In 2011, the Pentagon released its first formal cyber strategy,
which called computer hacking from other nations an “act of war,” according to
the Wall Street Journal. In late June of this year, WSJ reported that Edward
Snowden, the NSA whistleblower, released information alleging the U.S.
government was hacking Chinese targets “that include the nation’s mobile-phone
companies and one of the country’s most prestigious universities.”
Now that EU offices have been hacked by the U.S. government as
well, one must wonder if that was an “act of war” on the part of the United
States.
Pentagon officials emphasized in 2011, however, that not every
cyberattack would be considered an act of war unless it threatened American
lives, commerce or infrastructure. There would also have to be indisputable
evidence that the suspected nation state was involved.
U.S. hacking of China and the EU may not have caused such harm to
those countries, but that hasn’t stopped EU officials from expressing outrage.
“I am deeply worried and shocked about the allegations of U.S. authorities
spying on EU offices,” Martin Schulz, president of the European Parliament
said. “If the allegations prove to be true, it would be an extremely serious
matter which will have a severe impact on EU-U.S. relations.”
Jean Asselborn, Luxembourg’s foreign minister, also chimed in,
calling the practice “abominable.”
A spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that “bugging
friends is unacceptable.”
French President Francois Hollande condemned the practice as well,
saying, “We cannot accept this type of behavior between partners and allies.”
Hollande later said that the hacking was not necessary for anti-terrorism
efforts. “We know that there are systems which have to control notably for the
threat against terrorism, but I do not think that this is in our embassies or
in the EU that this risks exist,” he said.
President Obama, however, doesn’t seem to think he’s done anything
wrong.
Apparently, you might be a terrorist if you work for the EU.
“The world will be shocked” by the next story on the National Security Agency’s vast spying operations, said Glenn Greenwald, the Guardian journalist leading the exposure—made possible by leaks from whistleblower Edward Snowden—of the agency’s far-reaching surveillance.
Glenn Greenwald speaking with
Eric Bolling on Fox & Friends about the ongoing revelations of NSA spying
and whistleblower Edward Snowden. Greenwald hinted that a new NSA story was
forthcoming and potentially explosive.
When asked if he was ready to unveil a new NSA scoop, Greenwald
responded:
I will say that there are vast programs of both domestic and
international spying that the world will be shocked to learn about that the NSA
is engaged in with no democratic accountability, and that’s what’s driving our
reporting.
Greenwald also gave a preview of this next exposé over
the weekend during a speech given to the Socialism 2013 conference, saying it
would report on “a brand new technology [that] enables the National Security
Agency to redirect into its own repositories one billion cell phones calls every
single day.”
The example the Obama administration is setting with Snowden,
Greenwald explained to Bolling, is to give a warning to future whistleblowers
that the repercussions will be swift and harsh.
I think what the Obama administration wants and has been trying
to establish for the last almost five years now with the unprecedented war on
whistleblowers that it is waging is to make it so that everybody is petrified
of coming forward with information about what our political officials are doing
in the dark that is deceitful, illegal or corrupt.
They don’t care about Edward Snowden at this point; he can no
longer do anything that he hasn’t already done. What they care about is making
an extremely negative example out of him to intimidate future whistleblowers
from coming forward because they’ll think that they’re going to end up like
him. That’s their objective.
On what he sees as “Snowden’s endgame,” Greenwald, who said he has
not seen the whistleblower since he left Hong Kong, replied:
Well, from the very first time that I spoke with him he said
that he completely understood that once he came forward against the U.S.
government and the Obama administration that he would become the most wanted
man on earth, and would be hunted down by the world’s most powerful state, and
that he felt that it was worthwhile to do that because he could not in good
conscience allow this massive spying program aimed at the American people to be
constructed in the dark. And he said obviously he wants to stay out of the clutches
of the U.S. government given the way they’ve persecuted whistle blowers. He’s
obviously trying to find a place where he can do that but his real goal is to
continue to be part of the conversation about why he did what he did, what it
is that he saw in the NSA, how these spying powers were being abused, and to
continue to make people around the world and his fellow citizens in the United
States aware of what their government is doing.
In the interview with Bolling, Greenwald explained:
This is what journalism is about—shining a light on what the
most powerful people in the country are doing to them in the dark.
The video below is about "big data and Jared Cohen is Google's regime change agent who technologically formented revolutions in the "Arab Spring". Twitter and FaceBook were agents used in the Arab Spring. Jared Cohen formerly was with the U.S. State Department.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITXq7lFejnE&list=PLSn1F05iE4gYM9Or5yc7gOLr9bQOyys9p
A pair of new reports in Bloomberg and Reuters indicate that many big tech
companies actually knowingly cooperate much more extensively with US
intelligence agencies than previously acknowledged.
Tech firms including Microsoft are said to voluntarily give advanced warning to the US government of vulnerabilities in software products
sold to governments overseas before they are patched, allowing US agencies to
effectively use them to conduct foreign surveillance. Microsoft’s corporate
vice president of corporate communications Frank X. Shaw confirmed
to Bloomberg that the company tips-off multiple government
agencies to vulnerabilities, but said this was designed for risk assessment and
management.
Another company that Bloomberg highlights is
McAfee, a subsidiary of Intel, which is said to be in regular cooperation with
the NSA as well as the FBI and CIA. The firm reportedly provides government
intelligence agencies with insights gained from its monitoring of global
internet traffic, which includes cyber espionage by “foreign powers.” But this
type of activity is in many way business as usual for Silicon Valley, as Reuters points out, diving deep into
the history of the US tech industry to note that many early tech giants got
their start working on military or intelligence projects. The Reuters report
notes that in order to maintain the integrity of tech companies with
international customers, the government typically works through a thriving
industry of third-party firms that offer services capable of compromising
“virtually every major software vendor.” Altogether, the new reports a reminder
that although the US government and tech companies often clash when it comes to
business regulations, on national security matters, they are often more in sync
than they let on.
No comments:
Post a Comment