| The U.S. and Saudi Arabia have blood on their hands |
Friends, I only became aware of the information in Paul Watson's article on Friday evening. Below you will find links to the watchman’s telecast from Thursday August 29 where I provided evidence that President Obama and his administration is lying about the WMD attack that occurred near Damascus and that al Nusra/al Qaeda terrorists were responsible.)
Below is our watchman report program from yesterday in which we discussed the "false flag" chemical attack by al Qaeda/al Nusra terrorists in Syria.
Paul
Joseph Watson of Prison Planet.com wrote the article
below.
August 30, 2013
August 30, 2013
Syrian
rebels in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta have admitted to Associated Press (AP)
correspondent Dale Gavlak that they were responsible for last week’s chemical
weapons incident which western powers have blamed on Assad’s forces, revealing
that the casualties were the result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling
chemical weapons provided to them by Saudi Arabia. (Watchman comment: When I
was in Iraq it was not unusual for al Qaeda leaders to use their foot soldiers
as uninformed pawns. For example, they would remotely blow up trucks while
their foot soldiers were driving. This
way they were assured the bombing would take place when and where they wanted
it to.)
From numerous interviews with
doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, many believe that
rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince
Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the deadly gas attack.
Rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to
handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as though
the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda offshoot Jabhat
al-Nusra.
“We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of
the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions,” one
militant named ‘J’ told Gavlak.
His claims are echoed by another female fighter named ‘K’, who
told Gavlak, “They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We
didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical
weapons.”
Abu Abdel-Moneim, the father of an opposition rebel, also told
Gavlak, “My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were
that he had been asked to carry,” describing them as having a “tube-like
structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.” The father names the
Saudi militant who provided the weapons as Abu Ayesha.
According to Abdel-Moneim, the weapons exploded inside a tunnel,
killing 12 rebels.
“More than a dozen rebels interviewed reported that their salaries
came from the Saudi government,” writes Gavlak.
This story completely derails the
United States’ rush to attack Syria which has been founded on the “undeniable”
justification that Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack. Dale Gavlak’s
credibility is very impressive. She has been a Middle East correspondent for
the Associated Press for two decades and has also worked for
National Public Radio (NPR) and written articles forBBC News.
The website on which the
story originally appeared - Mint Press (which
is currently down as a result of huge traffic it is attracting to the article)
is a legitimate media organization based in Minnesota. The Minnesota Post did a profile on them last
year.
Saudi Arabia’s alleged role in providing rebels, whom they have
vehemently backed at every turn, with chemical weapons, is no surprise given
the revelations earlier this week that the Saudis threatened Russia with terror
attacks at next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi unless they abandoned support
for the Syrian President.
“I can give you a guarantee to
protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the
security of the games are controlled by us,” Prince Bandar allegedly told
Vladimir Putin, the Telegraph reports.
The Obama administration is set to
present its intelligence findings today in an effort prove that Assad’s forces
were behind last week’s attack, despite American officials admitting to the New York Times that
there is no “smoking gun” that directly links President Assad to the attack.
US intelligence officials also told the Associated Press that the
intelligence proving Assad’s culpability is “no slam dunk.”
As we reported earlier this week, intercepted
intelligence revealed that the Syrian Defense Ministry was making “panicked”
phone calls to Syria’s chemical weapons department demanding answers in the
hours after the attack, suggesting that it was not ordered by Assad’s forces.
UPDATE: Associated Press contacted us
to confirm that Dave Gavlak is an AP correspondent, but that her story was not
published under the banner of the Associated Press. We didn’t claim this was
the case, we merely pointed to Gavlak’s credentials to stress that she is a
credible source, being not only an AP correspondent, but also having written
for PBS, BBC and Salon.com.
| A spent chemical weapon? |
| Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov |
DEBKAfile Dec 23, 2012 “At the moment, [Syria’s] chemical weapons are under control,”
said senior Israeli defense official Amos Gilad Sunday, Dec. 23, echoing the
statement by Russian Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov Saturday that
“the Syrian government has “consolidated its chemical weapons in one or two
locations amid a rebel onslaught and they are under control for the time
being.”
DEBKAfile reported on Dec
22, 2012 that the chemical warfare threat looming over Syria’s civil war and
its neighbors has taken an epic turn with the announcement by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov Saturday, Dec. 22, that “the Syrian government has “consolidated its
chemical weapons in one or two locations amid a rebel onslaught and they
are under control for the time being.”
