by Barry Chamish
American, Israeli And Jordanian Troops And
CIA Agents Have Entered Syria, Le Figaro Reports
We have yet to see secondary confirmation of the following
breaking news from the second largest French newspaper, Le Figaro, but if
accurate, it means the Nobel Peace Prize winning president has just engaged in
yet another unsanctioned by Congress war.
From Le Figaro:
According to our information, the regime's opponents, supervised
by Jordanian, Israeli and American commandos moving towards Damascus since
mid-August. This attack could explain the possible use of the Syrian
president to chemical weapons.
According to information obtained by Le Figaro , the first
trained in guerrilla warfare by the Americans in Jordan Syrian troops
reportedly entered into action since mid-August in southern Syria, in the
region of Deraa. A first group of 300 men, probably supported by Israeli and
Jordanian commandos, as well as men of the CIA, had crossed the border on
August 17. A second would have joined the 19. According to military
sources, the Americans, who do not want to put troops on the Syrian soil are
arming rebels in part controlled by radical Islamists, quietly for several
months in a training camp set up at the Jordanian border- Syrian fighters FSA,
the Free Syrian Army are handpicked.
According to this expert on
the region, the idea proposed by Washington would be the possible establishment
of a buffer zone from the south of Syria, or even a no-fly zone, which would
cause opponents safely until the balance of power changes. This is the reason
why the United States has deployed Patriot batteries and F16 in late June
in Jordan.
Translated. Forget Israeli and Jordanian commandos working
together. This was an American operation. On the 17th and 19th of August some
600 American trained and armed commandos entered Syria and and on August 21,
they shot missiles with nerve gas heads on 11 rebel sites. This gave Obama
the pretext to demand the bombing of Syria to "teach Assad a lesson."
What the real objective was the annihilation of Israel.
This ghastly motive is shockingly revealed in a Wikileak:
INSIGHT - military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal status
of forces
Released on 2012-03-06 07:00 GMT
A few points I wanted to highlight from meetings today --
I spent most of the afternoon at the Pentagon with the USAF
strategic studies group - guys who spend their time trying to understand and
explain to the USAF chief the big picture in areas where they're operating in.
It was just myself and four other guys at the Lieutenant Colonel level,
including one French and one British representative who are liaising with the
US currently out of DC.
I kept pressing on the question of what these SOF teams would be
working toward, and whether this would lead to an eventual air camapign to give
a Syrian rebel group cover. They pretty quickly distanced
themselves from that idea, saying that the idea 'hypothetically' is to
commit guerrilla attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the
Alawite forces, elicit collapse from within. There wouldn't be a need
for air cover, and they wouldn't expect these Syrian rebels to be marching in
columns anyway.
They emphasized how the air campaign in Syria makes Libya look
like a piece of cake. Syrian air defenses are a lot more robust and are
much denser, esp around Damascus and on the borders with Israel, Turkey. They
are most worried about mobile air defenses, particularly the SA-17s that
they've been getting recently. It's still a doable mission, it's just not an
easy one.
The main base they would use is Cyprus, hands down. Brits and
French would fly out of there. They kept stressing how much is
stored at Cyprus and how much recce comes out of there. The group was split on
whether Turkey would be involved, but said Turkey would be pretty critical to
the mission to base stuff out of there. Even if Turkey had a poltiical
problem with Cyprus, they said there is no way the Brits and the French
wouldn't use Cyprus as their main air force base. Air Force Intel guy
seems pretty convinced that the Turks won't participate(he
seemed pretty pissed at them.)
There still seems to be a lot of confusion over what a military
intervention involving an air campaign would be designed to achieve. It
isn't clear cut for them geographically like in Libya, and you can't just
create an NFZ over Homs, Hama region. This would entail a countrywide
SEAD campaign lasting the duration of the war. They dont' believe
air intervention would happen unless there was enough media attention on a
massacre, like the Ghadafi move against Benghazi. They think the
US would have a high tolerance for killings as long as it doesn't reach that
very public stage. Theyre also questiioning the skills of the Syrian
forces that are operating the country's air defenses currently and how
signfiicant the Iranian presence is there. Air Force Intel guy is most obsessed
with the challenge of taking out Syria's ballistic missile capabilities and
chem weapons. With Israel right there and the regime facing an existential
crisis, he sees that as a major complication to any military intervention.
