"Never let a good crisis go to
waste". (John D. Rockefeller, CFR, Illuminati)
"In politics, nothing happens
by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." (President Franklin Roosevelt, 33rd
Degree Mason, Illuminati)
An employee of the National Security Administration (NSA) had gone
public with the news, and with the proof, that NSA, and other government
agencies, were recording every phone call, every fax, every email and every
stroke on the computer, of every citizen of the United States. Americans are
simply not used to such a total invasion of privacy by government spooks.
Such surveillance activity has been going on for a long time. For
example, in 1998 under Democrat President Bill Clinton and his
Attorney-General, Janet Reno. The only reason the government could not carry
out surveillance to the degree Snowden is reporting is because the technology
was not quite as good in 1998 as it is in 2013.
Republican President George W. Bush expanded this outreach to
include all forms of communication using all forms of sophisticated science. Government
intrusion into the correspondence of a free people is an act which every
Absolute Dictatorship in history had attempted to carry out. Dictators are
always afraid of being overthrown by political dissidents; therefore, every
dictator in history attempts to know what every possible person is saying,
planning and carrying out, against him.
Every dictator knows he needs a national security administration that
can spy on his citizens. A dictator must identify his enemies and arrest them
before they can form alliances with like-minded enemies of the state.
Adolf Hitler and the Nazis used the same reasoning for
establishing the Gestapo as our last three presidents have used to support our
Homeland Security, NSA and the CIA.
Hitler said, "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman
and child of this great nation, we must take steps to ensure our domestic
security and protect our homeland."
After 9/11 Bush repeated
Hitler's false threat.
Do you remember? Under the guise of protecting our freedoms,
Republicans and Democrats alike trampled them into the dust, through Patriot
Acts I and II, through dozens of lesser laws designed to implement these
dictatorial laws.
Again here is what Hitler said and I quote: "The streets of
our country are in turmoil. The universities are filled with students rebelling
and rioting. Communists are seeking to destroy our country. Russia is
threatening us with her might. And the republic is in danger. Yes! Danger from
within and without, we need law and order! Without law and order our nation
cannot survive."
The time will come when the citizens of this great Republic must
not only know of its existence, but approve wholeheartedly.
How does one accomplish this task? How does one persuade a people
who have never known the whip of the military slave master to accept a
surveillance program that so clearly threatens his historic freedom?
First, you adopt Hitler's maxim that people will support war, or
actions just short of war, if they feel threatened by an outside force.
Step 1. Some practice so offensive that it can scarcely be
discussed in public is advocated by a RESPECTED expert in a RESPECTED forum.
Step 2. At first, the public is shocked, then outraged.
Step 3. The VERY FACT that such a thing could be
publicly debated becomes the SUBJECT of the debate.
Step 4. In the process, sheer repetition of the shocking subject
under discussion gradually dulling its effect. This step is by far the most
important element in the six-step program.
Step 5. People then are no longer shocked by the subject.
Step 6. No longer outraged, people begin to argue for positions to
moderate the extreme; or, they accept the premise, challenging, instead, the
means to ACHIEVE it.
This insidious method of changing the deeply-held attitudes of
people is being successfully directed toward the American population as a
whole. Millions of people are experiencing attitudinal changes on a wide
variety of subjects today. This attitudinal change is essential to achieving
the New World Order. This attitude change must occur in this subject of
complete surveillance of American citizens. Officials of the anti-christ One
World Government desperately want the average citizen to support this
all-pervasive surveillance system.
Let’s look at how it is being implemented in the U.S.
Step 1 -- Mass Media revealed, in 1998, that President Clinton and
Attorney General Janet Reno planned surveillance of emails, phones and internet
activity.
Step 2 -- People were outraged, particularly the Conservative who
has been trained to distrust government.
Step 3 -- Passage of Patriot Act I in October, 2001, was heavily
covered by Conservative media outlets. The Bush Administration intended to
expand the Clinton/Reno surveillance, using the higher tech developed since
1998. However, what made the Bush effort so much more insidious was that Bush
interlinked efforts of various government agencies so they could share
information, thus making the threat to the average American citizen much more
threatening. The CIA, FBI, NSA and Homeland Security merged their efforts and their
databases.
