Tuesday, January 28, 2014

"End Times News" and Gospel Message 28 January 2014 Watchman report 14-36


There are 78 days until the first blood moon of the tetrad begins on 15 April 2014 or 15 Nisan 5774! Pastor Mark Biltz made this amazing discovery in 2008. Biltz had been studying prophecies that focus on the sun and moon. These prophecies are God’s signal to his Chosen people and Christians, like 'one if by land, two if by sea.' "The Hebrew word implies it's a signal for coming or His appearing." Indeed, Pastor Biltz is correct these signals are divine appointments. A series of 4 blood moons is a warning to the nation of Israel while the 2 solar eclipses are warning to the world. Friends, 78 days is very short.


syria war damage
The destruction in Homs, Syria as of 27 Jan 2014

Friends, as I have said before Damascus and Syria are becoming a heap of ruins right before our eyes. Prepare for the Psalm 83 War and the Rapture. Don’t tie your shoe strings too tight because I hear the faint sound of the angel’s trumpet blowing. Below are the verses from Isaiah 17.
    
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.
2 The cities of Aroer are forsaken: they shall be for flocks, which shall lie down, and none shall make them afraid.
3 The fortress also shall cease from Ephraim, and the kingdom from Damascus, and the remnant of Syria: they shall be as the glory of the children of Israel, saith the LORD of hosts.
4 And in that day it shall come to pass, that the glory of Jacob shall be made thin, and the fatness of his flesh shall wax lean.
5 And it shall be as when the harvestman gathereth the corn, and reapeth the ears with his arm; and it shall be as he that gathereth ears in the valley of Rephaim.
6 Yet gleaning grapes shall be left in it, as the shaking of an olive tree, two or three berries in the top of the uppermost bough, four or five in the outmost fruitful branches thereof, saith the LORD God of Israel.
I think what most people are missing is that the Illuminati, via people like Soros and the Rothschilds and their NGOs are moving from country to country de-stabilizing or attempting to de-stabilize them. Here is the partial list: Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Ukraine, Mali, Central African Republic, Malaysia, Iraq, Iran, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Turkey.
In reference to the article below, I do not believe the treachery and treason in Washington D.C. will cease. The Republican and Democratic parties are full of traitors and Illuminati. The U.S. government, the Illuminati and its Muslim allies are funding the destruction and de-stabilization of Syria by providing weapons and financing to al Qaeda, al Nusra and their allies.
The weapons, most of which are moving to Islamist Syrian rebels via Jordan, include a variety of small arms, as well as some more powerful weapons, such as anti-tank rockets. The anti-tank missiles are essential to defeat Assad’s army.
The weapons deliveries have been funded by the U.S. Congress, in votes behind closed doors, through the end of government fiscal year until September 2014.
The apparently steady weapons flow contrasts with the situation last summer, when lethal U.S. aid to the Syrian rebels dried up for a time due to congressional reservations.
Congressional committees held up weapons deliveries for months over fears that U.S. arms would not prove decisive in the rebels’ efforts to oust President Bashar Assad and his government and could well end up in the hands of Islamist militants.
A U.S. official familiar with recent developments said national security officials and members of Congress are more confident that weapons delivered to southern Syria are going to, and remaining in, the hands of moderate rebels rather than militant jihadist factions. If you believe that I will sell a great bridge over the Ohio called the Brent Spence.
Congress approved funding for weapons deliveries to the Syrian rebels in classified sections of defense appropriations legislation, two sources familiar with the matter said. It was not clear when the funding was approved, but unclassified defense funding passed Congress in late December.
Some additional budget tweaks may be necessary to ensure that all the approved funding is fully available for disbursement during the current fiscal year.
Yet, officials who support providing U.S. arms to the rebels acknowledge that this has not greatly increased U.S. expectations of victory by anti-Assad forces.
“The Syrian war is a stalemate. The rebels lack the organization and weapons to defeat Assad; the regime lacks the loyal manpower to suppress the rebellion. Both sides’ external allies… are ready to supply enough money and arms to fuel the stalemate for the foreseeable future,” said Bruce Riedel, a former senior CIA analyst and sometime foreign policy adviser to President Barack Obama.
Both U.S. and European officials said that “moderate” rebels had recently consolidated their positions in the Syrian south, where they are pushing out elements linked to al-Qaeda. Friends, I watched a video from Aleppo, Syria yesterday and the rebel factions are fighting each other while Assad’s army watches. Most Syrians are innocent and are caught up in this ferocious war being fought by foreigners.  It is an understatement to say that the more militant factions remain dominant in the north and east.
A recent favorable development is that Kurdish groups that had been providing weapons and other aid financed by donors in the Gulf state of Qatar have greatly reduced their involvement in the weapons traffic, one of the officials said.
As for “non-lethal” aid like communications and transportation equipment, the United States hopes to resume deliveries to moderate groups in Syria soon, a U.S. official said on Monday.
The United States and Britain allegedly suspended non-lethal aid to northern Syria in December after reports that Islamist fighters seized Western-backed rebel weapons warehouses. Quite frankly supplies are ending up in hostile hands.
“We hope to be able to resume assistance to the Supreme Military Council (SMC) shortly, pending security and logistics considerations,” said the official, referring to the SMC as a moderate rebel group. “But we have no announcements at this time,” he said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Non-lethal aid was resumed to civilian groups in that region in late December.
cdcflu0107
Dr. Robin Colgrove said, clearly we’re seeing a lot more flu a lot earlier than we usually do. A few other things are unusual this year.
1. Despite the vaccine. 
It seems to us that we’re seeing more confirmed cases of influenza, using the rapid antigen test, in people who have been vaccinated than we would normally see. I was speaking about this at grand rounds the other day and among the primary care doctors in the audience, a number were saying the same thing.
Dr. Robin Colgrove
 Dr. Robin Colgrove