Needless to say,
mainstream sources as widely divergent as The New Yorker, Stratcor and
Washington Post have all confirmed the American presence in Jordan, since at
least June, and by all standards they agree this is an
illegal pot-stirring operation. And Syria has been upfront what its
reaction to an attack by B-2s, B-52s and Navy Tomahawk missiles would be:
 |
| Radiation levels at Fukushima Daichi |
Judge Andrew Napolitano, the author of “Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American
Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom,” joined Glenn Beck on The Glenn Beck Program Wednesday
to discuss the legal issues surrounding the conflict in Syria, the NSA spying
scandal, and libertarianism.
Beck
began by playing “devil’s advocate” on Syria, asking solemnly, “what about the
children?”
“The
lynchpin for American involvement in a foreign war is not revulsion at what’s
happening,” Napolitano replied firmly. “The lynchpin for American
involvement in a foreign war is, will our freedom and security be affected if
we don’t get involved? Answer: no. How could we possibly be
affected by a war 6,700 miles from here?”
Napolitano
proceeded to lay out four circumstances under which the American military can
legally get involved in a foreign war, based on “the treaties we’ve signed and
the body of international law to which we agree.”
1)
“When we’ve been attacked. Hasn’t happened, we haven’t been attacked by
Syria.”
2)
“When we are about to be attacked. When the enemy’s
at the gates, we don’t have to wait for them to fire the first bullet.
When an attack is imminent… Not the case with Syria.”
3)
“When we’ve been invited into the country of an ally that’s been
attacked…Doesn’t apply for Syria.”
4)
“When a country has violated an international norm to which it has agreed, and
the U.N. has authorized us to do it.”
Some
might say the use of chemical weapons has violated an “international norm,” but
Napolitano pointed out that Syria didn’t sign the treaty against the use of
chemical weapons.
He then went a
step further: “Who’s used chemical weapons on their own people? How far are we
from Waco, Texas, where federal agents
used chemical weapons to murder 76 Americans in 1993, in the Clinton
administration? Can you imagine if China or Russia wanted to bomb us to punish
us for what we did at the time?” We also use Agent Orange in Vietnam and
depleted uranium in Iraq.
Beck then asked
Napolitano whether any of what is happening constitutes treason, saying “common
sense” tells him fighting on the same side as Al-Qaeda certainly seems like
aiding and abetting the enemy.
“[Treason]
would be providing material assistance to an organization that is waging war,
or a state that is waging war against you,” Napolitano began. “The government
prosecutes people for providing material assistance to terrorist organizations
– that’s life in prison. How could the government itself provide material
assistance to a terrorist organization?”
When Beck
pointed out that the administration would argue they’re not providing
assistance to Al-Qaeda, they’re providing assistance to “the good guys,”
Napolitano noted that if Assad falls, Al-Qaeda will kill all those “good guys”
who stand in their way, take their weapons, and take control.
“If we do
anything to help Al-Qaeda by harming Bashar al-Assad, by weakening him, by
degrading him, by leveling the playing field of the battlefield, as John McCain
said, that will be the moral equivalent of providing aid and comfort to the
enemy, that is known as treason,” Napolitano said. “And if we bomb a
country, if we enter the country militarily absent those four conditions we
just talked about, the president could be charged for a war crime for which
there is no statute of limitations.”
Beck asked if
the judge would “press for treason” if President Obama decides to strike Syria,
and if he believes we should impeach him?
“Yes, I believe
we should impeach him for the NSA spying alone,” Napolitano responded without
hesitation. “It is the most massive, organized, systematic violation of
expressly articulated Constitutional freedoms in the history of the United
States, again, putting aside the Civil War era. Treason would be more
difficult. Why? A treason charge would have to be brought by a federal
prosecutor, which he controls.”
We are not only
less safe as a result of surveillance programs, Napolitano argued, we are also
less free.
He referenced a line from a former head of the KGB, “Show
me the man, and I’ll show you the crime.”
