.
The weapons deliveries have been funded
by the U.S. Congress, in votes behind closed doors, through the end of government
fiscal year until September 2014.
The apparently steady weapons flow
contrasts with the situation last summer, when lethal U.S. aid to the Syrian
rebels dried up for a time due to congressional reservations.
Congressional committees held up
weapons deliveries for months over fears that U.S. arms would not prove
decisive in the rebels’ efforts to oust President Bashar Assad and his
government and could well end up in the hands of Islamist militants.
A U.S. official familiar with recent
developments said national security officials and members of Congress are more
confident that weapons delivered to southern Syria are going to, and
remaining in, the hands of moderate rebels rather than militant jihadist
factions. If you believe that I will sell a great bridge over the Ohio called
the Brent Spence.
Congress approved funding for weapons
deliveries to the Syrian rebels in classified sections of defense
appropriations legislation, two sources familiar with the matter said. It was
not clear when the funding was approved, but unclassified defense funding
passed Congress in late December.
Some additional budget tweaks may be
necessary to ensure that all the approved funding is fully available for
disbursement during the current fiscal year.
Yet, officials who support providing
U.S. arms to the rebels acknowledge that this has not greatly increased U.S.
expectations of victory by anti-Assad forces.
“The Syrian war is a stalemate. The
rebels lack the organization and weapons to defeat Assad; the regime lacks the
loyal manpower to suppress the rebellion. Both sides’ external allies… are
ready to supply enough money and arms to fuel the stalemate for the foreseeable
future,” said Bruce Riedel, a former senior CIA analyst and sometime foreign
policy adviser to President Barack Obama.
Both U.S. and European officials said
that “moderate” rebels had recently consolidated their positions in the Syrian
south, where they are pushing out elements linked to al-Qaeda. Friends, I
watched a video from Aleppo, Syria yesterday and the rebel factions are
fighting each other while Assad’s army watches. Most Syrians are innocent and
are caught up in this ferocious war being fought by foreigners. It is an understatement to say that the more
militant factions remain dominant in the north and east.
A recent favorable development is that
Kurdish groups that had been providing weapons and other aid financed by donors
in the Gulf state of Qatar have greatly reduced their involvement in the weapons
traffic, one of the officials said.
As for “non-lethal” aid like
communications and transportation equipment, the United States hopes to resume
deliveries to moderate groups in Syria soon, a U.S. official said on
Monday.
The United States and Britain allegedly
suspended non-lethal aid to northern Syria in December
after reports that Islamist fighters seized Western-backed rebel weapons
warehouses. Quite frankly supplies are ending up in hostile hands.
“We hope to be able to resume
assistance to the Supreme Military Council (SMC) shortly, pending security and
logistics considerations,” said the official, referring to the SMC as a
moderate rebel group. “But we have no announcements at this time,” he said,
speaking on condition of anonymity.
Non-lethal aid was resumed to civilian
groups in that region in late December.
Dr. Robin Colgrove said, clearly we’re seeing a lot more flu a lot earlier than we
usually do. A few other things are unusual this year.
1. Despite the vaccine.
It seems to us that we’re seeing more confirmed cases of
influenza, using the rapid antigen test, in people who have been vaccinated than
we would normally see. I was speaking about this at grand rounds the other day
and among the primary care doctors in the audience, a number were saying the
same thing.
Dr. Robin Colgrove
Those cases have been mostly mild cases and it may be they
have partial protection from the vaccine. (Flu vaccine efficacy has been
controversial among researchers for quite some time. In ideal conditions with
young healthy people, it may be 80-90 percent effective, but when
epidemiologists look at the real world, the numbers have been much lower, maybe
50-60 percent efficacy.) Even in the best years, some people who get vaccinated
also get influenza, but they are probably less likely to have severe and
prolonged illness.
2. Atypical symptoms
A related point: There seem to
be more people this year with atypical symptoms. Clinicians tend to be good at
identifying flu: an abrupt high fever and severe malaise, and upper and lower
respiratory symptoms. That pattern in the middle of a flu outbreak is almost
always flu. Now we’re seeing people [who test positive for flu] with no high
fever, maybe scratchy throats, possible gastro-intestinal symptoms.
It’s too early to know what this means, but it’s a real
problem for primary care doctors who would normally be able to say, ‘You don’t
have the flu.’ And it’s less of an issue for the patients themselves who are
not that sick, and can just go home, drink chicken soup and watch TV. What we
don’t know is the risk those people might pose to the traditionally vulnerable
populations. This person who has just a sniffle and thinks it’s a cold, if they
go and visit Grandma in the ICU, could they kill her?