Those cases have been mostly mild cases and it may be they have partial protection from the vaccine. (Flu vaccine efficacy has been controversial among researchers for quite some time. In ideal conditions with young healthy people, it may be 80-90 percent effective, but when epidemiologists look at the real world, the numbers have been much lower, maybe 50-60 percent efficacy.) Even in the best years, some people who get vaccinated also get influenza, but they are probably less likely to have severe and prolonged illness.
2. Atypical symptoms
A related point: There seem to be more people this year with atypical symptoms. Clinicians tend to be good at identifying flu: an abrupt high fever and severe malaise, and upper and lower respiratory symptoms. That pattern in the middle of a flu outbreak is almost always flu. Now we’re seeing people [who test positive for flu] with no high fever, maybe scratchy throats, possible gastro-intestinal symptoms.
It’s too early to know what this means, but it’s a real problem for primary care doctors who would normally be able to say, ‘You don’t have the flu.’ And it’s less of an issue for the patients themselves who are not that sick, and can just go home, drink chicken soup and watch TV. What we don’t know is the risk those people might pose to the traditionally vulnerable populations. This person who has just a sniffle and thinks it’s a cold, if they go and visit Grandma in the ICU, could they kill her?
3. Prolonged misery
And the third pattern I find I’m being asked about: People who have what sounds like an initial bout of flu and then prolonged illness for weeks. And that shouldn’t happen — there are only a very small number of viruses and no respiratory viruses that go on for weeks.
Classically, we worry about bacterial pneumonia: You get the flu, you’re getting better on days 6, 7 and 8, then get worse at days 8, 9 and 10. But with this new pattern, you get a febrile illness, your fever goes down and then you continue to cough and feel lousy for weeks. We don’t know what that is, but there’s more of that this year. One possibility is that though there are, broadly speaking, no chronic respiratory infections of normal lungs, you can have chronic infection in the sinuses; so some people may have had the flu and developed smouldering sinus infections whose dripping also causes coughing.
A final note about following flu statistic: One thing that is known historically is that there is a real effect of rumors on epidemics; they can make them worse. There’s abundant evidence that misinformation during the Spanish flu caused a lot of problems. In the Internet era, this is a particular problem, so I advise people to consult the CDC and the WHO, and more or less ignore everyone else.
Readers, does this jibe with your experience? I definitely have the sense that for many people, this will go down as The Winter Of The Endless Cough…