“There are 4,400 federal crimes…You can find a criminal
act to apply to almost anyone,” he said. “The reason that that doesn’t
happen is because we have areas of human behavior immune from government
surveillance…but when the government can watch everything we do, and listen to
everything we say it will, if it wants to… find something you did or said that
violates one of those 4,400 crimes and then ruin you with a prosecution, and really ruin
you with a conviction.”
“Freedom
requires breathing room,” he concluded, and Beck added that it also needs
morality.
In May, Turkish anti-terror police confiscated a two-kilogram
cylinder of sarin gas from members of the Jabhat al-Nusra Front based in
Southern Turkey near the Syrian border, according to a classified report
obtained by WND.
The National Ground Intelligence Center report states that
Al-Qaeda in Iraq produced the sarin gas and then shipped it to the al-Nusra
Front for use in Syria, a report in the InfoWars said.
Two months prior to the confiscation, 26 people and Syrian
government forces died from exposure to sarin gas delivered in a rocket attack
on Aleppo, a city in the northwestern region of Syria near the Turkish border.
“The rocket came from a place controlled by the terrorists and
which is located close to the Turkish territory,” according to a Syrian
government statement in response to the attack. “One can assume that the weapon
came from Turkey.”
The document also describes the sarin seized in Turkey as not
being military grade but rather a “kitchen variety,” which corresponds to the
sarin gas used in the Aug. 21 chemical attack near Damascus, according to Dr.
Yossef Bodansky, a top terrorism expert.
Bodansky said that unlike military grade sarin, the sarin used in
the Damascus attack did not accumulate around the victims’ hair and clothing.
If it did, said Bodansky, the sarin molecules would have detached
from the victims and “killed or injured the first responders who touched the
victims’ bodies without protective clothes … and masks.”
Yet there were no reported casualties among the first respondents
to the attack, none of whom were wearing adequate protective gear.
High-level US intelligence officials reinforce Bodansky’s
conclusion, stating that they are not convinced that the Aug. 21 chemical attack
was carried out per Assad’s orders or that it was even carried out by syrian
government.
They are not even sure that Assad even knew about the attack
beforehand.
Intercepted Syrian military communications reveal that after the
Aug. 21 attack, the Syrian general staff were in a complete panic thinking that
their 155th Brigade launched an unauthorized chemical attack in defiance of
prior orders not to do so.
This led to Syrian intelligence interrogating the major in charge
of the brigade for three days, who adamantly denied firing any missiles and
encouraged the general staff to count his weapons inventory.
All of the brigade’s missiles were accounted for.
Pierre Piccinin da Prata, a Belgium writer who was kidnapped by
the al-Nursa Front, said that during his captivity he overheard his rebel
captors admit that they carried out the Aug. 21 chemical attack as a false flag
in order to lure the United States into the conflict to help Al-Qaeda topple
Assad.
While the Obama administration continues to push our military into
entering Syria as “al-Qaeda’s air force,” fighting alongside extremists
recruited and armed by the CIA, the evidence strongly points to the al-Nusra
Front, designated by the US as a terrorist organization, as responsible for the
Aug. 21 chemical attack.
 |
| How our Milky Way Galaxy might look from outside |
New
research suggests that, as seen from the outside, the central bulge of our
Milky Way galaxy shows up as a peanut-shaped glowing ball of stars, while the
spiral arms and their associated dust clouds form a narrow band.
One of the most important and massive parts of the galaxy is the
galactic bulge. This huge central cloud of about 10,000 million stars spans
thousands of light-years, but its structure and origin are not well understood.
Why not, when it’s our home galaxy? Because, from our vantage point from within
the galactic disk, our view of this central region — at about 27,000
light-years’ distance — is heavily obscured by dense clouds of gas and dust.
Astronomers can only obtain a good view of the bulge by
observing longer wavelength light, such as infrared radiation, which can
penetrate the dust clouds. What an amazing universe our God created.
The Resume of Jesus Christ
Address:
Ephesians 1:20
Phone:
Romans 10:13
Website:
The Bible . Keywords: Christ, Lord, Savior and Jesus
_____________________________________________________
Objective
My name is
Jesus -The Christ. Many call me Lord! I've sent you my resume because I'm
seeking the top management position in your heart. Please consider my
accomplishments as set forth in my resume.