3. Prolonged misery
And the third pattern I find I’m being asked about: People
who have what sounds like an initial bout of flu and then prolonged illness for
weeks. And that shouldn’t happen — there are only a very small number of
viruses and no respiratory viruses that go on for weeks.
Classically, we worry about bacterial pneumonia: You get the
flu, you’re getting better on days 6, 7 and 8, then get worse at days 8, 9 and
10. But with this new pattern, you get a febrile illness, your fever goes down
and then you continue to cough and feel lousy for weeks. We don’t know what
that is, but there’s more of that this year. One possibility is that though
there are, broadly speaking, no chronic respiratory infections of normal lungs,
you can have chronic infection in the sinuses; so some people may have had the
flu and developed smouldering sinus infections whose dripping also causes
coughing.
A final note about following flu statistic: One thing that is
known historically is that there is a real effect of rumors on epidemics; they can
make them worse. There’s abundant evidence that misinformation during the
Spanish flu caused a lot of problems. In the Internet era, this is a particular
problem, so I advise people to consult the CDC and the WHO, and more or less
ignore everyone else.
Readers, does this jibe with
your experience? I definitely have the sense that for many people, this will go
down as The Winter Of The Endless Cough…
“Adam,” our oldest relative to date, finally has a
date of birth, and it’s not 5,764 years ago, when the world was created
according to Ken Hamm of Answers in Genesis and the Bible. According to
two Israeli researchers,
the first human walked on earth 209,000 years
ago – 9,000 years earlier than what scientists previously thought.
The study was conducted by Dr. Eran Elhaik from the
University of Sheffield and by Professor Dan Grauer from the University of
Houston and the Tel Aviv University. Their findings contradict a previous study
that determined that the discovery of the Y chromosome (present only in men,
while women have two X chromosome) predated humanity.
The two concluded that the first “genetic Adam” is
now placed in his rightful place in evolutionary history.
Dr. Elhaik and Professor Grauer reported that they
used conventional biological models in their research, which was published in
the “European Journal of Human Genetics”. Notice carefully their research is
based on computer models that, in my opinion, can be faulty.
The two researchers dated the birth of the first
human with the help of genetic data that were already available. To calculate
the age of the Y chromosome, they multiplied the average age in which men have
their first child with the number of mutations they detected. They then divided
that number by Y chromosome’s mutation rate – or how many years in average it
takes for a mutation to appear.
Groups
of ‘Adams’ and ‘Eves’
The origin of Adam and Eve, and where they lived,
are details that are naturally still under dispute by researchers worldwide. In
a previous study conducted at the University of Arizona, it was argued that
Adam’s Y chromosome was in existence before Eve’s mitochondrial DNA. According
to the same study, the Y chromosome had already existed 338 thousand years ago,
long before the creation of mankind.
“Of course, we can manipulate each one of these
variables to make a finding look younger or older,” and “In our paper, we
showed the previous study manipulated all these variable to predate the Y
chromosome said Dr. Elhaik.
“We can say with some certainty that modern humans
emerged in Africa a little over 200,000 years
ago. It is obvious that modern humans did not interbreed with hominids living
over 500,000 years ago. It is also clear that there was no single ‘Adam’ and
‘Eve,’ but rather groups of ‘Adams’ and ‘Eves’ living side by side and
wandering together in our world.
“We have shown that the University of Arizona study
lacks any scientific merit. In fact, their hypothesis creates a sort of
‘space-time paradox’ whereby the most ancient individual belonging to Homo
sapiens species has not yet been born,” Dr. Elhaik added.
Back
to the Future – it’s the same idea
Drawing on a cinematic analogy, Dr. Elhaik
continued his explanation: “If we take the numerical results from previous
studies seriously we can conclude that the past may be altered by the mother of
‘Adam’ deciding not to conceive him in the future, thus, bringing a retroactive
end to our species.
“Think of the movie Back to the Future, when Marty
was worried that his parents would not meet and as a result he wouldn’t be born
– it’s the same idea.”
Another previous study, conducted at Stanford
University, determined that Adam and Eve lived during the same time in history, but dated their existence to a
different, later period. According to the same study, the first human lived
120,000 to 156,000 years ago, while Eve lived 99,000 to 148,000 years ago.
Obviously, as we can see, here are three groups of evolutionary, secular
scientists who can’t agree, so why should we swallow their findings. As for me
I think I will stick with the Intelligent Designer – God and His word the
Bible.