Step 4 -- People are outraged, particularly the Conservative
citizens who realize the trap the Elite had laid for American patriots. Under
the guise of protecting our freedoms from "terrorists", our
government has created a total surveillance system of the people.
Snowden’s revelation about the depth and height and width of the
surveillance program shocked most Americans, to differing degrees. Undiscerning
citizens were the most impacted because they had been blissfully sailing
through life, unaware of the degree to which their freedoms to communicate
private had already been severely eroded. Discerning Americans were less
shocked but some of us ex-military and ex-government officials realized the
electronic capability of the NSA.
Suddenly, commentators and patriots split into two distinct
groups. Some believed Snowden was a criminal traitor. Some of us believe
Snowden is a hero for revealing the government surveillance that threatens our
basic freedoms.
Many patriotic Americans, feel that U.S. government secrets are sacred
and must be protected at all costs. Personally I do not believe that. I believe
our government hides its evil acts behind a cloak of secrecy. I believe the
greatest danger to our freedoms and liberties is our government itself. Most
citizens have no idea about the Illuminati and that it was founded in1776 by
Adam Weishaupt. The sheeple also do not know their Bible and are not aware of
spiritual warfare. Ephesians 6:12 We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers
of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in
high places.
Also since President Franklin Roosevelt, Americans have increasingly
accepted the idea that the government is entirely benevolent and can be trusted
from cradle to grave. Since many Americans believe the government is always
benign and to be trusted, and since they know they are not doing anything
illegal or subversive, they will conclude that there is nothing threatening for
the government to capture all forms of communication every single hour of every
single day. That is until one of their relatives is arrested or detained in a
government camp.
The vast majority of sheeple do not oppose this total government
surveillance. We have proceeded down the slippery slope just like we did in
1973 with Roe v.Wade, abortion.
The time has now come for the public to know of this surveillance
and to approve of the Illuminati plan. The Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan is
the vehicle by which the Illuminati is going to take this surveillance program
into the mainstream. The anti-christ’s New World Government is being
established before our eyes. The One World Government that Nimrod planned
thousands of years with satan can finally be established.
By Jon Rappoport
June 27, 2013
Is the NSA a leaking sieve?
Well, Ed Snowden proved it, didn’t he?
He strolled into work with a thumb drive, plugged in, and stole
the holy of holies.
This is the vaunted NSA we’re talking about. They can reach out
and spy on anybody in the world, but they just didn’t remember to put
safeguards in place, in their own offices.
They forgot. For years.
You know, just an oops.
And people nod and shrug when they hear about it.
The NSA says, “Now that we’re aware of the problem, we’re going to
install new procedures to tighten security.”
Sure.
And then there is this. The NSA can spy on anyone in the world,
but they can’t find Ed Snowden now.
So… to sum up: we’re supposed to believe NSA can’t protect their
own files, and they can’t find the most wanted man in the world.
People actually accept this nonsense.
So the question arises: if the NSA really does know where Snowden
is right now, why hasn’t the Pentagon dispatched a team to snatch him and bring
him home? Or why hasn’t the team killed him?
Two reasons. If Snowden really does have more damning information,
and if, as Glenn Greenwald says, Snowden’s already sent it to multiple people
in case anything happens to him, then capturing or killing him would trigger
the release of that information.
And two, the groundswell of support for Snowden is growing at a
rapid pace. Can you imagine what could happen if the government grabbed Snowden
and brought him home to go on trial for treason?
The uproar would explode. The NSA would find itself under far
greater attack. Politicians like Pelosi and Feinstein, who’ve come out against
Snowden, could easily be swept away on the tide.
The current image of Snowden is sincere, honest, frank, and self-sacrificing.
He doesn’t want to go after individual spies. He wants to change the system.
As we speak, government-contracted PR people and psyop specialists
are burning the midnight oil, doing a risk-benefit analysis, trying to figure
out how they could handle bringing Snowden home and placing him on trial. How
they could change his image.
Is it worth it? What happens if they let Snowden roam free for a
few more months? If they bring him home, can they spin media coverage to make
him look bad? Worse than bad? Will that backfire? Do they have enough media
ducks lined up?