“Adam,” our oldest relative to date, finally has a date of birth, and it’s not 5,764 years ago, when the world was created according to Ken Hamm of Answers in Genesis and the Bible. According to two Israeli researchers, the first human walked on earth 209,000 years ago – 9,000 years earlier than what scientists previously thought.
The study was conducted by Dr. Eran Elhaik from the University of Sheffield and by Professor Dan Grauer from the University of Houston and the Tel Aviv University. Their findings contradict a previous study that determined that the discovery of the Y chromosome (present only in men, while women have two X chromosome) predated humanity.
The two concluded that the first “genetic Adam” is now placed in his rightful place in evolutionary history.
Dr. Elhaik and Professor Grauer reported that they used conventional biological models in their research, which was published in the “European Journal of Human Genetics”. Notice carefully their research is based on computer models that, in my opinion, can be faulty.
The two researchers dated the birth of the first human with the help of genetic data that were already available. To calculate the age of the Y chromosome, they multiplied the average age in which men have their first child with the number of mutations they detected. They then divided that number by Y chromosome’s mutation rate – or how many years in average it takes for a mutation to appear.

Groups of ‘Adams’ and ‘Eves’

The origin of Adam and Eve, and where they lived, are details that are naturally still under dispute by researchers worldwide. In a previous study conducted at the University of Arizona, it was argued that Adam’s Y chromosome was in existence before Eve’s mitochondrial DNA. According to the same study, the Y chromosome had already existed 338 thousand years ago, long before the creation of mankind.
“Of course, we can manipulate each one of these variables to make a finding look younger or older,” and “In our paper, we showed the previous study manipulated all these variable to predate the Y chromosome said Dr. Elhaik.
“We can say with some certainty that modern humans emerged in Africa a little over 200,000 years ago. It is obvious that modern humans did not interbreed with hominids living over 500,000 years ago. It is also clear that there was no single ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve,’ but rather groups of ‘Adams’ and ‘Eves’ living side by side and wandering together in our world.
“We have shown that the University of Arizona study lacks any scientific merit. In fact, their hypothesis creates a sort of ‘space-time paradox’ whereby the most ancient individual belonging to Homo sapiens species has not yet been born,” Dr. Elhaik added.

Back to the Future – it’s the same idea

Drawing on a cinematic analogy, Dr. Elhaik continued his explanation: “If we take the numerical results from previous studies seriously we can conclude that the past may be altered by the mother of ‘Adam’ deciding not to conceive him in the future, thus, bringing a retroactive end to our species.
“Think of the movie Back to the Future, when Marty was worried that his parents would not meet and as a result he wouldn’t be born – it’s the same idea.”
Another previous study, conducted at Stanford University, determined that Adam and Eve lived during the same time in history, but dated their existence to a different, later period. According to the same study, the first human lived 120,000 to 156,000 years ago, while Eve lived 99,000 to 148,000 years ago. Obviously, as we can see, here are three groups of evolutionary, secular scientists who can’t agree, so why should we swallow their findings. As for me I think I will stick with the Intelligent Designer – God and His word the Bible.  
Why does the Trinity Broadcasting Network continue eliminating end times ministers on their network?

Founder of EndTime Ministries and host of End of the Age, Irvin Baxter is yet another minister in the growing list who has been silenced by the largest Christian network on TV. 

In his January 21st announcement, Baxter declared: "You probably have heard by now about the passing of Paul Crouch, founder and President of TBN. Paul believed strongly in EndTime Ministries and was a great friend of our program. With his departure, his wife Jan has assumed the management of TBN. I have never met Jan but apparently she does not have a strong interest in Bible prophecy. As a result, our program, as well as several other prophecy programs on TBN, has been discontinued. Wednesday, January 15th was our last time to air. I wanted you to know because many of you watch our program, “End of the Age”, on TBN. We can continue to be viewed on the Church Channel, which belongs to TBN, the Daystar Network, TCT and on other venues." EndTime Ministries

It began with Hal Lindsey in January of 2006, when the International Intelligence Briefing notified TBN that he would not return due to, what he considered to be, 'efforts to muzzle his opinions about radical Islam.' Lindsey, is a best-selling Christian end times author, who had anchored the program for 12 years on the world’s largest Christian network.