Why does the
Trinity Broadcasting Network continue eliminating end times ministers on their
network?
Founder of EndTime Ministries and host of End of the Age, Irvin Baxter is yet another minister in the growing list who has been silenced by the largest Christian network on TV. In his January 21st announcement, Baxter declared: "You probably have heard by now about the passing of Paul Crouch, founder and President of TBN. Paul believed strongly in EndTime Ministries and was a great friend of our program. With his departure, his wife Jan has assumed the management of TBN. I have never met Jan but apparently she does not have a strong interest in Bible prophecy. As a result, our program, as well as several other prophecy programs on TBN, has been discontinued. Wednesday, January 15th was our last time to air. I wanted you to know because many of you watch our program, “End of the Age”, on TBN. We can continue to be viewed on the Church Channel, which belongs to TBN, the Daystar Network, TCT and on other venues." EndTime Ministries  It began with Hal Lindsey in January of 2006, when the International Intelligence Briefing notified TBN that he would not return due to, what he considered to be, 'efforts to muzzle his opinions about radical Islam.' Lindsey, is a best-selling Christian end times author, who had anchored the program for 12 years on the world’s largest Christian network.  Then, in August of that same year, Zola Levitt Presents, a long-running, weekly TV program often critical of the jihadist principles within Islam, was also canceled by Trinity Broadcasting Network. TBN producers claimed it was due to their efforts to gratify its growing audience in the Arab world.  A few years later, in 2011, well known prophecy teacher, Jack Van Impe, was discharged over his criticism of Christian leaders Rick Warren of “The Purpose Driven Life” fame, and Robert Schuller from the now defunct Crystal Cathedral after they adopted a policy often referred to as "Chrislam" - which involves finding common ground between Islam and Christianity.  In most cases those efforts to “reach out” to Muslims involves incorporating the beliefs or practices of Islam into their Christian organizations. Several churches have allowed Muslim Imams to pray and preach from the pulpit to their congregations with Brian McLaren of the emerging church movement even taking part in the Islamic Ramadan celebration. When TBN refused to run a program where Van Impe highly criticized leaders like Rick Warren and Robert Schuller for their Chrislam efforts, he announced, “I Will Not Be Silenced! I will not allow anyone to tell me what I can and cannot preach.” He added, “When I see heretical teaching leading to apostasy, I will speak out. The Bible says ‘All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:’ (II Timothy 3:16). The Apostle Paul also gives instructions in Titus 1:9-11, 13 ‘Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers. For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers … Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake…Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith.’” Although Islam was not listed in the reasons given for Irvin Baxter's recent departure from TBN, it is noteworthy to mention that he too spoke out often against Islam in his programs.  Has TBN become fearful of end times prophecy teachings? Or, are they more concerned with political correctness, afraid they might offend Muslims and pro-Muslim/Chrislam advocates? 
C/Net News reported on
1/26/2014 that the National Security Agency (NSA) engages in industrial
espionage, grabbing intelligence from foreign companies regardless of the
information's value to national defense, Edward Snowden told a German TV
network ... “There is no question that the US is engaged in economic spying”,
Snowden said ... “If there's information at Siemens that's beneficial to U.S.
national interests -- even if it doesn't have anything to do with national
security -- then they'll take that information nevertheless."
When Edward Snowden bolted
from the NSA where he worked as an analyst, he carried with him tens of
thousands of classified documents which revealed that the NSA was
indiscriminately spying on governments and individuals alike. Some estimates
are that the NSA collects over 200 million phone calls a day, not to mention
other types of intelligence gathering.
This massive global effort to
capture communications from the important down to the mundane shocked the
American people greatly. All of America and the world were instantly divided
into two camps:
1) The ones cheering his
whistle blowing efforts in revealing that NSA was engaged in illegal and
probably unconstitutional snooping activities on law-abiding citizens;
2) Those who defended their
actions on the basis that we needed to give up some liberty in order to gain
some slight measure of security. These people obviously never heard Benjamin
Franklin warn that "those who would be willing to give up liberty for
security deserve neither liberty nor security".
Snowden revelations have been
manipulated so that citizens here and abroad will actually see their positions
change, toward the government position! How is this possible? Through the
formula called "The Six-Step
Attitudinal Change Plan: Insidious Technique To Change The Mindset of An Entire
Population, Invisibly, Silently".
Here is how it works:
Step 1. Some practice so
offensive that it can scarcely be discussed in public is advocated by a
RESPECTED expert in a respected forum.