He added that Russia, “which has
military advisers training Syria’s military, has kept close watch over its
chemical arsenal.”
DEBKAfile’s military and intelligence
sources report: The Russian foreign minister’s statement was a message to
Washington that the transfer of Syria’s weapons of mass destruction to one or
two protected sites was under Russian control. This had removed the danger of
them falling into the hands of the al Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra ,which
had come ominously close Friday, Dec. 21, when the Islamists spearheaded a
Syrian rebel assault for the capture of the al-Safira military complex and
Bashar Assad’s chemical and biological stores.
Lavrov
did not go into detail about how this arsenal was removed and to which
locations. But his reference to “Russian military advisers training Syria’s
military” clearly indicated that Russian forces were directly involved in
removing the WMD out of the reach of the Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists.
His
assertion that they were “under control” indicated that Russia was also involved
in safeguarding them.
On March 19, 2013 Russia Today reported that Syrian rebels used rockets containing chemical substances in
the conflict, killing 16 people. Reports say most of the casualties killed in
the attack in the flashpoint city of Aleppo were civilians.
“Terrorists fired a rocket containing chemical substances in the
Khan al-Assal area of rural Aleppo and initial reports indicate that around 15
people were killed, most of them civilians,” SANA news agency said. This is the first time the Syrian
government has accused opposition forces of using chemical weapons in the
ongoing conflict.
Shortly after the incident Al-Arabiya wrote that regime forces had
struck Khan al-Assal with SCUD missiles and cases of suffocation had been
reported.
The Russian Embassy in Damascus told RT that it had received no
reports on the use of chemical weapons in Syria.
Fears that Syria’s chemical weapons could fall into militant hands
have been a source of constant concern for the international community over the
past few months. The US and the UN have repeatedly warned President Bashar
Assad’s government against deploying its own chemical arms stockpile.
Damascus maintains that it would never use such weapons against
its own people, but would consider their deployment if threatened by outside
forces.
Reports that Syrian rebels had seized control of a number of
chemical weapons depots in the Aleppo province emerged on Sunday.
“Opposition fighters gained control over weapons and ammunition
stores in the village of Khan Toman in southern Aleppo province on Saturday
after fierce fighting that went on for more than three days,” an anonymous military source told AFP. Reports of the
weapons seizure came after days of brutal clashes between opposition and
government forces.
The source said the rebels only managed to steal a few crates
containing ammunition, as a large part of the weapons stockpile had been
transferred out of the facility. Activists disputed this, maintaining that
rebels had taken control of “huge reserves.” A video posted online
showed fighters looking over crates of weapons and ammunition, and claimed the
attack was mounted by opposition group the Martyrs of Syria.
UK-based opposition group the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights
confirmed the attack, but did not mention chemical weapons among the arms that
were reportedly seized by the rebels.
Russia Today reported on Sunday, June 10, 2012 that the armed
Syrian opposition has got their hands on chemical weapons, which they acquired
from Libya, a media report claims. They allegedly plan to use it against
civilians and pin the atrocity on the Bashar al-Assad regime.
The
report by Dam Press claims the opposition group in possession of the weapons is
being trained in its use inside Turkey. No further detail on the alleged
conspiracy is given.
The
Libyan stockpile of chemical weapons was a matter of great concern during last
year’s civil war in the country. There were fears that they may end up in the
hands of the terrorists and used elsewhere in the world. However unlike Libya’s
portable surface-to-air arsenal, no reports of the weapons going missing was
made public.
Syria
has a greater number of chemical weapons than Libya. Military experts say the
agents in the Syrian stockpile are also more modern that what Gaddafi had
produced for his military. Syria also didn’t join the Chemical Weapons
Convention and is not obliged to declare what chemical weapons it possesses.
 |
| The 10 anti-christ Kingdoms of Daniel 7:7-8 must exist before the "Time of Jacob's Trouble" begins |
Israel on Wednesday implemented an initial, limited call-up of
reserve forces and deployed additional anti-missile batteries to the northern
border in anticipation of a Western military strike against neighboring Syria.
The additional Iron Dome anti-missile batteries along the northern border will
help to block more, but not all of the missile Syria could send Israel's way.
Israeli military leaders continue to advise that the chances of a serious
Syrian attack against Israel are very small. An Israeli official said, Assad
knows that pulling Israel into the war would only further decrease any hopes
that his regime would survive the conflict. At the same time, this is the
Middle East, and anything is possible.