Will Brian Williams, Scott Pelley, and Dianne Sawyer tune up just
right on this issue? Will they be able to hypnotize enough of the public into
believing Snowden is a traitor?
What about the “online community,” which is firmly on Snowden’s
side after the revelations about nine tech giants cooperating fully with the
NSA? How about 100,000 sites and bloggers going wild about the injustice of
snatching Snowden and putting him on trial?
If, as I’ve argued in previous
articles (see Spygate on this
blog), Snowden is actually still working for his old employer, the CIA, and
forwarding a turf war between the CIA and NSA, we’d have to say CIA has done a
good job in positioning Snowden. The CIA might be crazy, but they aren’t
(always) stupid.
Right out of the box, Snowden made a complete statement to the
press about his intentions and motives. He just wants to expose the illegal
spying on all US citizens so the public can decide what should be done, because
after all, this is still a democracy.
Snowden says he doesn’t want praise. He’s not a hero. He just
wants transparency. And the NSA is breaking the law over and over.
Snowden looks the part. Young, bright. A self-effacing yet
steadfast nerd. Perfect. Nothing nasty about him. He doesn’t have that Julian
Assange edge. He’s just a boy. Look at him. He obviously means well.
Honorable hero? CIA operative? Either way, the US government is in
a pickle. It’s not going to be a slam-dunk with this guy.
In a related issue, it’s astonishing (to anyone who is awake) that
the Congress hasn’t come down on NSA like a ton of bricks.
We should be hearing a grilling like this, directed at NSA head,
Keith Alexander:
“Let me get this straight, General Alexander. Snowden captured and
stole your most secret data. Anyone of his rank at NSA could have done the
same, because you have no security protection against it. And now, with the
most sophisticated spying system in the world, you can’t find Snowden. This
makes the NSA the most bumbling stumbling trillion-dollar organization in the
history of mankind. Can you give me a good reason why we shouldn’t move to
de-fund NSA completely and start over from scratch? This is outrageous.”
And that would just be the beginning of the assault.
Yet, that’s not what we’re getting. Instead, so far, we’re hearing
a few modest criticisms.
Why?
The most obvious answer is, Congress is afraid of the NSA. This
bunch of legislators, these crooks and con men and perverts and felonious scum
are scared that they’ve been under the NSA spying lens for a long time.
And what could come crawling out of NSA files is terrifying to
them.
So they hold still. They take a deep breath. They pray for safety.
They go on the attack against Snowden. They fall all over themselves calling
Snowden a vile traitor who must be brought to justice.
Which tells you something about who’s running things in
Washington.
It also tells you something about the level of resentment that’s
built up over the years against the NSA. Not just in the Congress. In certain
quarters of the CIA and the elite media, because NSA has been spying on
reporters and editors and taking huge chunks of federal budget $$ away from the
CIA.
Lots of important people have been hoping for a way to take down
NSA a peg or two.
So this is the kind of Congressional-NSA conversation that’s going
on right now, behind closed doors in Washington:
“Here’s the thing, General Alexander. We spoken about this before.
Your NSA has been invading our lives with your snooping for far too long. Now
we have a trump card. Ed Snowden. We’re playing it. I’m not admitting he’s our
creature, I’m just saying he’s doing the kind of work we ourselves should have
done years ago. So we want some give and take here.”
“What kind of give and take?”
“Get off our backs. We’ll go easy on you. We won’t turn all our
guns on you. We’ll call Snowden a traitor. We’ll focus all the public attention
on him. But give us our privacy back. Now.”
“Well, I suppose we might do that.”
“But we have to know you’re setting us free to do whatever the
hell we want to do, without fear of being seen doing it. We need guarantees.”
“How might that work?”
“We need people we appoint to have oversight on NSA. Real
oversight.”
The beginnings of an uneasy truce. A problematic truce, to be
sure.
Oh, people might say, this sort of dealing never takes place.
Really? And you’re living in what world? The rainbow happy-happy
goody-good sandbox planet just to the left of Oz?
The only question is, do the political enemies of NSA have enough
juice yet, from the Snowden affair, to engage in this kind of conversation and
come out with a win?
But that’s about tactics. The intention is clear. There are
political players who want to take the NSA down a notch. Some of them may be
honorable patriots; but some of them are definitely rank criminals in
politicians’ clothing, who want to feel free from the Big Watching Eye.