_____________________________________________________________________
Qualifications
I founded the earth and
established the heavens, (See Proverbs 3:19)
I formed man from the dust of the
ground, (See Genesis 2:7)
I breathed into man the breath of
life, (See Genesis 2:7)
I redeemed man from the curse of
the law, (See Galatians 3:13)
The blessings of the Abrahamic
Covenant comes upon your life through me, (See Galatians 3:14)
_____________________________________________________________________
Occupational Background
I've only had one employer, (See
Luke 2:49 ).
I've never been tardy, absent,
disobedient, slothful or disrespectful.
My employer has nothing but rave
reviews for me, (See Matthew 3:15 -17)
_____________________________________________________________________
Skills Work Experiences
Some of my skills and work
experiences include: empowering the poor to be poor no more, healing the
brokenhearted, setting the captives free, healing the sick, restoring
sight to the blind and setting at liberty them that are bruised, (See Luke
4:18).
I am a Wonderful Counselor, (See
Isaiah 9:6). People who listen to me shall dwell safely and shall not fear
evil, (See Proverbs 1:33 ).
Most importantly, I have the
authority, ability and power to cleanse you of your sins, (See I John
1:7-9)
_____________________________________________________________________
Educational Background
I encompass the entire breadth
and length of knowledge, wisdom and understanding, (See Proverbs 2:6).
In me are hid all of the
treasures of wisdom and knowledge, (See Colossians 2:3).
My Word is so powerful; it has
been described as being a lamp unto your feet and a light unto your path,
(See Psalms 119:105).
I can even tell you all of the
secrets of your heart, (See Psalms 44:21).
_____________________________________________________________________
Major Accomplishments
I was an active participant in
the greatest Summit Meeting of all times, (See Genesis 1:26 ).
I laid down my life so that you
may live, (See II Corinthians 5:15 ).
I defeated the arch enemy of God
and mankind and made a show of them openly, (See Colossians 2:15 ).
I've miraculously fed the poor,
healed the sick and raised the dead!
There are many more major
accomplishments, too many to mention here. You can read them on my
website, which is located at: www dot - the BIBLE. You don't need an
Internet connection or computer to access my website.
_____________________________________________________________________
References
Believers and followers worldwide
will testify to my divine healing, salvation, deliverance, miracles,
restoration and supernatural guidance.
_____________________________________________________________________
In Summation
Now that you've read my resume,
I'm confident that I'm the only candidate uniquely qualified to fill this
vital position in your heart. In summation, I will properly direct your paths,
(See Proverbs 3:5-6), and lead you into everlasting life, (See John 6:47
). When can I start?
Time is of the essence, (See Hebrews 3:15 ).
 |
| An Iranian soldier in Syria |
http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/apparently-iranians-fighting-in-syria-for-assad/
Friends, below is the letter President Putin of Russia wrote to the American people. I found it interesting that in the last sentence he mentioned God. I found that refreshing. I never thought I would never see the day when I agreed in substance with a Russian President.
MOSCOW — RECENT events surrounding Syria have prompted me to
speak directly to the American people and their political lea
ders. It is important to do so at a time of insufficient communication between our societies.
ders. It is important to do so at a time of insufficient communication between our societies.
Relations between us have
passed through different stages. We stood against each other during the cold
war. But we were also allies once, and defeated the Nazis together. The
universal international organization — the United Nations — was then established
to prevent such devastation from ever happening again.
The United Nations’
founders understood that decisions affecting war and peace should happen only
by consensus, and with America’s consent the veto by Security Council permanent
members was enshrined in the United Nations Charter. The profound wisdom of
this has underpinned the stability of international relations for decades.
No one wants the United
Nations to suffer the fate of the League of Nations, which collapsed because it
lacked real leverage. This is possible if influential countries bypass the
United Nations and take military action without Security Council authorization.
The potential strike by the United States against Syria,
despite strong opposition from many countries and major political and religious
leaders, including the pope, will result in more innocent victims and
escalation, potentially spreading the conflict far beyond Syria’s borders. A
strike would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism. It
could undermine multilateral efforts to resolve the Iranian nuclear problem and
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and further destabilize the Middle East and North Africa. It could
throw the entire system of international law and order out of balance.