Step 2. At first, the public
is shocked, then outraged.
Step 3. But, the very fact
that such a thing could be publicly debated becomes the subject
of the debate.
Step 4. In the process, sheer
repetition of the shocking subject under discussion gradually dulling its
effect.
Step 5. People then are no
longer shocked by the subject.
Step 6. No longer outraged,
people begin to argue for positions to moderate the extreme; or, they accept
the premise, challenging, instead, the means to achieve it.
This insidious method of
changing the deeply-held attitudes of people is being successfully directed
toward the American population as a whole. Millions of people are experiencing
attitudinal changes on a wide variety of subjects today. This attitudinal
change is essential to achieving the New World Order (NOW).
Once you understand this Mind
Control technique, you will find yourself far less vulnerable to it than
before. People need to read their news and listen to TV news with a mind fully
active in employing its protective sensors. No one can watch or read news with
a passive mind anymore.
Friends question everything
you see or read!
Russia Today reported on 1-26-14
that all blood relatives of North Korea’s number two leader (who was executed a
month ago) have apparently suffered the same fate. Once all powerful, Jang
Song-thaek was the regent while Kim was still too young to govern after Kim
Jong-ils death. Jang was executed on December 12, 2013 at the age of 67, after
making an alleged attempt to stage a military coup and dethrone his nephew. Kim
Jong-un ordered the total elimination of his uncles biological relatives to
demonstrate decisiveness and to clamp down on mutiny with an iron fist. Multiple'
sources in Pyongyang told the Seoul-based Yonhap news agency this information.
The new young North Korean dictator
murdered his uncle, his uncle's wife and all his biological relatives.
Kim Jong-un pictured above says "I will get you old farts for squeezing the hell out of my hands, I refuse to say uncle!"
This kind of bestial mindset is typical
of an absolute dictator who is either feeling threatened or who is trying to
firm up his position as the top tyrant of his country.
The North Korean dictator must have
a brutal Stalinist reputation and a total disdain for life if he is going
to successfully carry out his role of a communist leader. When you comprehend Godless communism then
you understand why Kim is unnaturally brutal. Kim Jong-un must have that
reputation if he is to be believed on the world stage. Otherwise his threats to
Japan and America will be hollow.
|
New York City
Mayor Bill de Blasio gave an unannounced speech to AIPAC representatives on the
23rd of January at Manhattan’s Hilton Hotel. The event was closed to the press,
though a Capital New York reporter managed to record the mayor’s speech before
being escorted out of the room by security. And just like that, a
fairly routine speech has taken on a slightly scandalous air. All because the
group’s insistence on exclusivity and closed meetings made this speech seem
just a little bit, well, secretive.
Contrary to
what it might seem like, de Blasio didn’t actually say anything new, or even
particularly interesting. “There is a philosophical grounding to my belief in
Israel and it is my belief, it is our obligation, to defend Israel, but it is
also something that is elemental to being an American because there is no
greater ally on earth, and that’s something we can say proudly,” de Blasio told the crowd,
according to Capital. It was hardly Mitt Romney’s 47 percent gaffe.
He’s said most of this stuff before, and in public. His pro-Israel stance is
hardly a secret. In fact it’s not a secret at all.
Today de Blasio
was questioned by reporters about his purported commitment to transparency.
“Now, the truth is that the event sponsors, whatever the event is, have a right
to set the ground rules,” de Blasio told Politicker.
“And AIPAC believed–not because of me, but because of all the people speaking
there–that they wanted to have the event they wanted to have the way they
wanted to have it and it was a closed-press event. There are many events in
this town that are closed-press events.”
Why AIPAC felt the need to keep an
event featuring the brand new mayor of New York City closed to press is the
nagging question, especially given that de Blasio’s views on Israel are of
legitimate interest to a large portion of the population he now represents.
Didn’t they expect that some people outside the room might be curious and that
the private nature of the meeting might rub others the wrong way? It seems like
we’d all be reporting on a fairly uneventful speech had we only been allowed
inside the room. We might not even be talking about it at all today.
On January 15,
2014 Obama has officially announced plans to trash the Constitution and move
forward with asocialist-corporatist
dictatorship without input from Congress or the American people. He made the announcement
Tuesday during a cabinet meeting. “We’re not just
going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re
providing
Americans the kind of help they need. I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone,” Obama said.
“And I can use
that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative
actions that move the ball forward in helping to make sure our kids are getting the best
education possible, making sure that our businesses are getting the kind of support and help
they need to grow and advance, to make sure that people are getting the skills that they need to
get those jobs that our businesses are creating.”