Then, in August of that same year, Zola Levitt Presents, a long-running, weekly TV program often critical of the jihadist principles within Islam, was also canceled by Trinity Broadcasting Network. TBN producers claimed it was due to their efforts to gratify its growing audience in the Arab world.

A few years later, in 2011, well known prophecy teacher, Jack Van Impe, was discharged over his criticism of Christian leaders Rick Warren of “The Purpose Driven Life” fame, and Robert Schuller from the now defunct Crystal Cathedral after they adopted a policy often referred to as "Chrislam" - which involves finding common ground between Islam and Christianity. 

In most cases those efforts to “reach out” to Muslims involves incorporating the beliefs or practices of Islam into their Christian organizations. Several churches have allowed Muslim Imams to pray and preach from the pulpit to their congregations with Brian McLaren of the emerging church movement even taking part in the Islamic Ramadan celebration.

When TBN refused to run a program where Van Impe highly criticized leaders like Rick Warren and Robert Schuller for their Chrislam efforts, he announced, “I Will Not Be Silenced! I will not allow anyone to tell me what I can and cannot preach.” 

He added, “When I see heretical teaching leading to apostasy, I will speak out. The Bible says ‘All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:’ (II Timothy 3:16). 

The Apostle Paul also gives instructions in Titus 1:9-11, 13 ‘Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers. For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers … Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake…Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith.’”

Although Islam was not listed in the reasons given for Irvin Baxter's recent departure from TBN, it is noteworthy to mention that he too spoke out often against Islam in his programs.


Has TBN become fearful of end times prophecy teachings? Or, are they more concerned with political correctness, afraid they might offend Muslims and pro-Muslim/Chrislam advocates?

C/Net News reported on 1/26/2014 that the National Security Agency (NSA) engages in industrial espionage, grabbing intelligence from foreign companies regardless of the information's value to national defense, Edward Snowden told a German TV network ... “There is no question that the US is engaged in economic spying”, Snowden said ... “If there's information at Siemens that's beneficial to U.S. national interests -- even if it doesn't have anything to do with national security -- then they'll take that information nevertheless."
When Edward Snowden bolted from the NSA where he worked as an analyst, he carried with him tens of thousands of classified documents which revealed that the NSA was indiscriminately spying on governments and individuals alike. Some estimates are that the NSA collects over 200 million phone calls a day, not to mention other types of intelligence gathering.
This massive global effort to capture communications from the important down to the mundane shocked the American people greatly. All of America and the world were instantly divided into two camps:
1) The ones cheering his whistle blowing efforts in revealing that NSA was engaged in illegal and probably unconstitutional snooping activities on law-abiding citizens;
2) Those who defended their actions on the basis that we needed to give up some liberty in order to gain some slight measure of security. These people obviously never heard Benjamin Franklin warn that "those who would be willing to give up liberty for security deserve neither liberty nor security".
Snowden revelations have been manipulated so that citizens here and abroad will actually see their positions change, toward the government position! How is this possible? Through the formula called "The Six-Step Attitudinal Change Plan: Insidious Technique To Change The Mindset of An Entire Population, Invisibly, Silently".
Here is how it works:
Step 1. Some practice so offensive that it can scarcely be discussed in public is advocated by a RESPECTED expert in a respected forum.
Step 2. At first, the public is shocked, then outraged.
Step 3. But, the very fact that such a thing could be publicly debated becomes the subject
of the debate.
Step 4. In the process, sheer repetition of the shocking subject under discussion gradually dulling its effect.
Step 5. People then are no longer shocked by the subject.
Step 6. No longer outraged, people begin to argue for positions to moderate the extreme; or, they accept the premise, challenging, instead, the means to achieve it.