Ed Snowden is their man of the hour. They will use him and what he
symbolizes to make hay while the sun shines.
Why is all this important? And why does it matter who Snowden
really represents?
It’s important because, the way this political game works, the NSA
will escape the current scandal with its major spying programs intact, there
will be dirty deals and compromises, and the NSA will still hold tremendous
power.
No one in Washington imagines that NSA’s spying on private
American citizens will significantly decline.
If people really understood that, if they understood that no
savior is coming to unhook NSA’s computers, they might begin to view the
Snowden affair differently. They might be willing to consider the real games
that are being played.
They might admit that what we need is a nullification of
Washington power that goes far beyond anything that Ed Snowden can provide.
Our real problem is the limited mind, or perhaps we should call it
the literal mind.
The literal mind can’t conceive of the levels of deception and
bent deal-making below the surface of events presented on the evening news.
The literal mind can’t, for example entertain the possibility that
Snowden’s revealed some important (though hardly surprising) information, while
at the same time, he has less than the purest of motives.
The literal mind is a programmed mind.
You present it with the image of the most competent and brilliant
spying agency in the world, the NSA, and the “fact” that this agency can’t find
its own ex-employee, Ed Snowden, and there is no perceived problem. No
inconsistency.
The literal mind accepts all contradictions like hundred-dollar
bills.
You could, for example, spend a year educating that mind about the
US corporations that aided the Nazis in World War 2. You could spell out all
the details. IBM, ITT, Standard Oil, etc.
And then, you could ask, “Do you think there is any chance the War
was manipulated?”
And that mind would say, “Of course not. It was us versus them.”
You could say, “The science on manmade global warming is settled,”
and the literal mind would never think of replying, “Explain what you mean by
‘settled.’ Who settled it? Exactly how?”
You could say, “Every year in the US, pharmaceutical drugs kill a
minimum of 106,000 people. Nutritional supplements kill no one. But the FDA,
which permits those drugs to enter the marketplace, relentlessly attacks
supplements. It does nothing to stem the tide of deaths owing to the medical
drugs.”
The literal mind would reply, “Yes? And? So?”
Some preposterous doofus on the news says, “Ed Snowden is walking
around with three laptops that contain the deepest secrets of the NSA. Chinese
or Russian hackers could have already gained access to all that information.”
The literal mind would never wonder why, then, the NSA can’t
accomplish the same feat and discover what Snowden has pilfered.
The literal mind, under guidance from elite media anchors, will
connect the dots directly in front of it, but it will avoid, at all costs,
imagination. It will never posit alternative realities or explanations which
then make those dots take on different meaning, fuller and deeper and truer
meaning.
The literal mind is full of fear and protection. It wants to
protect itself and it is afraid that something novel might swim into view and
shatter it to pieces.
The literal mind is a clog in the bloodstream of life. It’s a
believer in the extreme fairy tale of ordinary reality.
The literal mind imports, wholesale, images of ordinary reality
and clings to them like a leech.
The literal mind, when it accidentally rubs up against creative
life, retreats into a corner and mutters and curses.
The literal mind lives a second-hand existence through the news,
which is the only food it can eat.
When the literal mind reaches the end of its tether, it seeks out
codified religious blather invented by a priest class for the purpose of
cutting people off from their own authentic spiritual energies and insights and
connections.
The literal mind is a coward. It only asks for other cowards with
which it can commune.
The day is too long, the night is too long, the fear is too great.
The literal mind must therefore play out the string of a shrunken number of
days and wither away, hoping it can deceive the void it feels at the center of
its own experience.
The literal mind crawls around on a bed in the Universal Hospital.
It dreams of extinction, while knowing it is already extinct.
Do not hold out a helping hand to the literal mind. It will try to
snap your finger off. That gesture is all it has left.
In the end, the literal mind turns out to be the most fictional
thing in the world.
On Thursday, CNN’s Erin Burnett continued the Illuminati’s
propaganda onslaught against the “leaker” Edward Snowden. After fatuously
mischaracterizing Snowden as a “hacker,” Burnett introduced former General
Wesley Clark and Peter Brookes of the Heritage Foundation,