Article I Section
I of the Constitution clearly states all legislative powers reside with Congress. The
founders were inspired by the writings of Montesquieu and insisted on three separate
branches of government and instituted a system of checks and balances to prevent
tyranny. “There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers
are united in the
same person,” Montesquieu wrote.
James Madison,
writing in Federalist 46, warned that consolidated power at the executive level is the very
definition of tyranny. “The accumulation of all power, legislative, executive, and
judiciary in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of
tyranny.”
George Washington
signed the first executive order proclaiming a national day of thanksgiving in 1789. Since
that time, the Supreme Court has ruled executive orders may not be used to make law, only
execute laws passed by Congress. From Woodrow Wilson and Franklin
Roosevelt onward,
however, presidents have signed a large number of increasingly audacious and
unconstitutional executive orders.
“Obama, lacking
the charm of Franklin Roosevelt, nevertheless seeks to follow his path in growing executive
power,” writes David Davenport. “Starting with President Woodrow Wilson, and
culminating in Roosevelt’s New Deal, progressives sought to undermine the power of the
legislature in favor of consolidating power in the executive branch. From passing the
sweeping healthcare reform bill on a party-line vote, to the largest use of
executive czars in our
history, to initiating new policies on things like immigration and gun control
by executive order,
Obama seeks to leave 225 years of constitutional separation of powers behind.
This needs to be
exposed for what it is: a series of constitutional end-runs and a power grab by a frustrated and
legacy-driven president.”
William L.
Anderson said: “Unless members of the other branches are willing to act on the important
principle of decentralization of power, the American Experiment will end up being nothing but
a footnote of history.” This relegation
of the American experiment to an irrelevant footnote is
precisely what the global elite with a stranglehold on government have in mind.
The globalist
intelligentsia continues to argue in favor of trashing the Constitution. In 2011, CNN
contributor Fareed Zakaria argued that the Constitution is outdated and its principles should
be “debated and fixed” to conform with the modern era. He suggested “a set of
amendments to modernize the Constitution for the 21st Century.” Adherence to the
Constitution is now portrayed as a form of mental illness. “Indeed, there is something
infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshipers that the complex
political arguments of
today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th
century,” the editors the
Economist wrote in late 2010.
The Constitution
stands between the global elite and their plan to reduce America to an economic and
cultural ruin. Natural rights and individual sovereignty are obstacles and they must be
destroyed if a one world totalitarian government is to be realized. Obama’s
latest comments on the
plan to impose executive decrees – as usual, for the sake of the children –
sets the stage for the
next phase of dictatorial government and the dismantlement of the Constitution
and its relegation to
the dustbin of history.
Part of the UN’s
Agenda 21 includes the abolition of private property. Confiscation of
private property
will be done under the guise of “sustainability.” Agenda 21 advocates argue
that owning a large
plot of land is an inefficient use of the land, and that land would be better
used if it were
developed into something else. Perhaps
they’d prefer that a mass transit rail
run right through
your property. So your property will be seized through eminent domain, forcing
you out of your house
and off your property. Don’t worry though you will find an apartment or condo
in dense housing,
generally a high rise. Your land will be used as the Agenda 21 Nazis see fit. These
types of
tyrannical gestures are being implemented around our country at the local
level.
In California,
there is a law that’s awaiting Governor Brown’s signature that would institute
an agency
at the county
level that could seize private property on a whim and using “sustainability” will
be used
as the excuse. Richard
Hall of the San Rafael Patch summed up SB 1:
1. A city mayor
or county can form a new joint powers authority called a
“Sustainable Communities
Investment Authority” (SCIA). SCIA can appoint elected officials to
serve on the
SCIAs board.
2. If a person
lives within 1/2 mile of a bus that runs every 15 minutes during peak commutes,
or
the SMART train
or Caltrain in a single family home neighborhood your neighborhood
can be targeted
by the SCIA as inefficient land use as long as it is not “blighted” and is not a
high
density
multi-family housing. Almost everyone in Marin, CA. is therefore
affected. The map
with these 1/2 mile radiuses covers almost all Marinites.
3. The SCIA can
then wield the power of eminent domain to purchase unused, for sale or even occupied
land in order to build high-density multi-family housing. It can be any land that
SCIA deems is not
efficient land use.
4. The SCIA can
then impose local taxes to pay not just for the eminent domain purchases but to
help the land developer build by subsidizing the building of highdensity housing.
No comments:
Post a Comment