This insidious method of changing the deeply-held attitudes of people is being successfully directed toward the American population as a whole. Millions of people are experiencing attitudinal changes on a wide variety of subjects today. This attitudinal change is essential to achieving the New World Order (NOW).
Once you understand this Mind Control technique, you will find yourself far less vulnerable to it than before. People need to read their news and listen to TV news with a mind fully active in employing its protective sensors. No one can watch or read news with a passive mind anymore.
Friends question everything you see or read!
Russia Today reported on 1-26-14 that all blood relatives of North Korea’s number two leader (who was executed a month ago) have apparently suffered the same fate. Once all powerful, Jang Song-thaek was the regent while Kim was still too young to govern after Kim Jong-ils death. Jang was executed on December 12, 2013 at the age of 67, after making an alleged attempt to stage a military coup and dethrone his nephew. Kim Jong-un ordered the total elimination of his uncles biological relatives to demonstrate decisiveness and to clamp down on mutiny with an iron fist. Multiple' sources in Pyongyang told the Seoul-based Yonhap news agency this information.
The new young North Korean dictator murdered his uncle, his uncle's wife and all his biological relatives.

Kim Jong-un pictured above says "I will get you old farts for squeezing the hell out of my hands, I refuse to say uncle!"
This kind of bestial mindset is typical of an absolute dictator who is either feeling threatened or who is trying to firm up his position as the top tyrant of his country.
The North Korean dictator must have a brutal Stalinist reputation and a total disdain for life if he is going to successfully carry out his role of a communist leader.  When you comprehend Godless communism then you understand why Kim is unnaturally brutal. Kim Jong-un must have that reputation if he is to be believed on the world stage. Otherwise his threats to Japan and America will be hollow.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio gave an unannounced speech to AIPAC representatives on the 23rd of January at Manhattan’s Hilton Hotel. The event was closed to the press, though a Capital New York reporter managed to record the mayor’s speech before being escorted out of the room by security. And just like that, a fairly routine speech has taken on a slightly scandalous air. All because the group’s insistence on exclusivity and closed meetings made this speech seem just a little bit, well, secretive.
Contrary to what it might seem like, de Blasio didn’t actually say anything new, or even particularly interesting. “There is a philosophical grounding to my belief in Israel and it is my belief, it is our obligation, to defend Israel, but it is also something that is elemental to being an American because there is no greater ally on earth, and that’s something we can say proudly,” de Blasio told the crowd, according to Capital. It was hardly Mitt Romney’s 47 percent gaffe. He’s said most of this stuff before, and in public. His pro-Israel stance is hardly a secret. In fact it’s not a secret at all.
Today de Blasio was questioned by reporters about his purported commitment to transparency. “Now, the truth is that the event sponsors, whatever the event is, have a right to set the ground rules,” de Blasio told Politicker. “And AIPAC believed–not because of me, but because of all the people speaking there–that they wanted to have the event they wanted to have the way they wanted to have it and it was a closed-press event. There are many events in this town that are closed-press events.”
Why AIPAC felt the need to keep an event featuring the brand new mayor of New York City closed to press is the nagging question, especially given that de Blasio’s views on Israel are of legitimate interest to a large portion of the population he now represents. Didn’t they expect that some people outside the room might be curious and that the private nature of the meeting might rub others the wrong way? It seems like we’d all be reporting on a fairly uneventful speech had we only been allowed inside the room. We might not even be talking about it at all today.



On January 15, 2014 Obama has officially announced plans to trash the Constitution and move forward with asocialist-corporatist dictatorship without input from Congress or the American people. He made the announcement Tuesday during a cabinet meeting. “We’re not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re
providing Americans the kind of help they need. I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone,” Obama said.

“And I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward in helping to make sure our kids are getting the best education possible, making sure that our businesses are getting the kind of support and help they need to grow and advance, to make sure that people are getting the skills that they need to get those jobs that our businesses are creating.”
Article I Section I of the Constitution clearly states all legislative powers reside with Congress. The founders were inspired by the writings of Montesquieu and insisted on three separate branches of government and instituted a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny. “There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person,” Montesquieu wrote.