Actually, no,
"anything" is not possible. World events are completely controlled by
God's prophecies. While increasing numbers of political pundits have been using
the World War III label, saying that a global war could erupt if the West
attacks Syria, the fact of the matter is that World War III will not begin
until the world is ready for Antichrist to step on to the world stage.
When Antichrist appears on the world scene, after a massive global
war, he will be fulfilling
Daniel 7:7-8. This prophecy declares that the world's nations will be
reorganized into 10 kingdoms. The Club of Rome issued a plan in 1972 that
reorganized the world into exactly 10 kingdoms, a plan which will fulfill this
prophecy precisely.
When you study Daniel 7:7-8, you will realize
that Antichrist cannot come to this world until the 10 Kingdoms are complete.
Until these 10 Kingdoms are formed, with their own government, judicial system,
and currency, Antichrist cannot appear. Hence,
until these 10 Kingdoms are created, the World War III which is designed to
produce him, cannot occur.
In fact, the economic collapse planned during
World War III cannot occur. In fact, one market analyst believes that the
American stock market will move sharply higher once the missiles have completed
their destruction in Syria.
NEWS BRIEF: "After Missiles Fly in Syria, Watch for Market Rebound", Yahoo Finance, August 28, 2013
"The fear premium hangs over nearly every
unexpected development in the Middle East. Since the whole region is
characterized by coups, terrorist attacks and forceful repression, seemingly
any crack in social order can spiderweb into bedlam ... Yet there also seems to
be a natural limit to how much instability this famously unstable region can
export to the rest of the world ... Western policymakers are about to test
their ability to contain hostilities in the Middle East to their country of
origin. Recent experience in nearby countries suggests they will succeed, with
a Syrian conflict causing lots of immediate worry in global markets but little
lasting damage."
"Once missiles actually fly, however, its
a good bet oil prices will spike further and stocks will swoon ... It would be
a much bigger problem if Iran escalated the conflict by trying to block oil
shipments through the Strait of Hormuz at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, which
is a transit point for about 20% of the worlds oil supply. But that would
provoke an immediate U.S. response and be game over for the Iranians, says
Trevor Houser of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Considering that Iran backed away from such action when the United States and
Europe imposed sanctions on its own oil sales in 2012, it seems extremely
unlikely Iran would undertake a suicide mission on behalf of a war-torn
ally."
"What seems more likely is a lot of hand-wringing
among investors once air strikes begin, followed by a few high-pucker days in
the markets and then a return to relative calm. I think well get maybe a $10
spike in oil prices the day the strikes commence, says Houser. But unless it
leads to retaliation that disrupts supply, it would be difficult to sustain
price increases for more than a few days. If thats how the scenario unfolds, an
attack on Syria could be the ultimate buy-the-dip (and short-the-spike)
opportunity."
"
In geopolitical terms, Syria will remain a snake pit. But harming the global
economy is probably one bit of collateral damage the U.S. and European generals
wont have to worry about."
Friends,
we have read the plans of the Illuminati to move the world into their coveted
New World Order and a third world war and at this point it is not happening. We
have also passed their plans through Bible prophecy and realize that the 10 Kingdoms
are not ready to be instituted.
| rebels firing a WMD in Syria |
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Friday morning that the Obama
administration laid the groundwork for unilateral military action in Syria, a
shift officials said reflected the U.K.'s abrupt decision not to participate
and concerns that President Assad was using the delayed Western response to
disperse his military assets. (watchman comment: Obama’s "evidence"
in my opinion, is weak and circumstantial.
The WSJ further reported that Russia and Iran are said to be
preparing an "asymmetric" response; Iran has threatened to attack oil
shipment facilities throughout the Middle East should she be attacked.
Friends, God’s plan
to destroy satan and his followers in the Illuminati, the New World Order and
the Club of Rome’s is proceeding as Isaiah 17 plays out before our eyes.
On Thursday, August 29, 2013, in what has been called a
"brutal and vicious act," a team of 20 social workers, police
officers, and special agents stormed a homeschooling family's residence near
Darmstadt, Germany, forcibly removing all four of the family's children (ages
7-14). The sole grounds for removal were that the parents, Dirk and Petra
Wunderlich, continued to homeschool their children in defiance of a German ban
on home education.
As the family quietly began their homeschool day, they were interrupted by a ring at the door. Dirk Wunderlich described the frightening turn of events.
"I looked through a window and saw many people, police, and special agents, all armed," he said. "They told me they wanted to come in to speak with me. I tried to ask questions, but within seconds, three police officers brought a battering ram and were about to break the door in, so I opened it.