Syria is not witnessing a
battle for democracy, but an armed conflict between government and opposition
in a multireligious country. There
are few champions of democracy in Syria.
But there are more than enough Qaeda fighters and extremists of all stripes
battling the government. The United States State Department has designated Al
Nusra Front and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, fighting with the
opposition, as terrorist organizations. This internal conflict, fueled by
foreign weapons supplied to the opposition, is one of the bloodiest in the
world.
Mercenaries from Arab countries fighting there, and
hundreds of militants from Western countries and even Russia, are an issue of
our deep concern. Might they not return to our countries with experience
acquired in Syria? (Yes, they will we have seen this repeatedly with al Qaeda and
other terrorists.) After all, after fighting in Libya, extremists moved on to
Mali. This threatens us all.
From the outset, Russia has
advocated peaceful dialogue enabling Syrians to develop a compromise plan for
their own future. We are
not protecting the Syrian government, but international law. We need to
use the United Nations Security Council and believe that preserving law and
order in today’s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep
international relations from sliding into chaos. The law is still the law, and we must follow it whether
we like it or not. Under current international law, force is permitted only in
self-defense or by the decision of the Security Council. Anything else
is unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an act of
aggression.
No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria. But
there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by
opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons,
who would be siding with the fundamentalists. Reports that militants are
preparing another attack — this time against Israel — cannot be ignored.
It is alarming that military intervention in internal
conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is
it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world
increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on
brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan “you’re either with
us or against us.”
But force has proved
ineffective and pointless. Afghanistan is reeling, and no one can say what will
happen after international forces withdraw. Libya is divided into tribes and
clans. In Iraq the civil war continues, with dozens killed each day. In the United States, many draw
an analogy between Iraq and Syria, and ask why their government would want to
repeat recent mistakes.
No matter how targeted the
strikes or how sophisticated the weapons, civilian casualties are inevitable,
including the elderly and children, whom the strikes are meant to protect.
The world reacts by asking: if you cannot count on
international law, then you must find other ways to ensure your security. Thus
a growing number of countries seek to acquire weapons of mass destruction. This
is logical: if you have the bomb, no one will touch you. We
are left with talk of the need to strengthen nonproliferation, when in reality
this is being eroded.
We must stop using the
language of force and return to the path of civilized diplomatic and political
settlement.
A new opportunity to avoid
military action has emerged in the past few days. The United States, Russia and
all members of the international community must take advantage of the Syrian
government’s willingness to place its chemical arsenal under international
control for subsequent destruction. Judging by the statements of President
Obama, the United States sees this as an alternative to military
action.
I welcome the president’s
interest in continuing the dialogue with Russia on Syria. We must work together
to keep this hope alive, as we agreed to at the Group of 8 meeting in Lough
Erne in Northern Ireland in June, and steer the discussion back toward
negotiations.
If we can avoid force
against Syria, this will improve the atmosphere in international affairs and
strengthen mutual trust. It will be our shared success and open the door to
cooperation on other critical issues.
My working and personal
relationship with President Obama is marked by growing trust. I appreciate
this. I carefully studied his address to the nation on Tuesday. And I would
rather disagree with a case he made on American exceptionalism, stating that
the United States’ policy is “what makes America different. It’s what makes us
exceptional.” It is
extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional,
whatever the motivation. There are big countries and small countries, rich and
poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way
to democracy. Their policies differ, too. We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s
blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.
Vladimir
V. Putin is the president of Russia.
Friends, NASA has announced that the first human-made object left the
confines of our solar system a year ago. It is now traveling beyond the heliosphere, or sphere of our sun’s influence. NASA made the
announcement on September 12, 2013 that the Voyager 1 spacecraft – launched
from Earth in 1977 – has now officially entered
interstellar space. NASA also released this video, in which the sounds of
interstellar space can be heard. In fact, the science team used these sounds to
help determine the density of space through which Voyager 1 is now passing. Personally, I believe that some day in the future we will unravel these sounds and static and find that it is God's beautiful music being played in His universe.
No comments:
Post a Comment