James Madison, writing in Federalist 46, warned that consolidated power at the executive level is the very definition of tyranny. “The accumulation of all power, legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”

George Washington signed the first executive order proclaiming a national day of thanksgiving in 1789. Since that time, the Supreme Court has ruled executive orders may not be used to make law, only execute laws passed by Congress. From Woodrow Wilson and Franklin
Roosevelt onward, however, presidents have signed a large number of increasingly audacious and unconstitutional executive orders.
“Obama, lacking the charm of Franklin Roosevelt, nevertheless seeks to follow his path in growing executive power,” writes David Davenport. “Starting with President Woodrow Wilson, and culminating in Roosevelt’s New Deal, progressives sought to undermine the power of the legislature in favor of consolidating power in the executive branch. From passing the sweeping healthcare reform bill on a party-line vote, to the largest use of executive czars in our history, to initiating new policies on things like immigration and gun control by executive order, Obama seeks to leave 225 years of constitutional separation of powers behind.

This needs to be exposed for what it is: a series of constitutional end-runs and a power grab by a frustrated and legacy-driven president.” 
William L. Anderson said: “Unless members of the other branches are willing to act on the important principle of decentralization of power, the American Experiment will end up being nothing but a footnote of history.”  This relegation of the American experiment to an irrelevant footnote is precisely what the global elite with a stranglehold on government have in mind.

The globalist intelligentsia continues to argue in favor of trashing the Constitution. In 2011, CNN contributor Fareed Zakaria argued that the Constitution is outdated and its principles should be “debated and fixed” to conform with the modern era. He suggested “a set of amendments to modernize the Constitution for the 21st Century.” Adherence to the Constitution is now portrayed as a form of mental illness. “Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshipers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century,” the editors the Economist wrote in late 2010.

The Constitution stands between the global elite and their plan to reduce America to an economic and cultural ruin. Natural rights and individual sovereignty are obstacles and they must be destroyed if a one world totalitarian government is to be realized. Obama’s latest comments on the plan to impose executive decrees – as usual, for the sake of the children – sets the stage for the next phase of dictatorial government and the dismantlement of the Constitution and its relegation to the dustbin of history. 
 
Part of the UN’s Agenda 21 includes the abolition of private property. Confiscation of
private property will be done under the guise of “sustainability.” Agenda 21 advocates argue
that owning a large plot of land is an inefficient use of the land, and that land would be better
used if it were developed into something else.  Perhaps they’d prefer that a mass transit rail
run right through your property. So your property will be seized through eminent domain, forcing
you out of your house and off your property. Don’t worry though you will find an apartment or condo
in dense housing, generally a high rise. Your land will be used as the Agenda 21 Nazis see fit. These
types of tyrannical gestures are being implemented around our country at the local level.

In California, there is a law that’s awaiting Governor Brown’s signature that would institute an agency
at the county level that could seize private property on a whim and using “sustainability” will be used
as the excuse. Richard Hall of the San Rafael Patch summed up SB 1:
1. A city mayor or county can form a new joint powers authority called a
“Sustainable Communities Investment Authority” (SCIA). SCIA can appoint elected officials to
serve on the SCIAs board.
2. If a person lives within 1/2 mile of a bus that runs every 15 minutes during peak commutes, or
the SMART train or Caltrain in a single family home neighborhood your neighborhood
can be targeted by the SCIA as inefficient land use as long as it is not “blighted” and is not a high
density multi-family housing. Almost everyone in Marin, CA. is therefore
affected. The map with these 1/2 mile radiuses covers almost all Marinites.
3. The SCIA can then wield the power of eminent domain to purchase unused, for sale or even occupied land in order to build high-density multi-family housing. It can be any land that SCIA deems is not efficient land use.
4. The SCIA can then impose local taxes to pay not just for the eminent domain purchases but to help the land developer build by subsidizing the building of highdensity housing.



No comments:

Post a Comment