"The police shoved me into a chair and wouldn't let me even make a phone call at first. It was chaotic as they told me they had an order to take the children. At my slightest movement the agents would grab me as if I were a terrorist. You would never expect anything like this to happen in our calm, peaceful village. It was like a scene out of a science fiction movie. Our neighbors and children have been traumatized by this invasion."
Wunderlich said that his 14-year-old daughter Machsejah had to be forcibly taken out of the home.
"When I went outside, our neighbor was crying as she watched," he said. "I turned around to see my daughter being escorted as if she were a criminal by two big policemen. They weren't being nice at all. When my wife tried to give my daughter a kiss and a hug goodbye, one of the special agents roughly elbowed her out of the way and said, 'It's too late for that.' What kind of government acts like this?"
After the children were taken away, the family was asked to attend a meeting with the senior social authority in charge at the scene. The Wunderlichs agreed to the meeting and were joined by their attorney, Andreas Vogt, who came as soon as he was notified, traveling hours by train to attend.
When the parents asked when they could seek a hearing to contest the seizure of their children, they were told they would have to wait until the regular judge returned from vacation. Vogt told Home School Legal Defense Association that the authorities had displayed little sympathy.
HSLDA obtained and translated the court documents that authorized this use of force to seize the children. The only legal grounds for removal were the family's continuation of homeschooling their children. The papers contain no other allegations of abuse or neglect. Moreover, Germany has not even alleged educational neglect for failing to provide an adequate education.
Judge Koenig, a Darmstadt family court judge, signed the order authorizing the immediate seizure of Dirk and Petra Wunderlich's children on August 28. Citing the parents' failure to cooperate "with the authorities to send the children to school," the judge also authorized the use of force "against the children" if necessary, reasoning that such force might be required because the children had "adopted the parents' opinions" regarding homeschooling and that "no cooperation could be expected" from either the parents or the children.
HSLDA Chairman Michael Farris said Germany has continued to show its disregard for the human right to homeschool. "Germany has grossly violated the rights of this family," he said. "This latest act of seizing these four beautiful, innocent children is an outrageous act of a rogue nation."
The right of parents to decide how children are educated is a human right of the highest order, said Farris.
"The United States Constitution is not alone in upholding the right of parents to decide how to educate their children," Farris said. "Germany is a party to numerous human rights treaties that recognize the right of parents to provide an education distinct from the public schools so that children may be educated according to the parents' religious convictions. Germany has simply not met its obligations under these treaties or as a liberal democracy. HSLDA and I will do whatever we can to help this family regain custody of their children and ensure that they are safe from this persecution. This case demonstrates conclusively why the Romeike asylum case is so important. Families in Germany need a safe place where they can educate their children in peace."
The Wunderlich family has faced their share of problems in trying to homeschool their children. In October 2012, state youth officials were granted formal legal custody of the Wunderlich children by a German court based solely on the fact that the family was homeschooling, but the ruling was forestalled by Vogt. Over the past four years, HSLDA has reported on the Wunderlich family as they have moved from country to country in the European Union looking for a place to call home where they could freely homeschool their children. Although they found refuge from homeschool persecution, Mr. Wunderlich was unable to find work, and last year the family had to return to Germany. At their return, the children's passports were seized to ensure they couldn't flee the country again.
Following the raid, Dirk Wunderlich told Mike Donnelly, HSLDA Director for International Affairs, that he and his wife were devastated.
"These are broken people," Donnelly said. "They said they felt like they were being ground into dust. They were shaken to their core and shocked by the event. But they also told me that they had followed their conscience and the dictates of their faith. Although they don't have much faith in the German state, they have a lot of faith in God. They are an inspiring and courageous family.
"I've been fighting for German homeschool freedom for years," he continued, "and I had hoped that things were changing in Germany since it has been some time since brutality of this magnitude has occurred. But I was wrong."
Petra Wunderlich said her heart was shattered. "We are empty," she said. "We need help. We are fighting but we need help."
HSLDA has today begun a nationwide campaign to urge American homeschoolers to call the German embassy and its consular offices in the United States to protest this blatant violation of Germany's human rights commitments.
Home School Legal Defense Association is a nonprofit advocacy organization established to defend and advance the constitutional right of parents to direct the education of their children and to protect family freedoms. Visit us online at www.HSLDA.org.
As the family quietly began their homeschool day, they were interrupted by a ring at the door. Dirk Wunderlich described the frightening turn of events.
"I looked through a window and saw many people, police, and special agents, all armed," he said. "They told me they wanted to come in to speak with me. I tried to ask questions, but within seconds, three police officers brought a battering ram and were about to break the door in, so I opened it.
"The police shoved me into a chair and wouldn't let me even make a phone call at first. It was chaotic as they told me they had an order to take the children. At my slightest movement the agents would grab me as if I were a terrorist. You would never expect anything like this to happen in our calm, peaceful village. It was like a scene out of a science fiction movie. Our neighbors and children have been traumatized by this invasion."
Wunderlich said that his 14-year-old daughter Machsejah had to be forcibly taken out of the home.
"When I went outside, our neighbor was crying as she watched," he said. "I turned around to see my daughter being escorted as if she were a criminal by two big policemen. They weren't being nice at all. When my wife tried to give my daughter a kiss and a hug goodbye, one of the special agents roughly elbowed her out of the way and said, 'It's too late for that.' What kind of government acts like this?"
After the children were taken away, the family was asked to attend a meeting with the senior social authority in charge at the scene. The Wunderlichs agreed to the meeting and were joined by their attorney, Andreas Vogt, who came as soon as he was notified, traveling hours by train to attend.
When the parents asked when they could seek a hearing to contest the seizure of their children, they were told they would have to wait until the regular judge returned from vacation. Vogt told Home School Legal Defense Association that the authorities had displayed little sympathy.
HSLDA obtained and translated the court documents that authorized this use of force to seize the children. The only legal grounds for removal were the family's continuation of homeschooling their children. The papers contain no other allegations of abuse or neglect. Moreover, Germany has not even alleged educational neglect for failing to provide an adequate education.
Judge Koenig, a Darmstadt family court judge, signed the order authorizing the immediate seizure of Dirk and Petra Wunderlich's children on August 28. Citing the parents' failure to cooperate "with the authorities to send the children to school," the judge also authorized the use of force "against the children" if necessary, reasoning that such force might be required because the children had "adopted the parents' opinions" regarding homeschooling and that "no cooperation could be expected" from either the parents or the children.
HSLDA Chairman Michael Farris said Germany has continued to show its disregard for the human right to homeschool. "Germany has grossly violated the rights of this family," he said. "This latest act of seizing these four beautiful, innocent children is an outrageous act of a rogue nation."
The right of parents to decide how children are educated is a human right of the highest order, said Farris.
"The United States Constitution is not alone in upholding the right of parents to decide how to educate their children," Farris said. "Germany is a party to numerous human rights treaties that recognize the right of parents to provide an education distinct from the public schools so that children may be educated according to the parents' religious convictions. Germany has simply not met its obligations under these treaties or as a liberal democracy. HSLDA and I will do whatever we can to help this family regain custody of their children and ensure that they are safe from this persecution. This case demonstrates conclusively why the Romeike asylum case is so important. Families in Germany need a safe place where they can educate their children in peace."
The Wunderlich family has faced their share of problems in trying to homeschool their children. In October 2012, state youth officials were granted formal legal custody of the Wunderlich children by a German court based solely on the fact that the family was homeschooling, but the ruling was forestalled by Vogt. Over the past four years, HSLDA has reported on the Wunderlich family as they have moved from country to country in the European Union looking for a place to call home where they could freely homeschool their children. Although they found refuge from homeschool persecution, Mr. Wunderlich was unable to find work, and last year the family had to return to Germany. At their return, the children's passports were seized to ensure they couldn't flee the country again.
Following the raid, Dirk Wunderlich told Mike Donnelly, HSLDA Director for International Affairs, that he and his wife were devastated.
"These are broken people," Donnelly said. "They said they felt like they were being ground into dust. They were shaken to their core and shocked by the event. But they also told me that they had followed their conscience and the dictates of their faith. Although they don't have much faith in the German state, they have a lot of faith in God. They are an inspiring and courageous family.
"I've been fighting for German homeschool freedom for years," he continued, "and I had hoped that things were changing in Germany since it has been some time since brutality of this magnitude has occurred. But I was wrong."
Petra Wunderlich said her heart was shattered. "We are empty," she said. "We need help. We are fighting but we need help."
HSLDA has today begun a nationwide campaign to urge American homeschoolers to call the German embassy and its consular offices in the United States to protest this blatant violation of Germany's human rights commitments.
Home School Legal Defense Association is a nonprofit advocacy organization established to defend and advance the constitutional right of parents to direct the education of their children and to protect family freedoms. Visit us online at www.HSLDA.org.
